Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

[Pakistani Fighter]

Who is hating whom?
Who are the kaafirs?

And what is the above picture representative off?

LOL Fake

 

[AfrazulMandal]

LOL Fake

It is not fake.

The temple was removed because some pujari of the temple violated a princess in Aurangzeb's procession.

@pothead Go ahead. Deny this.

 

[Soumitra]

It is not fake.

The temple was removed because some pujari of the temple violated a princess in Aurangzeb's procession.

@pothead Go ahead. Deny this.

Don't cry when we say "Ayodhya to jhanki hai, Kaashi, Mathura baaki hai"

 

[pothead]

It is not fake.

The temple was removed because some pujari of the temple violated a princess in Aurangzeb's procession.

@pothead Go ahead. Deny this.

Is there any use to deny this?
These are the same people who deny the atrocities of Mughals on Hindus...

And then they wonder why we don't trust them.

 

[xeuss]

It is not fake.

The temple was removed because some pujari of the temple violated a princess in Aurangzeb's procession.

@pothead Go ahead. Deny this.

More specifically, a Nepali Hindu princess. Aurangzeb had lodged her at the Vishwanath mandir when passing through the city. He thought a Hindu temple of the highest respect would be most suitable for a Hindu princess of royal blood.

Looks like rape culture existed even then, and is not side effect of modern India.

Don't cry when we say "Ayodhya to jhanki hai, Kaashi, Mathura baaki hai"

So you want to rebuild a temple to glorify the rapist of the Nepali princess?

 

[Soumitra]

More specifically, a Nepali Hindu princess. Aurangzeb had lodged her at the Vishwanath mandir when passing through the city. He thought a Hindu temple of the highest respect would be most suitable for a Hindu princess of royal blood.

Looks like rape culture existed even then, and is not side effect of modern India.



So you want to rebuild a temple to glorify the rapist of the Nepali princess?

You can say whatever tall tales you want, doesn't make it truth.

And yes we can destroy Aurangzeb masjid just like we destroyed his great great grandfathers masjid

 

[xeuss]

You can say whatever tall tales you want, doesn't make it truth.

And yes we can destroy Aurangzeb masjid just like we destroyed his great great grandfathers masjid

Oh yeah 5000 year civilization finds nothing wrong in rape.

 

[Joe Shearer]

@Joe Shearer What was the name of the princess and what was she doing with Aurangzeb?

Were there military alliances with them then?

She was a descendant of a Rajput clan allied to the Mughals.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

She was a descendant of a Rajput clan allied to the Mughals.

So Aurangzeb had no option but to demolish it.

Why is this story of being raped in the Kashi temple hidden from the public?

Releasing this info in the public domain will automatically protect the masjid from further encroachment.

Nobody will be willing to rebuild a temple on that site again.

 

[Joe Shearer]

OK...this can be correlated to the income poverty somewhat too I would imagine.

Now do we have time series for this?

Also we have to remember Muslim fertility rate across India only recently dropped below the 3 level (in 2011 census I believe). As compared to Hindus and other communities that have been below 3 (And some below even 2) for a decade or two decades or more previously.

This will help immensely because Muslim parents will have more resources to focus per kid for the breakout from poverty....but it will take some time, it wont happen overnight.

That's why a time series comparing the exact same thing (with same standards used) is so important. It will present the movements rather than simple current state snapshot.

A relevant cross-section: Hindu Indians are better off than Muslim Indians once we look at their distribution. A majority of Muslim Indians are concentrated in the relatively impoverished north; the proportion of Muslim Indians in the south is a minority. Their greater poverty, hence their higher reproduction rate, is a direct result.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

Oh yeah 5000 year civilization finds nothing wrong in rape.

'Way of liffe'

 

[Joe Shearer]

So Aurangzeb had no option but to demolish it.

Why is this story of being raped in the Kashi temple hidden from the public?

Releasing this info in the public domain will automatically protect the masjid from further encroachment.

Nobody will be willing to rebuild a temple on that site again.

Those who know it, know. What do you want us to do, fight the trolls? Even in this environment, they swarm all over you; what do you think they will do in real life?

 

[AfrazulMandal]

Those who know it, know. What do you want us to do, fight the trolls? Even in this environment, they swarm all over you; what do you think they will do in real life?

@pothead Gather all your fellow Sanghis.

Take a breath.

Then be sorry.

Read about your shameful past and learn and make amends. Aurangzeb had to destroy the temple because it was defiled.

@Joe Shearer Why build the masjid there though? We dont have such purification ritual!

@xeuss?

 

[Joe Shearer]

@pothead Gather all your fellow Sanghis.

Take a breath.

Then be sorry.

Read about your shameful past and learn and make amends. Aurangzeb had to destroy the temple because it was defiled.

@Joe Shearer Why build the masjid there though? We dont have such purification ritual!

@xeuss?

Building the mosque there was insensitive and high-handed, and was the character of the imperial power of those days. I think it was a terrible decision.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

Building the mosque there was insensitive and high-handed, and was the character of the imperial power of those days. I think it was a terrible decision.

Why do you think so?

I think this can be interesting.

Let the Hindus respond, I want to read more about this and nail their lies. May be open a thread on this. Lets see.