What's new

Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

I agree with the first part, not with the second. The second, pragmatic side to the BJP was our own wishful thinking; we needed a relief from the odious corruption of the Congress and its kleptocratic partners so desperately that we were willing to see the good side in anybody, just anybody. I don't think that a party with an intellectual range from Bhagwat to Bhagwati is going to make it. My own gloomy opinion, and I don't expect anybody else to agree.

As long as BJP does not appease a particular section, they will always have my vote.
And my second reason is relative lack of Nepotism in BJP. It means more often than not, it's people who deserve that get to hold power...
There is nothing worse than an incompetent person in power..
 
As long as BJP does not appease a particular section, they will always have my vote.
And my second reason is relative lack of Nepotism in BJP. It means more often than not, it's people who deserve that get to hold power...
There is nothing worse than an incompetent person in power..

No nepotism in the BJP? Dream on.

And perhaps a suggestion that there is no incompetent person in power? It is easier to name the three or four of the Cabinet who are effective; the rest are ineffective, complete misfits and amateurs visibly out of their depth, and terrified at the thought.
 
The said law wasn't brought in AAP's Government either, the below is an excerpt from one of the news source which proves my point...

"As per JJB rules, management committees are formed before the release of juvenile convicts to chart out plans for their rehabilitation and mainstreaming."

Source:

These management commitees are formed by who? Local state govt. Like I said buck ends with them regarding specific release conditions. Dont drag the centre into this. Centre was against his release in the first place.
 
No nepotism in the BJP? Dream on.

And perhaps a suggestion that there is no incompetent person in power? It is easier to name the three or four of the Cabinet who are effective; the rest are ineffective, complete misfits and amateurs visibly out of their depth, and terrified at the thought.
thats why i used the word 'relative'...

To AAPtards, please watch how Delhi people feel about the kranthikari naalayak

 
Last edited:
Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has filed a defamation suit against Arvind Kejriwal and other Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders for accusing him of corruption in Delhi's cricket body, which he headed for 13 years till 2013. Mr Jaitley has also sought Rs. 10 crore in damages, the Press Trust of India reported.

AAP will also file a First Information Report or police complaint against Mr Jaitley alleging forgery, corruption and loot of public money in the DDCA or Delhi and District Cricket Association.

The row involves alleged financial irregularities in DDCA and it surfaced after a CBI raid on Mr Kejriwal's top officer last week. AAP alleges that the CBI officers carried out the raid to search for DDCA files to help the finance minister.

At a press conference yesterday, BJP lawmaker and former cricketer Kirti Azad said that contracts were given to fake companies, crores were paid to them in cash and accounts were fudged.

The lawmaker, who went public with the allegations despite his party chief Amit Shah asking him not to, said he was a "fan" of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's campaign against corruption and was out to counter corruption.

The DDCA has admitted that there were irregularities, but has absolved Mr Jaitley of any involvement.

"After Arun Jaitley left, the president of DDCA sent Rs. 155 crore without any authorisation... We suspended him, he got an interlocutory order from the court, we had an inquiry also and we took away all his powers," said DDCA treasurer Ravindra Manchanda

The Delhi government has also ordered an inquiry headed by former Solicitor General of India Gopal Subramaniam.

AAP has insisted that Mr Jaitley must resign or be removed for a fair investigation.

Mr Jaitley said in a Facebook post last week that the Serious Fraud Investigation Office, under the UPA regime, had "investigated and could not find a shred of evidence" against him. "No personal allegation was ever made against me nor did I ever feel the need of contradicting it," he said.
The minister's party is solidly backing him and has dismissed Mr Kejriwal's claims as "malicious
".


Arun Jaitley Sues Arvind Kejriwal For Defamation, Seeks Rs 10 Cr in Damages
 
Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has filed a defamation suit against Arvind Kejriwal and other Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders for accusing him of corruption in Delhi's cricket body, which he headed for 13 years till 2013. Mr Jaitley has also sought Rs. 10 crore in damages, the Press Trust of India reported.

AAP will also file a First Information Report or police complaint against Mr Jaitley alleging forgery, corruption and loot of public money in the DDCA or Delhi and District Cricket Association.

The row involves alleged financial irregularities in DDCA and it surfaced after a CBI raid on Mr Kejriwal's top officer last week. AAP alleges that the CBI officers carried out the raid to search for DDCA files to help the finance minister.

At a press conference yesterday, BJP lawmaker and former cricketer Kirti Azad said that contracts were given to fake companies, crores were paid to them in cash and accounts were fudged.

The lawmaker, who went public with the allegations despite his party chief Amit Shah asking him not to, said he was a "fan" of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's campaign against corruption and was out to counter corruption.

The DDCA has admitted that there were irregularities, but has absolved Mr Jaitley of any involvement.

"After Arun Jaitley left, the president of DDCA sent Rs. 155 crore without any authorisation... We suspended him, he got an interlocutory order from the court, we had an inquiry also and we took away all his powers," said DDCA treasurer Ravindra Manchanda

The Delhi government has also ordered an inquiry headed by former Solicitor General of India Gopal Subramaniam.

AAP has insisted that Mr Jaitley must resign or be removed for a fair investigation.

Mr Jaitley said in a Facebook post last week that the Serious Fraud Investigation Office, under the UPA regime, had "investigated and could not find a shred of evidence" against him. "No personal allegation was ever made against me nor did I ever feel the need of contradicting it," he said.
The minister's party is solidly backing him and has dismissed Mr Kejriwal's claims as "malicious
".


Arun Jaitley Sues Arvind Kejriwal For Defamation, Seeks Rs 10 Cr in Damages

Its about friggin time. BJP should have done this kind of response long time back for all the haters.
 
W2bFzko.jpg


JNU :pop:
 
Back
Top Bottom