What's new

Indian terrorist army begging family of freedom fighter to surrender -his sisters awesome response

we both know indian hindu terrorist army hides its deaths.
after doing corruption of daal and saabzi anything can be expected of indian army. Of course it hides its deaths
Ok, I won't scratch that wound more. :lol:
 
.
Plz dont obfuscate,,,,this is the first time i am seeing a kashmiri bhayya insaan standing up to thr belief,,,maybe he is our enemy but atleast his family is clear abt it.typical do paise ke liye type ppl nahi hai atleast,,,i wish Indian army delivers him his wish,,,he wants to visit "7th heaven",,,ticket bana do.shudnt get any leeway coz he is bhayya admi

There is always a small minority that is vocally opposed to something. There's nothing new.

Separatists and militants that do not know any better are acting violently when there are more peaceful and much more effective means available. But all of this is going to end pretty soon.

Thats exactly what i heard too , She literally said She will kill him by her own hands , dunno what the Dimwit OP heard though ..?:o:

She basically supports her brother. So by saying stuff like that, she is removing pressure from the army on her family. She must have been instructed what to tell the army by her brother's handlers.

Lol even your fellow indian country man is slapping you dumb @ss's in the face trying to lie you pathetic little vermin

I don't think you understand sarcasm.

exactly his wish will be fulfilled of being a shaheed

We shall gladly grant him his wish.
 
.
Separatists and militants that do not know any better are acting violently when there are more peaceful and much more effective means available.

Occupying someones land with nearly a million troops is not peaceful either. This strategy has not worked anywhere on the planet. The desperation in your post give us joy on the other hand.
 
. .
Welp, we tried to settle this peacefully....
next on the questionnaire 3 feet or 6 feet deep?

Occupying someones land with nearly a million troops is not peaceful either. This strategy has not worked anywhere on the planet. The desperation in your post give us joy on the other hand.
And the fact that 3 wars with Pakistan all involved the Kashmir region doesn't factor into your calculations? It's our land, we have the right to deploy troops within our borders, especially to defend locations with an affinity for aggression by other countries.
 
. .
And the fact that 3 wars with Pakistan all involved the Kashmir region doesn't factor into your calculations? It's our land, we have the right to deploy troops within our borders, especially to defend locations with an affinity for aggression by other countries.

This is about Indian army vs Kashmiri population. Watch the video again. No mention of Pakistan. But then again, you can't be reasonably expected to address anything about Kashmir without shamelessly lying, to others or yourself.
 
.
This is about Indian army vs Kashmiri population. Watch the video again. No mention of Pakistan. But then again, you can't be reasonably expected to address anything about Kashmir without shamelessly lying, to others or yourself.
And I'm saying the "nearly a million troops" in Kashmir is directed towards defense against Pakistan. NOT KASHMIR.
Neither Pakistan nor the "million troops" are relevant to this conversation, but I wasn't the one that brought them up in this thread.
And I would really like to know how in our two sentences of conversation you came to the grand conclusion that I can't be reasonable or trusted. Or did you tag me with that description simply because my views contradict yours?
 
.

Thank you..... But your statement is half true.


1. Jinnah told - You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place of worship in this state of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed, that has nothing to do with the business of the state. … We are starting with this fundamental principle that we are all citizens, and equal citizens, of one state.
Now questions is you know how many Hindu were living in Pakistan and were they gone? Do you think that Jinnah wished as current Pakistan? My answer is big NO.


2. Bangaladesh: it didn't break from Hindustan. It was break from Pakistan and proved that two nations theory is a failed concept...



Two nation theory is a failed concept and how you get to that conclusion? Because creation of Bangladesh? What if India had annexed Bangladesh as you already have West Bengal and had proved the two nation theory a wrong concept, as the division of Bengal was the very first and symbolic achievement of two nation theory in sub-continent, then question arises why you hadn’t done that? Because Bangladesh was an outcome of administrative failure instead of theory failure.

If two nation theory is a failed concept then why Bengal is divided today? Then why majority of Muslims live in separate neighborhoods in India, not just Muslims but Sikhs, Christians and Dalits resides in separate neighborhoods, and the answer is to avoid communal violence in India, to evade the attacks of hindutva bhakts,

Your assumption and conclusions are based on your emotions. The fact is that two nation theory was a birth of multiple nation theory in India, and the concept is spreading fast.
 
.
now the question is how muslims are treated in india,
murder of muslims
babri mosque
Gujrat riots
cow lynching
love jihad
rape
rape of minors in temples to cause secretariat fear.
muslims slums
no job opportunities
muslims cant even rent a flat in mumbai without having to hide their religion.

the violence in India is terrifying, add to that the fake title of the worlds largest democracy. Indias democracy ends in illegally indian occupied kashmir which is the worlds largest open air prison thanks to India. India isnt secular nor democratic.

so dont question my Pakistan when you country is everything and worse then pakistan.

#ThankYouJinnah


lol look at these imbeciles.
literally these indians are buffoons cant comprehend simple urdu and they want Kashmir :omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:


Lol even your fellow indian country man is slapping you dumb @ss's in the face trying to lie you pathetic little vermin
@Mujraparty @randomradio


exactly his wish will be fulfilled of being a shaheed

but i wonder how many indian army pigs he will kill before his time is up. i herd you lot come back as dogs or rats after you die. just another reason to send the indian terrorist pig army to meet their creator :lol:

You are fooling me or yourself?

