Indian border forces allegedly kill 2 Bangladeshis

[American Pakistani]

99% percent of those who get shot are smugglers. No point shedding tears for low-lives.
BSF does not enter BD territory to shoot.
I am supportive of BGB shooting smugglers from behind.

So they are your judge jury and executioner?

 

[mmr]

Its funny they only kill cattle smugglers but not drug or arms smugglers. I guess its come down to money.

 

[Imran Khan]

99% percent of those who get shot are smugglers. No point shedding tears for low-lives.
BSF does not enter BD territory to shoot.
I am supportive of BGB shooting smugglers from behind.

 

[sohail.ishaque]

99% percent of those who get shot are smugglers. No point shedding tears for low-lives.
BSF does not enter BD territory to shoot.
I am supportive of BGB shooting smugglers from behind.

wow. what an explanation you have provided. I think India should hire you to deal with all the bangladeshi concerns over civilians death.

I have just one question, why u prefer to take Indian bullets for your smugglers rather then Bangladeshi ? I mean why your agencies don't deal with the smugglers and when someone got shot on the border, you just start thanking the Indians that they must have killed a smuggler.

I am so thankful to Almight Allah that i am living in Pakistan and that our forces do respond instead of giving silly explanations. Even if they had to go in the Indian territory and to behead the Indian fkers, they do it and make examples of the indians.

 

[Daghalodi]

99% percent of those who get shot are smugglers. No point shedding tears for low-lives.
BSF does not enter BD territory to shoot.
I am supportive of BGB shooting smugglers from behind.

 

[VikingRaider]

99% percent of those who get shot are smugglers. No point shedding tears for low-lives.

But you can't just shoot smugglers at sight. It's not justice, is it? Even if you want to impose strict law, you only can kill when someone is proved to be a murderer.

So the punishment of smuggling can't be shoot at sight.

exactly bro
you have earned my respect

Will you give BGB the same respect if they exactly follow the path of BSF?

Smuggling hurts people's health and the economy due to lack of quality control, duty evasion and posing unfair competition for local producers.

You can arrest them, give custody punishment. but can't shoot them if they are not smuggling women or babies (or drugs at least) . BSF shoot cow smuggler, and that's savage act! Capital punishment for cow smuggling is just savage!

 

[suyog chavan]

But you can't just shoot smugglers at sight. It's not justice, is it? Even if you want to impose strict law, you only can kill when someone is proved to be a murderer.

So the punishment of smuggling can't be shoot at sight.

you are right bro its injustice .
but following the dense vegetation of indo-bangla border .
forces cant distinguish a smuggler whether its a cow smuggler or drugs smuggler or human traffiking.
they rather shoot than let them go away free hand.

Will you give BGB the same respect if they exactly follow the path of BSF?

yeah why not ?

You can arrest them, give custody punishment. but can't shoot them if they are not smuggling women or babies (or drugs at least) . BSF shoot cow smuggler, and that's savage act! Capital punishment for cow smuggling is just savage

you know what's the philosophy of this smugglers .
today they will smuggle cow if not dealt firmly tommorow they will smuggle kids and women , and dayafter tommorow maybe drugs and weapons thats the reason examples have to be set.
we rather leave this low life smugglers shot , be it from INDIA or BANGLADESH .
we common people should not determine the level of smugglers by saying good smugglers or bad smuggler.

 

[VikingRaider]

you are right bro its injustice .

Thanks that you recognized it as injustice.

forces cant distinguish a smuggler whether its a cow smuggler or drugs smuggler or human traficcing.
they rather shoot than let them go away free hand.

But they should increase man power and technology then doesn't matter how is the expense. Life of human being is the priceless. Assume that a poor man only want few extra cash by smuggling cows because he has no other way to earn some extra cash.

What will be the fate of his family is he shoot to dead? Not only his life is ended, but a full family will suffer. And where hunger is predominant, morality will is a loser fighter. So how will the family survive? They will commit more crime for their hunger and border security will have to invest more to take care of them . So isn't problem increasing?

you know what's the philosophy of this smugglers .
today they will smuggle cow if not dealt firmly tommorow they will smuggle kids and women , and dayafter tommorow maybe drugs and weapons thats the reason examples have to be set.

But is capital punishment applicable on them before committing the crime? A baby born as sinless, and we can't just destroy it if it born in a criminal family ( assuming that the baby will follow his/her family tradition) Can we?

In the end, no punishment should be given before a person already committed the crime!

Even if shooting is necessary to stop someone, a leg shoot is enough to stop them!

 

[suyog chavan]

But they should increase man power and technology then doesn't matter how is the expense. Life of human being is the priceless. Assume that a poor man only want few extra cash by smuggling cows because he has no other way to earn some extra cash.

What will be the fate of his family is he shoot to dead? Not only his life is ended, but a full family will suffer. And where hunger is predominant, morality will is a loser fighter. So how will the family survive? They will commit more crime for their hunger and border security will have to invest more to take care of them . So isn't problem increasing?

no poor man who loves his family will try to smuggle across borders . he would better work 24 hours rather than choosing this path. what if you assume the smuggler is a human trafficker , than what about the lives of those who are being trafficked across border. there may be kids women old men and women. isnt them pricless.

But is capital punishment applicable on them before committing the crime? A baby born as sinless, and we can't just destroy it if it born in a criminal family. Can we?

but criminals destroy the peace living common people ,
and question is not the baby born in criminal family its the way he chose.
and offcourse new tech and enforcements be increased in border areas to limit such incidents.
but dont assume this smugglers as innocents they are mostly criminals who dont have better option than smuggling.

 

[VikingRaider]

what if you assume the smuggler is a human trafficker , than what about the lives of those who are being trafficked across border. there may be kids women old men and women. isnt them pricless.

Simply shoot at leg, it's easier than head shot. Shoot them on leg ( if necessary then both leg), and then capture them. If they are human trafficker, then they will have consequence in court!
Killing is not necessary while you can catch anyone by shooting on leg!

but dont assume this smugglers as innocents they are mostly criminals who dont have better option than smuggling.

Indeed they are criminal. Did I say that they are not criminal?

 

[suyog chavan]

Simply shoot at leg, it's easier than head shot. Shoot them on leg ( if necessary then both leg), and then capture them. If they are human trafficker, then they will have consequence in court!
Killing is not necessary while you can catch anyone by shooting on leg

BSF must have tried that .
but as i say its dense vegetation on border with addition to smugglers are not constant or stationary to aim at legs .
BSF doesnt enjoy killing random people.
smugglers must have resisted in the sense