Indian Mujahideen a product of Gujarat Riots

[Shankranthi]

No, the terrorist was the woman who ordered the attack on her own people for political ends. Sikhs defended themselves as best they could and died fighting. Sikhs will never forget 84. For us it will always be known as a Ghallukara(genocide). The thousands of dead figure is according to independent researchers and eye witnesses who survived the attack. According to Jasbir Singh Sarna, Ram Nayaran Kumar and George Sieber the death toll of the Sikh pilgrims ran into the thousands. Ram Narayan Kumar writes

"The army which had suffered a heavy toll in the three days battle went berserk and killed every Sikh to be found inside the temple complex. They were hauled out of the rooms, brought to corridors in the circumferances of the temple and, with hands tied to their backs, they were shot dead in cold blood. Among the victims were many old men, women, and children."

As for Satwant Singh and Beant Singh, your statement just displays your lack of knowledge about the events and people involved. Those two bodyguards were NOT Khalistani sympathizers. They were regular Sikhs with no political offiliation who took revenge for the death and destruction caused by Indira Gandhi on the Sikhs. Attack on Darbar Sahib is opposed by nearly all Sikhs whether they are separatists or proud Indians simply because a Sikh will never support the attack on Darbar Sahib. You have to be a Sikh to understand what Darbar Sahib means for Sikhs.

That women was the PM of India and she did what she though was the best course of action against religious bigots and terrorists. I support her action fully.

LOL ....your attempt to showcase hearsay as evidence is pathetic. Sorry ....nobody here is buying snake oil.

Those pair of immoral and cowardly assassins who opened fire on an unarmed lady are indeed terrorists and maybe they represent the true face of sikhs. History will judge that. Do not expect any sympathy from me.

If the sikhs weren't such cowards and had shown some courage to kicked out the terrorists from Darbar Sahib there was no need for the IA to be sent in. Sadly the sikhs behaved true to their boasting nature and instead of showing courage, they hid those terrorists and kept quite in fear. That will always be to their eternal shame.

I dont care a fcuk about cowards who do not even have the courage to defend their own temple. It is the brave IA lead by Indira Gandhi who freed Darbar Sahib from the terrorists. We can all see how much Darbar sahib meant for the sikhs when murders, rapists and mass murderers were hidden there along with Bombs and guns

 

[Jaggu]

That women was the PM of India and she did what she though was the best course of action against religious bigots and terrorists. I support her action fully.

LOL ....your attempt to showcase hearsay as evidence is pathetic. Sorry ....nobody here is buying snake oil.

Those pair of immoral and cowardly assassins who opened fire on an unarmed lady are indeed terrorists and maybe they represent the true face of sikhs. History will judge that. Do not expect any sympathy from me.

If the sikhs weren't such cowards and had shown some courage to kicked out the terrorists from Darbar Sahib there was no need for the IA to be sent in. Sadly the sikhs behaved true to their boasting nature and instead of showing courage, they hid those terrorists and kept quite in fear. That will always be to their eternal shame.

I dont care a fcuk about cowards who do not even have the courage to defend their own temple. It is the brave IA lead by Indira Gandhi who freed Darbar Sahib from the terrorists. We can all see how much Darbar sahib meant for the sikhs when murders, rapists and mass murderers were hidden there along with Bombs and guns

1. the terrorist lady, Indira Gandhi may have been the PM of India, but she acted no less as a terrorist as Hitler or Stalin who killed their own people for the sake of politics. You can support her actions of slaughtering the Sikhs all you like, shows what type of character you are.

2. The men who killed her did so knowing she killed thousands of Sikh pilgrims which included elderly people, women and even many children. You think such a woman deserves sympathy? NO WAY. That witch got exactly what she deserved with interest! And all Sikhs are proud of Satwant Singh and Beant Singh for doing what they did!

3. Sikhs were not cowards. Sikhs fought against Indira Gandhi for 3 days against over whelming odds. But I would not expect a coward like you who can only act as an internet warrior to understand what bravery is.

 

[itachiii]

Yes, but Hindu RSS extremists and Modi doing the same thing is completely fine.

it was the islamic extremism that is forcing people frm other religions to extremist side.... and still u blame the entire world for u r wrong doings???

 

[Aka123]

That women was the PM of India and she did what she though was the best course of action against religious bigots and terrorists. I support her action fully.

LOL ....your attempt to showcase hearsay as evidence is pathetic. Sorry ....nobody here is buying snake oil.

Those pair of immoral and cowardly assassins who opened fire on an unarmed lady are indeed terrorists and maybe they represent the true face of sikhs. History will judge that. Do not expect any sympathy from me.

If the sikhs weren't such cowards and had shown some courage to kicked out the terrorists from Darbar Sahib there was no need for the IA to be sent in. Sadly the sikhs behaved true to their boasting nature and instead of showing courage, they hid those terrorists and kept quite in fear. That will always be to their eternal shame.

I dont care a fcuk about cowards who do not even have the courage to defend their own temple. It is the brave IA lead by Indira Gandhi who freed Darbar Sahib from the terrorists. We can all see how much Darbar sahib meant for the sikhs when murders, rapists and mass murderers were hidden there along with Bombs and guns

Don't generalize many Sikhs fought in the Indian Army as well!!

 

[Shankranthi]

1. the terrorist lady, Indira Gandhi may have been the PM of India, but she acted no less as a terrorist as Hitler or Stalin who killed their own people for the sake of politics. You can support her actions of slaughtering the Sikhs all you like, shows what type of character you are.

2. The men who killed her did so knowing she killed thousands of Sikh pilgrims which included elderly people, women and even many children. You thing such a woman deserves sympathy? NO WAY. That witch got exactly what she deserved with interest! And all Sikhs are proud of Satwant Singh and Beant Singh for doing what they did!

3. Sikhs were not cowards. Sikhs fought against Indira Gandhi for 3 days against over whelming odds. But I would not expect a coward like you who can only act as an internet warrior to understand what bravery is.

1. Indira Gandh was PM and had the mandate to do what is in Indians best interest. Only a fool would call a PM as terrorist ..............there is a long history of cowards claiming terrorists to be heroes.......looks like you just proved your worth.

2. Those sikhs who are proud of immoral cowards, who fire on unarmed women they have proved themselves to be cowards and Fools too. ....of course there has always been a debate about that (also jokes), but thank you for confirming it.

3. All sikhs who support terrorists are cowards.........All the world know of their cowardly acts and laugh at them. People who were afraid of terrorists and allowed them to desecrate their own temple is talking about bravery ........no wonder they are the laughing stock of India.

 

[Jaggu]

1. Indira Gandh was PM and had the mandate to do what is in Indians best interest. Only a fool would call a PM as terrorist ..............there is a long history of cowards claiming terrorists to be heroes.......looks like you just proved your worth.

2. Those sikhs who are proud of immoral cowards, who fire on unarmed women they have proved themselves to be cowards and Fools too. ....of course there has always been a debate about that (also jokes), but thank you for confirming it.

3. All sikhs who support terrorists are cowards.........All the world know of their cowardly acts and laugh at them. People who were afraid of terrorists and allowed them to desecrate their own temple is talking about bravery ........no wonder they are the laughing stock of India.

1. when the PM of India will act corrupted, she will be called corrupt, similarly If PM will terrorize her own country's population then obviously she is a terrorist. But terrorists will always have fans, looks like you are a fan of the terrorist Mrs Indira Gandhi who has the blood of thousands of elderly, women and children on her hands.

2. What are you talking about? your allegations are full of ignorance and lies. But in the end Satya me vijayte. Liars like you stand exposed that you condone the slaughter and genocide of a people and support terrorist heads of states.

3. Sikhs were not the ones who desecrated anything. No Sikh had any objection with Sant being in the temple. Indira Gandhi has only done a good job in using her propaganda in spreading lies against the Sant. Swami Subramanian who had spent days with Sant Bhindranwale and was his good friend tells the truth as it is and exposes your hero Indira Gandhi for what she was here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiQlfQw111o

 

[Shankranthi]

1. when the PM of India will act corrupted, she will be called corrupt, similarly If PM will terrorize her own country's population then obviously she is a terrorist. But terrorists will always have fans, looks like you are a fan of the terrorist Mrs Indira Gandhi who has the blood of thousands of elderly, women and children on her hands.

2. What are you talking about? your allegations are full of ignorance and lies. But in the end Satya me vijayte. Liars like you stand exposed that you condone the slaughter and genocide of a people and support terrorist heads of states.

3. Sikhs were not the ones who desecrated anything. No Sikh had any objection with Sant being in the temple. Indira Gandhi has only done a good job in using her propaganda in spreading lies against the Sant. Swami Subramanian who had spent days with Sant Bhindranwale and was his good friend tells the truth as it is and exposes your hero Indira Gandhi for what she was here:

PM and Presidents all over the world have to take decisions that will result in death of Millions. That is their job. They take such decisions day in and day out. As i said, only ignorant fools will call them terrorists. Thank you for proving that you are a fool.

Community of Cowards who are afraid of terrorists and let them hide in their own temple, will be called cowards by the whole world and the whole world will laugh at them.

Bhindranwale was a Sikh Supremacist and a Bigot of the worst kind. Only sikh cowards and fools will call him 'sant'
He was a blood thirsty man who openly celebrated when Nirankari Baba was shot dead.............and fools call him 'sant'
Bhindranwale was a thug and a goon who carried weapons and killed and threatened the cowardly sikhs who were afraid of him. He was shot down like the dog he was. I spit on him and on his dead body and his grave, if he has one.

Thank you for showing us what kind of cowards and fools his supporters are.

 

[Jaggu]

PM and Presidents all over the world have to take decisions that will result in death of Millions. That is their job. They take such decisions day in and day out. As i said, only ignorant fools will call them terrorists. Thank you for proving that you are a fool.

Community of Cowards how are afraid of terrorists and let them hide in their own temple will be called cowards by the whole world and the whole world will laugh at them.

Bhindranwale was a Sikh Supremacist and a Bigot of the worst kind. Only sikh cowards and fools will call him 'sant'
He was a blood thirsty man who openly celebrated when Nirankari Baba was shot dead.............and fools call him 'sant'
Bhindranwale was a thug and a goon who carried weapons and killed and threatened the cowardly sikhs who were afraid of him. He was shot down like the dog he was. I spit on him and on his dead body and his grave, if he has one.

Thank you for showing us what kind of cowards and fools his supporters are.

1. Heads of states are elected for the benefit of the country and it's citizens. But when a head of state whose only qualification is that she happens to be the daughter of the first PM of the country shows how qualified she was. She then went on to kill the best PM of the country Lal Bahadur Shastri in Tashkant through her KGB allies. She threw democracy in the dust bin when she called emergency. Then for political votes, she carried out the Sikh genocide of 84. Such a PM is not worthy of any respect. She deserved the death she got.

2. No, Bhindranwale was no coward. He was where he belonged. Who was Indira Gandhi to tell a Sikh of the Guru to leave a Gurdwara? The Sant following Sikh traditions of Baba Gurbaksh Singh Leel, died fighting against overwhelming odds. Today Sikhs in Punjab buy t-shirts and put stickers with the images of the Sant openly. But no one in Punjab will wear a t shirt of Indira Gandhi even if it was given for free!

3. Sant was not a supremacist nor a bigot. This is all Indira Gandhi's propaganda speaking. He stood for Punjab's rights. And that Dusht Nirankari Baba you have mentioned was the worst animal alive. He's the one who started the whole mess in Punjab in the first place. He massacred peaceful Sikh protesters in 1978. It was because of this massacre that Sikhs began taking up arms because Indira Gandhi used her power to protect and support him. He was Indira Gandhi's biggest supporter in Punjab. He used his followers to torture and kill Sikhs.

 

[Shankranthi]

1. Heads of states are elected for the benefit of the country and it's citizens. But when a head of state whose only qualification is that she happens to be the daughter of the first PM of the country shows how qualified she was. She then went on to kill the best PM of the country Lal Bahadur Shastri in Tashkant through her KGB allies. She threw democracy in the dust bin when she called emergency. Then for political votes, she carried out the Sikh genocide of 84. Such a PM is not worthy of any respect. She deserved the death she got.

2. No, Bhindranwale was no coward. He was where he belonged. Who was Indira Gandhi to tell a Sikh of the Guru to leave a Gurdwara? The Sant following Sikh traditions of Baba Gurbaksh Singh Leel, died fighting against overwhelming odds. Today Sikhs in Punjab buy t-shirts and put stickers with the images of the Sant openly. But no one in Punjab will wear a t shirt of Indira Gandhi even if it was given for free!

3. Sant was not a supremacist nor a bigot. This is all Indira Gandhi's propaganda speaking. He stood for Punjab's rights. And that Dusht Nirankari Baba you have mentioned was the worst animal alive. He's the one who started the whole mess in Punjab in the first place. He massacred peaceful Sikh protesters in 1978. It was because of this massacre that Sikhs began taking up arms because Indira Gandhi used her power to protect and support him. He was Indira Gandhi's biggest supporter in Punjab. He used his followers to torture and kill Sikhs.

