LeveragedBuyout
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 16, 2014
- Messages
- 1,958
- Reaction score
- 60
- Country
- Location
Why did America want to fight in the Middle East? Their rationale was to stop terrorism coming back to hit the homeland.
I don't think anyone would make the argument that it was purely for humanitarian reasons, firstly because plenty of other countries have far worse suffering, and secondly because instability and bloodshed in the Middle East has only increased since then.
Though America has somewhat protected itself against further terrorist attacks. Terrorist attacks have increased a thousandfold in the Middle East, but very few against the American homeland since 9/11.
True, the US in Iraq was a tragedy for Iraqis, but most of the violence was by Arabs against Arabs (according to the Lancet studies and the Iraq Body Count Project). The US committed violence against Arabs, it is true. But it also spent hundreds of billions to try and rebuild Iraq. Self-interest and humanitarianism don't have to be mutually exclusive. That said, I haven't seen any studies that conclude the Iraq War was beneficial to the US except for the counter factual ( e.g. If Iraq hadn't served as a magnet for jihadis, they would have attacked the US)--which by definition cannot be proven.
American intervention doesn't always work, but one only need look at examples like Somalia and Bosnia to see that yes, we also act sometimes for primarily humanitarian reasons.