What's new

India's ASTRA BVRAAM Successfully Testfired From IAF Flanker

AA+Astra+Firing+1.jpg







AA+Astra+Fire+2.jpg





The Astra tested over the sea off Goa today was launched by a Sukhoi-30MKI fighter that slung the missile on an under-wing pylon. Already travelling at several hundred kilometres per hour (the speed of the aircraft at the time of launch) the missile’s smokeless propellant quickly accelerates it to about 4000 kmph in an operational launch, as it screams towards the target fighter. A data link with the Sukhoi-30MKI continuously updates the missile, steering it towards a target that might have detected the missile and is manoeuvring to get away. At 15 km from the target, the Astra’s on-board seeker picks up the target and homes in on it. Reaching near the target, a radio proximity fuze detonates the Astra warhead metres from the target, shooting it down.

The launch at Goa today tested only the separation of the missile from the Sukhoi-30 fighter. As testing continues, the missile will be launched against an actual target, and perform increasingly difficult manoeuvres that ensure the target cannot get away by twisting and turning at high speeds.

The near impossibility of escaping from an air-to-air missile that has a “lock” on a fighter was memorably depicted in the Hollywood film, “Behind the Enemy Lines.”

“The air-launch was captured by side and forward looking high-speed cameras and the separation (of missile from aircraft) was exactly as per the simulation,” said a DRDO press release, after the Sunday test.

Key components of the Astra missile --- such as the seeker head --- remain imported. A seeker is being developed, but will take a decade to be usable.

The air launcher, a rail on which the missile hangs and from which it is launched, is a Russian Vympel launcher that is being built in India. It will allow the Astra to be fired from all four of India’s current generation fighters --- the Su-30MKI, MiG-29, Mirage 2000 and the Tejas Light Combat Aircraft.

Astra components that the DRDO has successfully developed indigenously include the data link between aircraft and missile, its on-board computer, inertial navigation system, the radio proximity fuze, and the fibre-optic gyroscope.

The current version of the Astra will be followed by a longer-range Astra Mark II, which can be launched at enemy fighters 80 kilometres away. The Mark II, which will have a state-of-the-art ring-laser gyro, is expected to be flight tested later this year.

The Astra Project Director Dr S Venugopal, said multiple agencies, including private Indian companies, had contributed to the missile. He said, “The air launch of Astra was perfect in all respects… HAL (Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd) carried out the modification in Su-30 along with IAF specialists, and many Indian industries have an important and enabling role in the production of reliable avionics, propulsion system, materials, airframe and software.”

Broadsword: Astra missile debuts from a Sukhoi-30MKI fighter


One key component which article missed to quote is very high specific impulse derivative motor developed for Trishul Project. The similar one has gone into MRSAM and MRSAM.

Had India mastered this technology at the time of developing Akash, this motor would have been used in Akash Missile in place of RAMJET used in Missile. (My guise)
 
Key components of the Astra missile --- such as the seeker head --- remain imported. A seeker is being developed, but will take a decade to be usable.

Whats that mean??
 
missile’s smokeless propellant quickly accelerates it to about 4000 kmph in an operational launch,


I like this.A very high speed coupled with 40G turn will be very deadly.

Initially I thought that it is simply a release test from Sukhoi without integration. It is very nice to learn that it is been integrated with Su 30 Radar and test was carried out in fully functional mode.
Nice job DRDO.
 
then sad to say but drdo achieved nothing worth praising

Most Indian seekers are of Russian origin.

For e.g Indian Ballistic Missile better than American: DRDO scientist

Russia has helped India develop the new Radio Frequency Seeker for the interceptor missile, Israel provided help in developing the 'Swordfish' long-range tracking radar and the French have given the Fire Control System for the BMD.

The Astra most prob has AGAT. @sancho or @Dillinger could clarify or provide better inputs.

Edit : Prasun says its "The active seekers of the Astra Mk1/2 & R-77 are one & the same. Astra uses imported Agat JSC-built seekers.Agat JSC-built seeker was selected way before the DRDO began R & D work on the Ku-band ARSEEK for the PDV. This had to be done in order to freeze the Astra’s design a couple of years ago."
 
Last edited:
High off bore sight is a feature of present generation IIR or UV guided WVRAAMs like Iris T,Python V,AIM 9X,
AA 11 Archer.So no,Astra,like any other radar guided AAMs doesn't have high off bore sight capability.

Here is pic from Aero India 2013, which claims Astra to have off bore sight capability, so its official.

Astra+Astra+active+radar+homing+beyond-visual-range+air-to-air+missile+(BVRAAM)+developed+by+the+Defence+Research+drdo+india+lca+su30mki+(1).jpg

@GR!FF!N
I hope this resolves ur query.:)
 
Most Indian seekers are of Russian origin.

For e.g Indian Ballistic Missile better than American: DRDO scientist

Russia has helped India develop the new Radio Frequency Seeker for the interceptor missile, Israel provided help in developing the 'Swordfish' long-range tracking radar and the French have given the Fire Control System for the BMD.

The Astra most prob has AGAT. @sancho or @Dillinger could clarify or provide better inputs.

well the swordfish is a copy of greenpine radar so we did not take any israeli help here,,,,we just made swordfish under tot.

Next in line is Nirbhay with submeter accuracy. Once nirbhay is tested successfully, India will have almost all sort of homegrown missile in its arsenal.

whats the engine used in the nirbhay??

npo saturn one??
 
Most Indian seekers are of Russian origin.

For e.g Indian Ballistic Missile better than American: DRDO scientist

Russia has helped India develop the new Radio Frequency Seeker for the interceptor missile, Israel provided help in developing the 'Swordfish' long-range tracking radar and the French have given the Fire Control System for the BMD.

The Astra most prob has AGAT. @sancho or @Dillinger could clarify or provide better inputs.

Yes, Astra got Agat under complete TOT from Russia, though its kinda old news.
 
Looks stunning mated with the backbone of the fleet the formidable looking SU30MKI.

I have huge faith that soon India will be fielding not only Astra 1 or 2 BUT A ramjet version and will get SRAAM spin offs as well.

MY CONDFIDENCE is found on india impressive technology in missles as demonstrated by our space programme and ballistic missle programme including ICMB.

We defo have edge in the area

GREAT NEWS INDIA
 
well the swordfish is a copy of greenpine radar so we did not take any israeli help here,,,,we just made swordfish under tot.



whats the engine used in the nirbhay??

npo saturn one??
No the engine is indigenous. I had posted complete details along with the pic of a very detailed cut away model (surprisingly high quality) of the engine in question long back. Time permitting I will dig up the info. Till then the aforementioned should suffice to answer your question.

As for the Astra, the seeker is Russian, the babus finally showed some sense since they didn't hold up development on the missile itself due to a dearth of seeker tech. With the ab initio developmental cycle of a BVR missile over we can now venture to master more specific technologies with ease. Had the same approach been adopted for other programs then the shape of things prevailing would be very different. Write off the risk, don't hold up indigenous projects because we do not have an in country base for EVERY SINGLE specific sub-component, as these projects are concluded then it is easier to build upon them while bringing a larger number of sub-components into the fold of in-country design and fab. This way you still have relative cost savings, and smarter evolution of indigenous capabilities.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom