Take it easy, my friend. Most of us have a day job and don't have the expertise nor the time to do "in-depth-research" for specific issues, so we reply on mainstream media for information. If you think mainstream media as a platter, you are surely entitled to your personal opinion.
And we should rely on the mainstream media for its portrayal of China recently? Why would they cover something so specific as education reform in India anyway? If you want specific answers you need to do specific research rather than give large generic statements. Or you ought to pose it as a question rather than statement of fact. I will be happy to try answer and explore the details side by side.
Sure, Modi has been in office for "just two years", but didn't he have a master plan to address the most pressing issues facing the nation when he was running for the office?
Yes and its already in action. By two years I mean its insufficient to gauge the results given instant data feed systems (another thing introduced only by this govt) have only just started to be introduced for real time monitoring/verification....be it for attendance, teacher training/accounting or physical infra.
So the old statistical sampling methods (which will be continued of course) need time to gather more data and analyse it....be it by govt or NGO.
90%+ of the relevant data out there in Indian education comes from before Modi even took power...and the vast portion of the rest is from his first year at best.
NO, I don't understand how "throwing public money at the education" as a bad thing. For Chinese, it is government's responsibility to provide best possible public education system to all citizens, and the private schools are for those who can afford extra expense. That's why the budget for education in China has been steadily increased since the market reform started in 80's, and it is now accounted for 4% of Chinese GDP, 3 times as much as China's military budget. It is THE best investment a country can do for its own future, so why it should be on back-burner? It is a Much wiser investment than tens of billions dollars spent on expensive foreign weapons, which create no job and yield no return for the future of a country.
You don't throw public money at a bad bureaucracy right off the bat. Most of the money will be wasted/unspent. What you should do is improve the bureaucracy, have end verification in place....and then increase their funding as required.....while in the meantime allowing the private sector to play its role as well under a framework of common standards.
I mean it was a regular feature of Indian bureaucracy that whatever % of GDP was allocated for education (normally between 3 - 4% depending on the year)....large amounts of it would remain unspent because of the terrible way it was designed and never changed even a little bit. And your proposal is to turn even more of the tap on? Sorry I would fix the fact the sink is both cracked and clogged first.
The Modi govt is 100% correct in its approach here. The number of bureaucrats that have been fired and replaced purely on merit and end-delivery is something that is unprecedented in Indian govt history.
Pumping more money in any govt related thing only works if the system is able to handle what it currently has and demonstrate efficient scaleability. If it can't thats when the private sector comes in....and the govt may just be better off subsidising that directly instead. Thats what the 1st term of Modi will show us and then make a very important decision path-wise on the future of education in the country.
Nothing of this sort of thing was even being
considered by previous administrations (much less published thoroughly, piloted and implemented like is being done right now). And you just laugh it off as "window dressing".
As for the other countries in south Asian, I have nothing to say, because they do not have the ambitious as a superpower that India always wants to be.
So it excuses for talking about stuff you have little clue about? I appreciate criticism, but please make it factual when discussing the modi govt.
There are plenty of areas where this administration is underperforming....anything largely bureaucracy related (which is where the main problem in education, health, social welfare) are not one of them.....because Modi is a harsh taskmaster that demands results....rather than who you know or how much moolah you gave someone behind the scenes.