According to "Global Times" reported that
Through the Chinese and Indian prime ministers and foreign ministers of the reconciliation meeting, the recent rush of China's "vocal opposition" in the Indian media also began to reflect on the sound that open conflict between China and India costly. India, "Calcutta Telegraph," 28 days to find the root causes for such conflict, saying a number of non-ruling party in India who was trying to pour switched from 1988 Rajiv - Gandhi's visit to China has been slow but steady development of bilateral relations of the wheel of history, they "kidnapped "Sino-Indian dialogue on issues.
The first misunderstanding is that this year September 15, India, widely published in major newspapers so-called "Chinese soldiers opened fire on the Indian side," a detailed report, claiming that there are two Indian soldiers were wounded. India, however, surveys have found that there is no shooting.
The second misunderstanding is the so-called "China hamper India's candidate for UN Secretary-General." In 2006, India, Tharoor for UN Secretary-General recommended a candidate was to say that China cast a negative vote. But in fact, as early as Tharoor is recommended before the Beijing authorities had decided not to veto any candidate for Asia, and the ultimate right to veto Tharoor, only one country - the United States.
The third: the same is that some TV scholars and writers have concocted a lie --- China destroyed India's UN Security Council permanent members of the opportunity. Some media said that because China is opposed to India, Germany, Japan, Brazil, "four-nation alliance," the draft resolution, so that India no chance to become permanent members. The fact is that China was opposed to the Japanese. In fact has never supported India to become a permanent member of UN Security Council is the USA.
When the U.S. and India signed a nuclear agreement, but also a kind of rumors there --- China blocked the agreement was signed, and to prohibit the United States to India's export of nuclear technology and nuclear materials. But the fact is,China did not do that.
Although the "Calcutta Telegraph," This article can not be between China and India to resolve all misunderstandings and differences, but the "Times of India" said that China and India there is open conflict probability is very low, because the two leaders have decided to eliminate misunderstanding may be through the establishment of a "hotline" to increase mutual trust and other channels。
Through the Chinese and Indian prime ministers and foreign ministers of the reconciliation meeting, the recent rush of China's "vocal opposition" in the Indian media also began to reflect on the sound that open conflict between China and India costly. India, "Calcutta Telegraph," 28 days to find the root causes for such conflict, saying a number of non-ruling party in India who was trying to pour switched from 1988 Rajiv - Gandhi's visit to China has been slow but steady development of bilateral relations of the wheel of history, they "kidnapped "Sino-Indian dialogue on issues.
The first misunderstanding is that this year September 15, India, widely published in major newspapers so-called "Chinese soldiers opened fire on the Indian side," a detailed report, claiming that there are two Indian soldiers were wounded. India, however, surveys have found that there is no shooting.
The second misunderstanding is the so-called "China hamper India's candidate for UN Secretary-General." In 2006, India, Tharoor for UN Secretary-General recommended a candidate was to say that China cast a negative vote. But in fact, as early as Tharoor is recommended before the Beijing authorities had decided not to veto any candidate for Asia, and the ultimate right to veto Tharoor, only one country - the United States.
The third: the same is that some TV scholars and writers have concocted a lie --- China destroyed India's UN Security Council permanent members of the opportunity. Some media said that because China is opposed to India, Germany, Japan, Brazil, "four-nation alliance," the draft resolution, so that India no chance to become permanent members. The fact is that China was opposed to the Japanese. In fact has never supported India to become a permanent member of UN Security Council is the USA.
When the U.S. and India signed a nuclear agreement, but also a kind of rumors there --- China blocked the agreement was signed, and to prohibit the United States to India's export of nuclear technology and nuclear materials. But the fact is,China did not do that.
Although the "Calcutta Telegraph," This article can not be between China and India to resolve all misunderstandings and differences, but the "Times of India" said that China and India there is open conflict probability is very low, because the two leaders have decided to eliminate misunderstanding may be through the establishment of a "hotline" to increase mutual trust and other channels。
are sure ? does it mean Indians are more intrested in warmongering?