Do know status of Sikh and Hindu girls in Pakistan and forcedly they are being converted to Muslims else getting warning for rapes or murder. If you want then I will provide trusted world organisation report about minorities status in Pakistan. Ohhh wait, you might go denial mode and day... It's fake.
Fact that most indians dont understand here is that they cant compare the number of Hindus in Pakistan at the time of creation vs now (2018) , majority of the hindus were living in East Pakistan, after the division in 1971 , the ratio went down in west Pakistan ( Current Pakistan) . I wish they had enough brains to understand that. But than smartness and being indian is exactly the opposite.

Agreed, but Boss just compare Muslims status in India. How many percentage Muslims were living in India after partition and how many percentage are living now...
You will able to find difference in Pakistan and India..



Two nation theory is a failed concept and how you get to that conclusion? Because creation of Bangladesh? What if India had annexed Bangladesh as you already have West Bengal and had proved the two nation theory a wrong concept, as the division of Bengal was the very first and symbolic achievement of two nation theory in sub-continent, then question arises why you hadn’t done that? Because Bangladesh was an outcome of administrative failure instead of theory failure.

If two nation theory is a failed concept then why Bengal is divided today? Then why majority of Muslims live in separate neighborhoods in India, not just Muslims but Sikhs, Christians and Dalits resides in separate neighborhoods, and the answer is to avoid communal violence in India, to evade the attacks of hindutva bhakts,

Your assumption and conclusions are based on your emotions. The fact is that two nation theory was a birth of multiple nation theory in India, and the concept is spreading fast.

They didn't separated from Pakistan due to two nations theory. They choosene different path because of your leadership and they did some blunders and wanted forcefully administration on East Pakistan. Read the history carefully...
 
.

2. Bangaladesh: it didn't break from Hindustan. It was break from Pakistan and proved that two nations theory is a failed concept...

Two nation theory is a failed concept and how you get to that conclusion? Because creation of Bangladesh? What if India had annexed Bangladesh as you already have West Bengal and had proved the two nation theory a wrong concept, as the division of Bengal was the very first and symbolic achievement of two nation theory in sub-continent, then question arises why you hadn’t done that? Because Bangladesh was an outcome of administrative failure instead of theory failure.

They didn't separated from Pakistan due to two nations theory. They choosene different path because of your leadership and they did some blunders and wanted forcefully administration on East Pakistan. Read the history carefully...
What you were claiming back then? and what I have said in my previous post? can't you comprehend? Why sudden change in opinion? :lol:
 
.
What you were claiming back then? and what I have said in my previous post? can't you comprehend? Why sudden change in opinion? :lol:

I didn't change my opinion, two nations theory is failed concept and everyone is agreed except Pakistani friends.

I told bangaladesh choosene different path not because they were believing in two nations theory but they choosene because of your leadership. It's a long history and anyone can read about bangaladesh creation...
 
.
Welp, we tried to settle this peacefully....
next on the questionnaire 3 feet or 6 feet deep?


And the fact that 3 wars with Pakistan all involved the Kashmir region doesn't factor into your calculations? It's our land, we have the right to deploy troops within our borders, especially to defend locations with an affinity for aggression by other countries.

Cut that cr@p already. IOK is not India...fact.

Pakistan is just the boogie man for you guys, pull your troops out for 1 day and see how quick Kashmiris will either merge with Pakistan or declare independence.

As for 3 wars, 1st war Pakistan liberated 46% of Kashmir. 2nd war, Pakistan kick you out of Lahore, 3rd skirmish, Pakistan still holds the highest peak that oversee all your posts around as well as serves as excellent vantagepoint to monitor your occupier terrorists transporting their supplies to Siachen and other activities.

I didn't change my opinion, two nations theory is failed concept and everyone is agreed except Pakistani friends.

I told bangaladesh choosene different path not because they were believing in two nations theory but they choosene because of your leadership. It's a long history and anyone can read about bangaladesh creation...

Slaughter 1 cow and distribute beef among Muslims then come back and comment on 2 nation theory.

I'll be surprise if you come back before this century ends.
 
.
Cut that cr@p already. IOK is not India...fact.

Pakistan is just the boogie man for you guys, pull your troops out for 1 day and see how quick Kashmiris will either merge with Pakistan or declare independence.

As for 3 wars, 1st war Pakistan liberated 46% of Kashmir. 2nd war, Pakistan kick you out of Lahore, 3rd skirmish, Pakistan still holds the highest peak that oversee all your posts around as well as serves as excellent vantagepoint to monitor your occupier terrorists transporting their supplies to Siachen and other activities.



Slaughter 1 cow and distribute beef among Muslims then come back and comment on 2 nation theory.

I'll be surprise if you come back before this century ends.

If you failed to response on thruth then try to prove himself by try to insult someone. That's the reason Pakistan getting one vote or support ( sometimes 2&3 only) such as Fata, UN or any international form's... If people talk about kashimir or terrorism
 
.
If you failed to response on thruth then try to prove himself by try to insult someone. That's the reason Pakistan getting one vote or support ( sometimes 2&3 only) such as Fata, UN or any international form's... If people talk about kashimir or terrorism

Lol wut?
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom