What's new

Indian Economy-News & Updates

How is the plan?

  • Good

    Votes: 161 61.7%
  • Average

    Votes: 53 20.3%
  • Poor

    Votes: 47 18.0%

  • Total voters
    261
Thats a monthly y.o.y by nominal USD because of much lower oil prices (and India is a big oil refiner exporter) A month does not equal a whole years performance.

Besides, Export volumes are doing steady and fine...though can be doing much better....but theres a big uphill task left over from the previous crappy congress regime....w.r.t lack of competitiveness and credit crunch for private companies. Both carry weighty inertia that may take another year or two to resolve fully.


Why is your "Much lower oil price" theory not applicable to other countries of the world, who are also in the same boat?
Are you telling us that India is (ONLY) one of the country in the world that gets special crude prices?
What kind of a eyewash is this my friend?

Export figures are always quoted in nominal dollars and not PPP.
Everything is same for the year 2015, that was there in 2014.
So what is new dish from your side, that you want to serve us as a chief cook here?

Nearly half the export numbers have been wiped off, and you are saying India is doing fine?
Blaming congress,? Trying to justify Modi? Trying to give it a political color?

Well here also you are drawing a blank:

sig48.png



Please do not bring forth any (more) such unwarranted & balderdash dialogue further to blame certain political parties, and glorify others when the chips are down.

People are able to separate the chaff from the grain.

Exports are down by 45% and we hear from people like you India is doing fine?

My foot.

Should you lack a wisdom tooth, I can Fedex you, but do not bring Red Herring types here and jeopardize your own image by using a "word jugglery" to bolster your dialogue in a futile bid.

Word to the wise should suffice.
 
Why is your "Much lower oil price" theory not applicable to other countries of the world, who are also in the same boat?
Are you telling us that India is (ONLY) one of the country in the world that gets special crude prices?
What kind of a eyewash is this my friend?

Export figures are always quoted in nominal dollars and not PPP.
Everything is same for the year 2015, that was there in 2014.
So what is new dish from your side, that you want to serve us as a chief cook here?

Nearly half the export numbers have been wiped off, and you are saying India is doing fine?
Blaming congress,? Trying to justify Modi? Trying to give it a political color?

Wow you are a pretty retarded idiot to think one month represents one year. Such facepalm.

You think India has never before seen export crunch before...that too on a monthly y.o.y basis?

And I have no idea where you are pulling this 45% monthly dip number from? Congress party?:omghaha::omghaha:

How about check a REAL source first?

Exports dip 17.5% in October; trade deficit narrows - timesofindia-economictimes

FROM:

Exports fall for 10th straight month, down 24% in Sept | Business Standard News

For the first half of this financial year, exports stood at $132.09 billion, while imports were worth $200.9 billion, a trade deficit of $68 billion. Exports were down 17.6 per cent during the period year-on-year, while imports over 14 per cent.

So in a half year period, the value of exports has come down 18%. So we might end up with about 270 - 280 billion USD or so for the full financial year (from about 340 billion last year). Not A FRIGGING 45% ENTIRE DROP LIKE YOU ARE CLAIMING. That would mean we only get to 190 billion for the entire year...and NO ONE is predicting that....maybe your ill-educated ill-informed congress is.

Whatever you are, you are a big waste of time it seems.

Comparing with the global situation:

Shrinking trade puts pressure on emerging market growth, investment| Reuters

and India's reliance on oil exports:

India's Top 10 Exports - World's Top Exports

It is quite apparent that the benefits to C (from the oil price drop) are quite offsett by the drop in X in C+I+G+(X-M)...if you even know what that is.

There is always a lag period in the multiplier effect and associated velocities of spending and investment from lower input oil prices...especially if we are going to restrict ourselves to looking at only the export sector. The credit crunch within India has to be eased, capacity utilisation has to be given time to respond to the stimulus investment and govt spending....... for the benefits of lower oil prices to properly transfer to non-oil exports. Then on top of this their global prices and overall demand also have to increase. An idiot like you of course would barely understand any of this.

As for this stupid graph:

sig48-png.273674


Its obviously been done in current prices that takes no account for inflation and therefore is next to meaningless. Try find something more useful to present next time and we can talk.

I am talking about actual structural reform to the economy with long term vision in mind. Not riding off the momentum of Vajpayee NDA and ultimately running out of ideas, creating a massive credit squeeze and fiscally precarious situation....and hoping mediocre AND top heavy growth will somehow trickle down beyond the inefficient govt spending programs.

Maybe thats all gobbledegook to you as well.... who knows.

World trade is actually majorly SHRINKING with time this year in regards to total value.

World trade suffers biggest fall in 6 years - FT.com

This is from direct period to period....not year on year.

We can only analyse India's performance w.r.t the World at the end of the financial year.
 
Last edited:
@Nilgiri

And I have no idea where you are pulling this 45% monthly dip number from?

Now feigning ignorance? Escape rout?

Oye birdbrain, these are 12 months numbers/figures.
Read the newspapers clearly unless you have Attention Deficit Syndrome or better still, go for an Encephalography. I will foot the bill.