You are keen to discuss the character of Indira Gandhi and to show she was bad as if that will somehow make the terrorist dog Bhindranwale look good. Maybe foolish people of punjab will buy this nonsense, but no one sensible is going to buy it.

I don't care for Indira Gandhi, but she was an elected PM of India and immoral cowards who shot her when she was unarmed deserved to be lampooned for their true cowardly nature and all their supporters need to be called terrorists supporters and sikh supremacists.

Bhindranwale was a coward who hid inside a sikh temple even though he had guns and goons ...... only the cowardly and Foolish sikhs would call him a hero. ...........compare that with Mahatma Gandhi and Lala Lajpath Rai who faced guns without any weapons.

Bhindiwala dog was shot down like one when he was trying to hide inside a temple of god. What a shameful deed for a 'sant' ..........the world will continue to laugh at him and at the foolish people who honor him and buy his memorabilia.

Cowardly sikhs never had guts or courage to take up arms against the british. In fact they were loyal dogs of the british. When the british left, the cowards though they could take up arms against Indians.......guess what......they got their arse kicked.

 

[Jaggu]

You are keen to discuss the character of Indira Gandhi and to show she was bad as if that will somehow make the terrorist dog Bhindranwale look good. Maybe foolish people of punjab will buy this nonsense, but no one sensible is going to buy it.

I don't care for Indira Gandhi, but she was an elected PM of India and immoral cowards who shot her when she was unarmed deserved to be lampooned for their true cowardly nature and all their supporters need to be called terrorists supporters and sikh supremacists.

Bhindranwale was a coward who hid inside a sikh temple even though he had guns and goons ...... only the cowardly and Foolish sikhs would call him a hero. ...........compare that with Mahatma Gandhi and Lala Lajpath Rai who faced guns without any weapons.

Bhindiwala dog was shot down like one when he was trying to hide inside a temple of god. What a shameful deed for a 'sant' ..........the world will continue to laugh at him and at the foolish people who honor him and buy his memorabilia.

Cowardly sikhs never had guts or courage to take up arms against the british. In fact they were loyal dogs of the british. When the british left, the cowards though they could take up arms against Indians.......guess what......they got their arse kicked.

1. Nothing immoral in the way Indira Gandhi was skilled. If that was immoral then you must call Lord Krishna immoral of having Arjun kill the unarmed Bhishma, Karna, Drona or in later history even Shivaji Maratha because he killed the unarmed Afzal Khan, or Uddham Singh because he killed the unarmed Dyar.

2. Sikhs are not followers of Mahatma Gandhi. It was Sikhs who taught Gandhi during the Akali Morchas of the 1920s how to face police fire and lathi charge peacefully and in full composure. The Sant was no coward. He would have been a coward had he surrendered to the Indian army. But he stood his ground along with 150 Sikhs all of whom died fighting than surrender. They fought for 3 days against overwhelming odds against an army armed with tanks, helicopters, armored personel carriers. The Sant did all Sikhs proud. But a coward like you who can only act brave behind his computer screen would not understand this.

3. Who cares what the world thinks. If they think a Saint like Sant Bhindranwale was a terrorist and a real terrorist like Indira Gandhi was good then I could care less. All I care is what my Satguru thinks. Satguru Jee has written in Sri Guru Granth Sahib Jee that:

ਸੰਤਕੀਨਿੰਦਾਸਾਕਤਕੀਪੂਜਾਐਸੀਦ੍ਰਿੜ੍*ੀਬਿਪਰੀਤਿ॥1॥
"Such are the ways of the people in Kaliyug that Sants who stand for Dharm are slandered and Saakats who commit sins are worshiped(pooja)"

 

[Shankranthi]

1. Nothing immoral in the way Indira Gandhi was skilled. If that was immoral then you must call Lord Krishna immoral of having Arjun kill the unarmed Bhishma, Karna, Drona or in later history even Shivaji Maratha because he killed the unarmed Afzal Khan, or Uddham Singh because he killed the unarmed Dyar.

2. Sikhs are not followers of Mahatma Gandhi. It was Sikhs who taught Gandhi during the Akali Morchas of the 1920s how to face police fire and lathi charge peacefully and in full composure. The Sant was no coward. He would have been a coward had he surrendered to the Indian army. But he stood his ground along with 150 Sikhs all of whom died fighting than surrender. They fought for 3 days against overwhelming odds against an army armed with tanks, helicopters, armored personel carriers. The Sant did all Sikhs proud. But a coward like you who can only act brave behind his computer screen would not understand this.

3. Who cares what the world thinks. If they think a Saint like Sant Bhindranwale was a terrorist and a real terrorist like Indira Gandhi was good then I could care less. All I care is what my Satguru thinks. Satguru Jee has written in Sri Guru Granth Sahib Jee that:

ਸੰਤ ਕੀ ਨਿੰਦਾ ਸਾਕਤ ਕੀ ਪੂਜਾ ਐਸੀ ਦ੍ਰਿੜ੍*ੀ ਬਿਪਰੀਤਿ ॥1॥
Such are the ways of the people in Kaliyug that Sants who stand for Dharm are slandered and Saakats who commit sins are worshiped(pooja)

1. You are comparing the shameful killing of an unarmed women by cowards in her residence to killing of opponents during WAR in a BATTLEFIELD. ............your stupidity is on display.

2. Bindiwala was a coward who hid in a temple of god with guns and goons. He was found out and shot dead like the dog he was. It only took 3 days to kill him and his goons. Nothing is going to change this fact. The world knows of it and his shame is the shame of the sikhs and they will forever be branded because of the act of this coward.

3. History will be the judge of Bindiwala ........do not waste anymore of my time by discussing this disgusting bigot and coward.

 

[BATMAN]

 

[Jaggu]

1. You are comparing the shameful killing of an unarmed women by cowards in her residence to killing of opponents during WAR in a BATTLEFIELD. ............your stupidity is on display.

2. Bindiwala was a coward who hid in a temple of god with guns and goons. He was found out and shot dead like the dog he was. It only took 3 days to kill him and his goons. Nothing is going to change this fact. The world knows of it and his shame is the shame of the sikhs and they will forever be branded because of the act of this coward.

3. History will be the judge of Bindiwala ........do not waste anymore of my time by discussing this disgusting bigot and coward.

1. Study Mahabharat war. Bhisma, Karna and Drona were all unarmed in the battle field. Sri Krishna ordered Arjun to kill them because he knew otherwise they could not be killed. But according to your idiotic way of thinking you would put great warriors like Sri Krishna and Arjun as being "cowards". Shame on you!!

2. Repeating the same old crap over and over will not make it correct. A man who refused to surrender and instead chose to fight knowing he will die is no coward. Even when many of his fighters had requested him to leave for safety he refused saying he did Ardas and he is willing to become a Shaheed. As former Indian General, Gen Sinha rightly said, Bhindranwale was a brave man who fought in accordance to ancient Sikh traditions.

3. Yes, history will be judge. According to all Sikh historians who have written books on the subject of Sikh history, they place Bhindranwale in a respectful level along with historical Sikh figures like Baba Deep SIngh Jee, Baba Gurbaksh Singh Jee, Baba Banda Singh Bahadur while Indira Gandhi is regarded in the same light as Aurangzeb and Ahmad Shah Abdali.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

You know there is one thing that I have learnt in this whole process.

If Congress can run a minority government in the centre and after 26/11 can run a successive term using an anti-national motive, then NaMo can easily come to power.

Its just a matter of time.



Retaliation is not cowardice.

It is righteous.


Cowardice is knowing the enemy, knowing his actions against you, facing his actions against you and sitting and preaching peace in response.

Something which secularists do.

Not us.


That's the difference between Gandhian slaves and normal people.


Now for professing all this, I am sure you won't leave me if I were to hypothetically come and ransack your house and attack your family using some stupid ideology's name.

Same thing; at a bigger level.


We Buddhists did no harm to the Muslims until they created problems for Myanmar nationals.

Fed up of years of Islamic bullying, Buddhists in Myanmar attacked back resulting in casualties among Muslim community. Just like how the Hindus were burnt and for years rioted against when finally Godhra happened and so much destruction took place.


But now Muslims have attacked the holiest place for all the Buddhists of the world.


What do you think we should do? Kiss them?


Do you think Muslims will love you if you were to attack their holiest shrine?


Dude, Buddhism isn't spinelessness. It is peace IF peace is established. If Peace fails, war is the way.


And that's what has just started.

It's about time you started thiking India as a proper state and not some banana republic.

Just because Ram Temple was liberated from invadors, Invadors are becoming terrorist..

Should Boudhhs also become terrorirst because some one destroyed there holy plane in Bihar???

I hope they preserve your brain so that future generations can study it in detail

 

[SirHatesALot]

It's about time you started thiking India as a proper state and not some banana republic.



I hope they preserve your brain so that future generations can study it in detail

That would be waste of time and money as there is nothing to study.