Interesting ... are you advocating for covert (terrorist attacks supported by India, which Pakistan alleges that India is already engaging in by supporting the TTP and Baloch terrorist groups) or overt military clashes across the LoC/WB?
It could also be covert targeted assassinations of key perpetrators like those used to be seen during cold war era. But personally, given Modi and BJP's headset, the approach would be more around non violent reprisals like punitive economic policies (like those seen in the times of N. Rao's govt) and "accidental" violations of IWT that cant be proven.
Unless Modi gives in to the knee jerk reaction of a visible violent reaction. Though I doubt that.
And if the "hit materializes", it could also just be one of the increasingly infrequent successful attempts by the TTP to carry out terrorist attacks, like the one at Wagah ...
The TTP and associated groups have not given up trying to carry out terrorist attacks, and they are far from completely destroyed, and all it takes is one successful attempt to make the headlines. Now, if you really want to claim credit for India/Doval over a terrorist attack, especially one on civilians given the context of your post, go ahead ... I for one continue to reject the Indian allegations that the Pakistani State supported these recent insurgent attacks in any material fashion.
Dude, you need to read my post in context of my original post. You and I (at least I) are not in a position to guarantee the approach being followed by the Pak or Indian govt. Till now, I have 0% belief in the Pakistani claims about India supporting TTP. But if the events in J&K are swiftly followed by a similar hit in Pakistan, that belief of mine will certainly be shaken. Do I want it ? Certainly not. Not because of any love lost for Pakistan, but simply because that sullies the image of India in the international community (like what has happened to Pakistan). But given the timing and the size of the terror strike in J&K, I am not sure if the doves in the govt will win this one.
Actually this Muck Fodi thing is derived from an Indian not Pakistani. It was his user name on Twitter. As for Jinnah. You are not doing this because you can't afford to do it here. And it is stupid to compare Jinnah with someone like Modi.
There is a difference of intellect. One formed a nation country while other thinks that Indians were the inventors of plastic surgery because they believe in some god with head of an elephant.
Dude, I dont care about the origin, but who I see using it. I can find 100 such comments about Jinnah and Pakistan in general that have originated from Pakistan. My using them here does not absolve me from buying into the bigotry just because they originated in Pakistan
When American bombed Japan in 40's it was the american govt that was responsible, not Einstein who gave birth to the theory that resulted in the Bomb.
Anyway, I agree. No comparison between Jinnah and Modi. Jinnah was responsible for Pakistan and See the state of Pakistan today
.. Some nation country ..
@karan.1970
The equivalent to 'Muck Fodi' would be 'Suck Fharif'' or 'Zuck Fardari' ... Indians are free to use either ...
Why do you say that? Its not a middle ages duel that a PM can fight a PM and a father of the nation can fight a father of the nation.
And really, saying Suck Fharif is like actually supporting
@Areesh POV
Please, I spend way too much time here to know exactly the amount of human filth that comes from India here as well.
Whatever....
oh pls dont go to Mr Jinnah, do whatever you want with NS or IK, but if you go to Jinnah i will go to Guck Fandhi and Nuck Fehru
Please do..