Digressing with monthly figures instead of yearly figure?
Bringing in unwarranted links to muddy the water to your advantage?
These cheap shots are well known tactics to pre-empt your opponent.

Nothing of my own, these are the stats thrown by mainstream media:
Let the ZeeNews explain:
Excerpt:

18 months tenure is a whopping drop of 44.89 percent in Indian exports, from 280 billion dollars in May 2014 to 154 billion dollars today,"
^
Above is the final nail in this dialogues coffin as for 45% figure is concerned.

Refuting the obvious (12 month 45% export decline) and calling others retard?
Its like pissing on my feet and telling its raining?

People like you are dime a dozen, but I refuse to construct a tunnel for you to see the light at the end of it.

I can take a horse to the river, but can not make it drink.

Welcome to my Ignore club you Modi toady "ninny".
 
So looks like a congress spokesperson said it:

"After 30 foreign visits and another four lined-up, all that Modi has achieved for the nation during his 18 months tenure is a whopping drop of 44.89 per cent in Indian exports, from 280 billion dollars in May 2014 to 154 billion dollars today," Congress spokesman Abhishek Singhvi told reporters.

Exports fall by 45 pc despite Modi's 30 foreign trips: Cong | Business Standard News

Too bad the ACTUAL FIGURES dont back him up.

280 billion dollars in just May 2014? So we were exporting just that much in one month?

280 billion dollars pulled from his ***, 154 billion dollars pulled from his ***.

Such a reputable guy this Singhvi:

Congress' Abhishek Manu Singhvi quits party, Parliament posts

:rofl::rofl:

If each month averages to a 20% drop from the month the year before.....you are gonna predict the yearly total is going to be a 45% drop? That too 154 billion for the whole year when 132 billion has already been completed in just HALF a year. So we are gonna export just 22 billion for the remaining 6 months put together. Congressi maths I guess.

OH now I figured it out, the philandering dumbass quoted the 7 month period as an entire year

Exports dip 17.5% in October; trade deficit narrows - timesofindia-economictimes

Exports in the first seven months of the year were about $154.2 billion. In 2014-15, India's exports had totalled $310.5 billion.

So the first 7 months of the previous year were approx 310/12 * 7 = 180 billion. And this dumbass has added 100 billion to make it 280 billion :dance3::dance3::dance3:.So SMRT.:laugh:
 
Rise in oil consumption hints at likely economic liftoff - The Economic Times

MUMBAI: A bunch of key barometers of economic health has shown steady improvement in the past months, an encouraging sign that growth may be finally picking up momentum.

Commercial vehicle sales, a key indicator to activity in the economy, have been buoyant of late. While passenger vehicle sales have also been up, consumption of petrol and diesel has surged as crude prices have remained soft. Sales of petrol by volume have been rising for three months in a row, diesel by two and passenger cars for seven.

1.jpg


More at the link.

@Dungeness

Indian Railways:- The High Returns Investment Destination


Interview with G.E's chief included in there.
 
So looks like a congress spokesperson said it:

"After 30 foreign visits and another four lined-up, all that Modi has achieved for the nation during his 18 months tenure is a whopping drop of 44.89 per cent in Indian exports, from 280 billion dollars in May 2014 to 154 billion dollars today," Congress spokesman Abhishek Singhvi told reporters.

Exports fall by 45 pc despite Modi's 30 foreign trips: Cong | Business Standard News

Too bad the ACTUAL FIGURES dont back him up.

280 billion dollars in just May 2014? So we were exporting just that much in one month?

280 billion dollars pulled from his ***, 154 billion dollars pulled from his ***.

Such a reputable guy this Singhvi:

Congress' Abhishek Manu Singhvi quits party, Parliament posts

:rofl::rofl:

If each month averages to a 20% drop from the month the year before.....you are gonna predict the yearly total is going to be a 45% drop? That too 154 billion for the whole year when 132 billion has already been completed in just HALF a year. So we are gonna export just 22 billion for the remaining 6 months put together. Congressi maths I guess.

OH now I figured it out, the philandering dumbass quoted the 7 month period as an entire year

Exports dip 17.5% in October; trade deficit narrows - timesofindia-economictimes

Exports in the first seven months of the year were about $154.2 billion. In 2014-15, India's exports had totalled $310.5 billion.

So the first 7 months of the previous year were approx 310/12 * 7 = 180 billion. And this dumbass has added 100 billion to make it 280 billion :dance3::dance3::dance3:.So SMRT.:laugh:
Exports may slip below $300 bn in FY16: Official - The Economic Times
 
No policy paralysis: GDP to touch 8 per cent this year: Arvind Panagariya

NITI Aayog Vice Chairman Arvind Panagariya says the economic growth this year may touch eight per cent due to implementation of various critical economic reforms.

No policy paralysis: GDP to touch 8 per cent this year: Arvind Panagariya | The Financial Express

Rejecting criticism that the policy paralysis has returned to haunt the NDA in view of critical legislations getting stuck in Parliament, NITI Aayog Vice Chairman Arvind Panagariya says the economic growth this year may touch eight per cent due to implementation of various critical economic reforms.

