What's new

Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

woow!! dont get me there !! :D
tnx anyhow :tup:

Glad to be of help. Please take what I have said in the proper context. I mention the ban w.r.t India where freedom is generally there to access all kind of information. So even small restrictions become news. From a chinese perspective those ban would be insignificant. Don't know the Iranian perspective.

I hope you get my point.
 
woow!! dont get me there !! :D

tnx anyhow :tup:

flag_india_small.jpg


What the hell is this? A polite, relaxed PDF member?

What next? Peace between Pakistan and India :D

this is shameful.

Politics usually is
 
so can anyone help others and tell the differences of raul ghandi and bjp party in 2-3 sentences ?

@Star Wars @Ayush @Srinivas

come on guys . it wont take more than 3 mins ! :no:

Rahul Gandhi has an IQ of a 5 year old... am not joking here .. HE has been brught up to his post only because of his family while on the other hand, most leaders in the BJP have rose because of merit ..
 
Dhananjay Mahapatra,TNN | Nov 24, 2013, 01.05 AM IST

NEW DELHI: Suspended IAS officer Pradeep Sharma on Saturday put Narendra Modi right at the centre of the raging controversy over Gujarat government's purported illegal surveillance on a woman by telling the Supreme Court that the young architect was subjected to hostile and intense scrutiny because the Gujarat CM was enamoured by her.

In his petition to the SC seeking a CBI probe into the alleged violation of the woman's right to privacy and the Indian Telegraph Act by Modi and his political aide Amit Shah, Sharma has alleged that he was suspended and framed in half a dozen cases between 2010 and 2012 because of Modi's suspicion that he knew about the contents of a Video Compact Disc (VCD) allegedly showing the woman in a compromising position.

This is the first time BJP's PM candidate has been directly accused of complicity in the "snoopgate". The original charge was directed at Shah, with two investigating websites alleging that Modi's confidant illegally directed police in 2009 to keep tabs on the woman because of the wishes of "saheb".

He has dismissed as an afterthought the Gujarat government's claim that the woman's father had approached the Modi government to ensure her safety by keeping an eye on her, and said that the tapes of Shah's purported conversation with police officer G L Singhal make it clear that she was victim of a hostile and intrusive scrutiny in violation of her right to privacy as well as the Indian Telegraph Act.

Claiming that he had introduced the architect from Bangalore, originally hailing from Bhuj in Gujarat, to Modi in 2004 when she was 27 years old.

"The applicant (Sharma) verily believes that Modi and the said female architect remained in touch with each other for next several years. There was also wide spread rumours regarding the Video Compact Disc (VCD) featuring the said female architect and a man in compromising position," his application filed through advocate Sunil Fernandes stated.

"Sharma has no concern with this VCD, But, he believes that Modi harboured a totally misconceived apprehension that Sharma is the recipient of the information regarding this VDC, the contents of which if disclosed in public would be detrimental to the carefully constructed and publicized image of Modi and consequently damage his electoral prospects," the suspended bureaucrat said.

"It is for this reason that a number of false and frivolous cases against the applicant herein were registerd with a view to implicate him and 'punish him'," he said.

Filing and bringing on the record of the Supreme Court transcripts of the entire footage telecast by websites 'Cobrapost' and 'Gulail', Sharma said the conversations between Shah, then minister of state for home in Gujarat, and G L Singhal, then SP in Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) in Ahmedabad, was during the period August-September 2009 when Singhal was reporting to Shah.

"The transcripts of the taped conversations reveal that the said lady architect and the applicant (Sharma) were placed under an all-pervasive and intrusive surveillance at the behest of a person referred to as 'Saheb" by Amit Shah," he said.

He alleged that the taped conversations revealed "severe and material violations" of the Indian telegraph Act, 1885, and an absolute disregard to the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in its December 18, 1996 judgment in the People's Union for Civil Liberties case.

Terming the explanation that the 'snooping' on the woman was being done at her father's behest as an 'after thought", Sharma said, "this explanation seems absolutely incredulous and unworthy of any belief in the light of the contents of conversations between Shah and Singhal, which reveal that the surveillance was extremely intrusive and hostile and not as innocuous and benign as sought to be made".

The purported 'no objection' from the woman's father did not absolve Modi, Shah and others of brazenly violating the law and the guidelines laid down by the apex court, he said and pleaded that the truth would be buried if the Gujarat Police investigated into the matter.

"It is important to note that the state intelligence bureau, the crime branch of Ahmedabad city police and the ATS were all involved in this illegal telephone interceptions and surveillance without having any role to play in the investigations relating to the case in hand," Sharma said.


Sex CD forced Narendra Modi govt to tail woman, SC told - The Times of India
 
He is playing spoilsport. Best thing would be for him to merge with BJP, but he doesn't want to do that. Instead he wants to support NDA by seat sharing. That is not good. His vote share is from the same pool as the one from BJP.

Hasn't congress been swept to power because of yeddy and his corrupt cabinet colleagues?

I am ignorant of Karnataka politics.

Enlighten me please
 
ujoOw0k.jpg


Election Commission to seek Rs. 2,000 crore for VVPAT system
fter getting the Supreme Court nod, the Election Commission will soon be seeking about Rs.2,000 crore from the government for introducing a voter authentication system called Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) before 2014 general elections.

The commission will need about 14 lakh VVPAT machines to introduce the system in all 543 Lok Sabha constituencies in 2014. However, the commission is apprehensive that so many machines can be produced and testing them in such a short duration of time.

Although the commission is looking at making optimal use of VVPAT machines in the 2014 general elections, it will tell the Supreme Court that covering all Parliamentary constituencies will not be possible before 2019 general elections.

According to sources, smaller Parliamentary constituencies across India would be selected for introduction of VVPAT so that voters around the country can "feel" the new system. The commission has already ordered 20,000 machines and more would be sought once the government approves funds for the same.

A price fixation committee has been constituted in the law ministry, the commission's administrative body, to determine the price of the VVPAT system. The initial price of a machine was about Rs. 13,000 but because of fall in value of rupee, the new price is estimated to be around Rs. 18,000 per machine.

One reason for the high cost is that key parts of the system are imported. Another is that only two public sector companies - Bharat Electronic Limited and Electronics Corporation of India Limited - can manufacture the VVPAT system that can be integrated with the electronic voting machines. A commission's technical expert group had certified machines manufactured by these companies.

The system, which allows the voter to see a paper receipt of the vote cast in the electronic voting machines, had been successfully tested in a by-poll in Nagaland. Chief election commissioner VS Sampath had announced that it would be introduced in 10 assembly constituencies in Mizoram and one each in Delhi, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan.

The new system allows a voter to challenge his or her vote on basis of the paper receipt for the first time. As per a new rule, the booth presiding officer will have to record the dissent of the voter, which would have to be taken into account at time of counting.

As introduction of VVPAT system results in increase in voting time, the number of polling stations have to be increased so that polling can be completed within the stipulated time. The commission estimate that the voter trail system will lead to 20% increase in polling stations.
 
Back
Top Bottom