Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don' t neccesarily agree with him on Kulbhushan being a spy for sure. But the logic he presents behind the abduction of the Pak officer, and a possible exchange - seems plausible.I Know For An India Najam Sethi Is Always Logical
Whatever, he is involved in killing of our citizens and we will hang him like US did to Aimal Kansi or you guys did to Afzal Guru. Thats final.And yes off-course I stand by what I said, of ending any common sense expectations from Pakistan as a nation. Given India's stated position as this person being abducted from Iran, corroborated by the Germans. The logical (which is application of common sense btw) would have been to allow consular access to the individual so the net steps for his trials could have been planned. Instead your government handed out a conviction without even informing India of a trial of it's citizen in the first place. Thus corroborating long standing gaping holes in your legal system. And now when the same is being pointed out with precedence of break down of your legal system, your ego gets hurt. I am not be blamed for that.
I havn't made a mockery of your judicial system. You (as a nation) have, (And might I add on multiple occasions)
Here is an reminder. And mind well he is referring to your high court.
"U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark called it a mock trial fought in a Kangaroo court. Having witnessed the trial, Clark later wrote:
The prosecution's case was based entirely on several witnesses who were detained until they confessed, who changed and expanded their confessions and testimony with each reiteration, who contradicted themselves and each other, who, except for Masood Mahmood... were relating what others said, whose testimony led to four different theories of what happened, absolutely uncorroborated by an eyewitness, direct evidence, or physical evidence".
look up Former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark take on the what high courts in Pakistan can do.
Whatever, he is involved in killing of our citizens and we will hang him like US did to Aimal Kansi or you guys did to Afzal Guru. Thats final.
Can you show me a precedence of death sentence through court Marshall in pakistan?Wow ... you are giving reference of the AG of a country that made Guantana ... Keep going!
And this was court martial! I don't think you are that stupid not to know the difference. So flaming, yes you are.
And yes off-course I stand by what I said, of ending any common sense expectations from Pakistan as a nation. Given India's stated position as this person being abducted from Iran, corroborated by the Germans. The logical (which is application of common sense btw) would have been to allow consular access to the individual so the net steps for his trials could have been planned. Instead your government handed out a conviction without even informing India of a trial of it's citizen in the first place. Thus corroborating long standing gaping holes in your legal system. And now when the same is being pointed out with precedence of break down of your legal system, your ego gets hurt. I am not be blamed for that.
I havn't made a mockery of your judicial system. You (as a nation) have, (And might I add on multiple occasions)
Here is an reminder. And mind well he is referring to your high court.
"U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark called it a mock trial fought in a Kangaroo court. Having witnessed the trial, Clark later wrote:
The prosecution's case was based entirely on several witnesses who were detained until they confessed, who changed and expanded their confessions and testimony with each reiteration, who contradicted themselves and each other, who, except for Masood Mahmood... were relating what others said, whose testimony led to four different theories of what happened, absolutely uncorroborated by an eyewitness, direct evidence, or physical evidence".
@The Eagle given you seem to be cognizant of the case, was that the rationale presented by your military courts too? just asking.
corroborated by the Germans.
I don't know where the stupidity lies, given that government of Pakistan, invited him to witness the court proceedings? Be careful before you infer stupidity on part of zia ul haq....Wow ... you are giving reference of the AG of a country that made Guantana ... Keep going!
And this was court martial! I don't think you are that stupid not to know the difference. So flaming, yes you are.
I don' t neccesarily agree with him on Kulbhushan being a spy for sure. But the logic he presents behind the abduction of the Pak officer, and a possible exchange - seems plausible.
@The Eagle Is the above the true reflection of jurisprudence in Pakistan?Germans are nobody ... you are a joke, seriously, if you this is your argument!
Next time we get a diplomat of some courty to say 'India is sponsoring terror in Pakistan', would you believe it too?
This Yadev is a terrorist, and a death sentence is just what he deserves. Him being an Indian citizen is irrelevant.
He was a spy involved in terrorist activities in Pakistan he was caught in Pakistan he confessed that he was involved in terrorist activities and now he will face the punishment for it too InshAllah he will be hanged till death war mongering, insults and chest thumping isn't gonna save him at all.And yes off-course I stand by what I said, of ending any common sense expectations from Pakistan as a nation. Given India's stated position as this person being abducted from Iran, corroborated by the Germans. The logical (which is application of common sense btw) would have been to allow consular access to the individual so the net steps for his trials could have been planned. Instead your government handed out a conviction without even informing India of a trial of it's citizen in the first place. Thus corroborating long standing gaping holes in your legal system. And now when the same is being pointed out with precedence of break down of your legal system, your ego gets hurt. I am not be blamed for that.
I havn't made a mockery of your judicial system. You (as a nation) have, (And might I add on multiple occasions)
Here is an reminder. And mind well he is referring to your high court.
"U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark called it a mock trial fought in a Kangaroo court. Having witnessed the trial, Clark later wrote:
The prosecution's case was based entirely on several witnesses who were detained until they confessed, who changed and expanded their confessions and testimony with each reiteration, who contradicted themselves and each other, who, except for Masood Mahmood... were relating what others said, whose testimony led to four different theories of what happened, absolutely uncorroborated by an eyewitness, direct evidence, or physical evidence".
Can you show me a precedence of death sentence through court Marshall in pakistan?
@The Eagle Is the above the true reflection of jurisprudence in Pakistan?