He asserts that projects are being cleared and gathering speed and ease of doing business has improved.

“In the last quarter meaning January to March, 2016, I expect that we would touch eight per cent mark, hopefully cross it a bit,” he told PTI here in an interview.

He said the economic growth for the entire year is expected to be at 7.5 per cent to eight per cent.

“We might get full eight per cent because I also expect the first quarter growth rate which has been at seven per cent for 2015-16 will be revised upwards,” he said.

“We will continue to make progress. When we come to the last year of the present term of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, I would expect it would be near the double digit,” he said.

Panagariya, who is in Beijing for talks with China’s key think-tank the Development Research Centre on the status of the Sino-Indian economies, strongly denied criticism that the policy paralysis is creeping into the Modi government in view of government’s inability to push through important legislations like GST Bill and Land Acquisition bills.

“I do not buy that. If you actually look at what the government has done, it is not the UPA government in operation. If the UPA government policies were continued we would have remained at five per cent or below. We have come out of it,” he said.

“The policy paralysis has been eliminated completely from the government. Three is a well functioning government at the centre,” Panagariya said.

“The Prime Minster himself single handedly has made huge effort due to which we have moved up 12 places in the (World Banks’s ease of doing business) rankings. This does not take a lot of changes into account because the changes have been made after the World Bank has completed its survey,” he said.

“So you will see a much greater jump in the next round,” he added.
 
Last edited:
Govt readies new policy on start-ups - Livemint

Govt readies new policy on start-ups

Policy will focus on manufacturing, seek to promote innovation, will offer tax sops to small unlisted start-ups

Jayant%20Sinha1-kUj--621x414@LiveMint.jpg


New Delhi: The government is working on a new start-up policy that will focus on manufacturing, seek to promote innovation, and also offer tax incentives to small unlisted start-ups.

The aim, a government official familiar with the matter and speaking on condition of anonymity said, is to build an entire “ecosystem”, not merely offer incentives. The policy will focus on other issues as well, such as the ease of doing business, compliance and exits, this person added.

And it will all start with a definition.

Minister of state for finance Jayant Sinha is holding an inter-ministerial meeting on Thursday to come up with a definition of a start-up. Several tech entrepreneurs are expected to attend the meeting.

The definition is important to understand who will “come under the ambit” of the policy, the government official said.

The Start-up India policy (Mint’s name, not the government’s) will be unveiled by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in January. It is being prepared by the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, or DIPP.

Since coming to power in May 2014, the Bharatiya Janata Party-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government has launched series of programmes (Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, Make in India, Skill India, etc.) to achieve its objectives. In August, while delivering the Independence Day address from the ramparts of the Red Fort, Modi proposed the slogan “Start-up India, Stand up India” to encourage innovation and entrepreneurship among young people.

Speaking at a start-up event at San Jose, California, on 27 September, Modi said he sees start-ups, technology and innovation as exciting and effective instruments for India’s transformation, and for creating jobs for its youth. “When each of the 500-odd towns produces 10 start-ups and each of our 600,000 villages produce six small businesses, on a regular basis, we will create an enormous economic momentum and generate huge number of jobs in our country,” Modi had said. Adding that some of the outstanding start-ups from India are applying technology to transform areas such as healthcare, education, agriculture, clean energy, security, financial inclusion, and water management, Modi said he wants to see the idea and spirit of start-ups light up the economies and the fortunes of people in rural India.

“From handicrafts to tourism, the frontiers of possibilities and the scale of reach in India is immense,” he said.

Sharad Sharma, co-founder of iSpirt, a lobby group for software product start-ups, said the idea of the policy is to stop the exodus of Indian start-ups to places like Singapore and the US and encourage innovation-led start-ups, but recommended that the government not get fixated with a singular definition.

“Having one definition can be complicated. Defining eligibility criteria for benefits, such as incubation facility, easy labour laws, help in applying patents may be more useful,” he added.

The government official cited above stressed that the policy would focus on “manufacturing and innovation” to ensure that “someone opening a flour mill cannot claim benefits”.

And “listed firms will not be eligible for benefits under the policy,” he added. The focus, the official said, is on small companies.

The DIPP has spoken to several people from the emerging start-up ecosystem in India on what they would like to see in the policy. “We have a good idea about the requirements of start-ups. A final decision on the incentives will be taken by the prime minister’s office and the cabinet,” the official added.

A spokesperson of e-commerce firm Snapdeal said that start-ups in technology and capital-intensive industries, such as e-commerce, software, logistics, biotechnology and infrastructure, require substantial infusion of funding at various inflection points of their growth cycle, which often leads to change in shareholding patterns.

“Such changes in shareholding make them ineligible to carry forward their losses under the Income Tax Act. Start-ups need to be given greater flexibility to carry forward losses, provided the management by original founders continues. This will encourage start-ups to make the required investments in the early stages without such decisions being prejudiced by short-term considerations,” he added.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom