Featured Indian Media Says Modi On Time 100 List, But Too Scared To Say Why

[The Accountant]

PM Modi is doing the wishes of majority of Indians .
Course correction was necessary and it is done

Right but at the cost of remaining 20%. Almost 300 million people.

 

[TNT]

No dude. This is a misconception propagated by ISI that Modi is bad for India.

Regarding CAA: Less percentage of Muslims means less the rate of subversive elements.

Regarding revoking article 370: Kashmiris would hate us either way, with or without article 370. Preserving article 370 didn't make them love us. So why not do away with this nonsense?

- PRTP GWD

As i said, how is Congress any better for Pakistan? U fail to amswer. Caa or 370 or watever, see its results, doznt affect us, on the ground situation in kashmir is worst and no better. As i said we are not stupid like u and we can better spend those billions on ourselves. Turkish money? Seriously why r u ppl so stupid?

 

[SrNair]

that is the real problem you only think Hindus as indians or those who approved hindu extremism as real indians.

We Indians will take care if it.
Why you bother?

 

[Chhatrapati]

Wrong comparison. Was Kashmir bombarded by 30+6 militaries ( NATO+CCC ) and over-run by thousands of their supported non-state terrorists ?

Libya was.

Why blame NATO when it was the Libyans who started the civil war. NATO only ended it.

I am not proposing one-party rule as that again would be not democracy. I speak of Direct Democracy where there
would be no party at all and people rule themselves directly. You can read here how that will work.

Of course the system will have to be tempered and guided by socialism because we don't want to have Haryana-style Khap Panchayats ruling us.

Your proposals are senseless and stupid. How do people rule themselves? People must follow someone to lead them. A leader must have a vision and ideas, those visions and ideas form the base of a party. That's how democracy is in the modern era.

As time passes and economy develops, these Khap panchayats will soon be gone.

There is a resurgence of socialist thought with youth leaders like Kanhaiya, Shehla and Umar. If they sit and consider successful socialist experiments around the world they will be able to apply those ideas to India.

They are way ahead of their time. We can have shehlas and Kanhaiyas when average people can understand what Paradoxical materialism is. Until then we will be ruled by politicians who can bring in investment and job opportunities for the masses. Or who speak for their community or caste or whatever. Because that's the reality of India.

 

[newb3e]

i agree with indians they choose an idiot to lead them and to the path of destruction so yeh Siri Modi g is fulfilling wishes of majority!

we must support Indians and their supremely idiotic leader!

 

[SrNair]

that is the real problem you only think Hindus as indians or those who approved hindu extremism as real indians.

We Indians will take care if it.
Why you bother?

Right but at the cost of remaining 20%. Almost 300 million people.

Oh Mr accountant where did you get that math and info.?
We Indians elected him to rule our own country .
Because we knows about our nation more than anyone else.
Who are you or any other foreigner to question our option?
Its our right to decide the leader of our nation.
Not you, Not a BD,Not Chinese, Not Nepal etc.
Besides all of the people ,including opposition, approves him , most of others are criticising him because this is a democracy

 

[SrNair]

That's truth. The good thing about you is that at least you are not hypocrite and say how it is unlike many other Indians who hide behind secularism.

Convince yourselves and cry .
Do we need the class of secularism from a Islamic Republic ? Lol

 

[The Accountant]

We Indians will take care if it.
Why you bother?


Oh Mr accountant where did you get that math and info.?
We Indians elected him to rule our own country .
Because we knows about our nation more than anyone else.
Who are you or any other foreigner to question our option?
Its our right to decide the leader of our nation.
Not you, Not a BD,Not Chinese, Not Nepal etc.
Besides all of the people ,including opposition, approves him , most of others are criticising him because this is a democracy

Dont you have manners to talk to someone to whom you disagree? WHy resorting to personal attacks? Dont have logical arguments to debate?

Yes 80% people elected to prosecute 20% of the people. We are happy as Modi is the best thing happen to India from Pakistani point of view.

Kashmir is boiling like never before
Border dispute with China is at highest levels after several decades.
Even Nepal and Bangladesh are in disagreement with indian aggressive border policies.
Mass protests by Muslim community in the country.

So yes you are free to elect Modi, free to have your opinion but it never means you can shut the mouth of others criticizing your country specially if it is about Muslim community. You tried your best but our PM exposed you last night in front of the whole world and now times magzine is trolling you and your PM.

Keep shouting but unlike innocent Kashmiri you cant stop me from speaking the truth.

 

[jamahir]

Anyway, that SFI friend now works in Goldman Sachs earning 6 figures

Ask him about Mukesh Ambani's 27-storey house for a family of four while close by in slums five to seven people live in cramped jhuggis. Even Ratan Tata has criticism for Ambani's house :

Tata Group former chairman Ratan Tata said Antilia is an example of rich Indians' lack of empathy for the poor. Tata said, "The person who lives in there should be concerned about what he sees around him and asking can he make a difference. If he is not, then it's sad because this country needs people to allocate some of their enormous wealth to finding ways of mitigating the hardship that people have.""It makes me wonder why someone would do that. That's what revolutions are made of."

