TopCat
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 15,736
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Fact was stated with enough evidence even from State Bank of India.You cannot reply back with facts, now you want to become personal. Signs of a looser.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fact was stated with enough evidence even from State Bank of India.You cannot reply back with facts, now you want to become personal. Signs of a looser.
Maybe it is. However, certain parts of Karachi are filled to the brim with illegal Bengali Bangladeshis...
BTW anyone can also check here:
http://www.pewglobal.org/interactives/remittance-map/
Poor BD, no one believes them
Fact was stated with enough evidence even from State Bank of India.
No link will be entertained to a certified troll. Try visiting State Bank of India. They have the data for remittance sending country.where??.....give me the link..
bro u have to understand one thing. They went pakistan before even BD was created. They did not want BD. So u can't call them Bangladeshi. Fact is they are pakistani bengalis. They are well integrated to pakistan's culture.
Most recent migrants are Rohingya.No, Arefin007.
Almost all of them immigrated after "BD" was created. They are therefore illegal immigrants. The have no identification to prove their citizenship (unlike others), and will tell you themselves that they immigrated in the 1980s and early 1990s. It is they themselves who let everyone know that they immigrated and want citizenship.
You can tell yourself whatever you want, but the truth is the truth. The Pakistani government has confirmed this as well (along with residents of Karachi who noticed a huge influx of Bengali immigrants that weren't there before). They are not Pakistani citizens, period. And they don't have the rights of a citizen, as a result.
Most recent migrants are Rohingya.
In 70s and 80s there were migration for uniting the split family. Both biharis and bengalis went there.
I dont think any Bangladeshi will migrate to Pakistan considering the econonic scenario now.
We all need to move on and rather enjoy the diversity.
Those bengalis could be reminder of the history that we were once together.
Almost all of them immigrated after "BD" was created.
Well majority of them came during 80s and start of 90s. There is a reason they don't have Pakistan nationality.Almost all of them immigrated after "BD" was created.
'Almost all of them' any proof?
After our independence a number of bengalis migrated to pakistan because they didn't want bangladesh to born. They wanted to be pakistani. ya i saw that video couple of years back. I don't feel bad for them they deserve it. Life could be much much better if they decide to stay or come back to the land they belong to.
'very few Bengalis have immigrated in the 21st century' may be a little number of jamaties. Not for other reasons for sure.
yes man truth is truth. I always except the truth no matter if it is distasteful to me
Well majority of them came during 80s and start of 90s. There is a reason they don't have Pakistan nationality.
Coming from the guy who has made what .....20+ accounts now? @LA se Karachi
So yeah your govt is trash (as evidenced in corruption perception index and multiple comments from anti-BD govt Bangladeshis in this forum), so anything released by it concerning development or economic data is equally trashy if not more so.
Now take the pew global map that reaches to the global readership infinitely more than corrupt BAL release and have a good cry about it.
I'll post it just to make sure anyone passing through gets the real figures and not BBS-type figures (which often get asterisks saying pending re-analysis when used at the UN).
http://www.pewglobal.org/interactives/remittance-map/
Outgoing form BD:
Incoming to BD:
Its what the world gets to see (the truth - anathema to BBS and BAL)
The figures you are showing are mere estimates, not actual figures. The actual figures could be obtained from the central banks of the respective countries.
You have missed out the intro where it says, " Because these numbers are estimates, there is some room for error. For example, the total incoming or outgoing remittances for some countries may not be the same as actual remittances."
Now how they came up with these figures? It's actually based on the migration patterns in the South-South regions. Since India claims that they host millions of Bangladeshis (without any proper evidence), the estimate shows India as the source of highest remittance flow to Bangladesh, which is just a speculation. The estimate is primarily based on the paper which you repeatedly post here, written by Dilip Ratha. They didn't take the actual financial transactions into account.
In short, this estimate has as much value as the prediction of India becoming a super power. This is why I say you have a pretty low comprehension and analytical ability.
The figures you are showing are mere estimates, not actual figures. The actual figures could be obtained from the central banks of the respective countries.
You have missed out the intro where it says, " Because these numbers are estimates, there is some room for error. For example, the total incoming or outgoing remittances for some countries may not be the same as actual remittances."
Now how they came up with these figures? It's actually based on the migration patterns in the South-South regions. Since India claims that they host millions of Bangladeshis (without any proper evidence), the estimate shows India as the source of highest remittance flow to Bangladesh, which is just a speculation. The estimate is primarily based on the paper which you repeatedly post here, written by Dilip Ratha. They didn't take the actual financial transactions into account.
In short, this estimate has as much value as the prediction of India becoming a super power. This is why I say you have a pretty low comprehension and analytical ability.