sms
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Messages
- 2,452
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
BS idea just for PR. What do they want to achieve with this when tracks on these routes are already electrified. Does anyone even think about scalability .
Ooh i get it , the executives just read that solar is good -.- .
Separate installation are expensive , inefficient , space requirement is high (constraint on train ), energy developed will be severely limited as trains are under shade for significant amount of times , no feedback to transmission lines and not to mention high wear and tear on top of moving trains .
Maybe they were thinking about emissions ( i doubt it ) . In a country where 60 pc power is from coal a solar farm is a much better alternative .
ALL in ALL stupid as it gets.
Please do not play advocate, judge and Juery. repot says they are in trial run. Let them collect data and decide based on facts that if it makes sense or not!
Regarding electrification... its slow and expansive if they can save a single drop of fossile fuel by doing so ...they must go ahead and implement it.
If it makes send we must consider implenting it on electric trains to... remember a unit of electricity saved is a unit of electricity produced.