Please, I have read what Gaddafi wrote some time back.

What was it about ?

Your proposals are senseless and stupid. How do people rule themselves? People must follow someone to lead them. A leader must have a vision and ideas, those visions and ideas form the base of a party. That's how democracy is in the modern era.

So you didn't read the articles I have linked to.

At least read this thread by @TaiShang from 2015 about a brief description of Libya's Direct Democracy system.

BTW, India, Britain etc are not real democracies. They are majority-rule countries. The minority whose candidate didn't get voted, they lose out on having a say in governance.

Why blame NATO when it was the Libyans who started the civil war. NATO only ended it.

You keep repeating the same error. Truth is, even if there were some real Libyans among the spark-plugs of that "insurrection" they were Al Qaeda terrorists like Abdulhakim Belhaj who were trained and supported by NATO for the express purpose of giving a chance for NATO to intervene. The Libya was long in planning.

In 2011 February or March ( I don't remember now ) when USA, UK and France were showing supposed proofs that the Libyan military was killing "civilians, including women and children" ( their wording ), Russia produced satellite imagery to prove that no such killing occurred.

A similar sequence of events happened in Syria.

As time passes and economy develops, these Khap panchayats will soon be gone.

Why not now ? Why wait for "as time passes" ? And what is the connection with economy ?

 

[Chhatrapati]

Ask him about Mukesh Ambani's 27-storey house for a family of four while close by in slums five to seven people live in cramped jhuggis. Even Ratan Tata has criticism for Ambani's house :

As the saying goes, if you're born poor it's not your fault, but if you're staying poor then it is your fault. I can do whatever I want with my money, I might as well as throw them in a lake because I earned it. Similarly, Ambani earned it.

What was it about ?

A verbatim that sounds rosy.

So you didn't read the articles I have linked to.

At least read this thread by @TaiShang from 2015 about a brief description of Libya's Direct Democracy system.

BTW, India, Britain etc are not real democracies. They are majority-rule countries. The minority whose candidate didn't get voted, they lose out on having a say in governance.

Almost all democracies in the world follow majoritarian democracy. I wouldn't take Libya as an example any day, because it's a mess. For whatever reason, Libya failed and it's the Libyans who failed their system. I don't have the time and patience to read how beautiful "was" a failed system.

You keep repeating the same error. Truth is, even if there were some real Libyans among the spark-plugs of that "insurrection" they were Al Qaeda terrorists like Abdulhakim Belhaj who were trained and supported by NATO for the express purpose of giving a chance for NATO to intervene. The Libya was long in planning.

In 2011 February or March ( I don't remember now ) when USA, UK and France were showing supposed proofs that the Libyan military was killing "civilians, including women and children" ( their wording ), Russia produced satellite imagery to prove that no such killing occurred.

A similar sequence of events happened in Syria.

Ok, so far I haven't explained in depth about your Utopia and Gaddafi. Here goes nothing, during the Utopian times almost 13% of it's public were jobless, Libya had one source of income, Oil and nothing else to show for. Even the area that Socialist Libya extracted oil from that is Cyrenaica had very poor infrastructure for it's citizens. His crazy plan was to cut down the ministry, "direct democracy", no but he remains the dictator, his family members can still loot the national treasure. To put nail on the coffin, Gaddafi decided to distribute oil wealth directly to the public.

Few gems, from the direct democracy Libya, creating a political party is punishable by death.
The movement started in 2011 when people got fed up of corruption, relating to housing scheme. The government had to step in and provide relief to the public but wasn't enough, then there happened to be similar people's movement in Tunisia and Egypt this spilled over to Libya as they wanted to oust their dictator too. The state cracked down on such dissents and it grew from there. Arab springs were people's movement, although violent in nature, but hey who knows about peaceful demonstration better than us.

There's your Utopia Libya. Went shit. What you're talking is picking all the good and rosy sides of Libya, do take time to check the dark sides of it too.

Why not now ? Why wait for "as time passes" ? And what is the connection with economy ?

Because there is no magic wand. A change take time. People are not Windows 10 where an update could fix the errors.

 

[jamahir]

during the Utopian times almost 13% of it's public were jobless

Can you give me the source for this ?

Also, in Libya people got unemployment money for the profession they trained for.

Gaddafi decided to distribute oil wealth directly to the public.

What's wrong with that ?

from the direct democracy Libya, creating a political party is punishable by death.

I read some years ago that a few party-like structures were allowed but tell me, when there is direct democracy why should parties be allowed ?

The movement started in 2011 when people got fed up of corruption, relating to housing scheme.

Source please ?

Because there is no magic wand. A change take time. People are not Windows 10 where an update could fix the errors.

What about the Cuban revolution of the 1950s ? Change happened almost overnight.

 

[American Pakistani]

Convince yourselves and cry .
Do we need the class of secularism from a Islamic Republic ? Lol

Of course not. But at least we are not hypocrites and call it Islamic Republic.