What's new

Indian Army Top brass serving own agenda

Spring Onion

PDF VETERAN
Joined
Feb 1, 2006
Messages
41,399
Reaction score
19
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Top brass serving own agenda: AV Singh
Hindustan Times
Email Author
New Delhi, September 24, 2007
First Published: 01:24 IST(24/9/2007)
Last Updated: 01:30 IST(24/9/2007)


Criticising the three service chiefs for scampering to grab the bulk of the new 156 general-rank posts recommended by the AV Singh committee, former defence secretary Ajai Vikram Singh has said the military top brass is following its own self-serving agenda.

He said the myopic focus on usurping more posts had defeated the most crucial objective of the report — ‘peeling off’ or releasing officers before their careers stagnate.

Singh told HT, “The most significant recommendation was to increase the intake of short service commissioned officers and have fewer regular officers. The former would leave before reaching higher ranks and the ‘peel off’ would reduce stagnation in the long term.”

Proposing a complete reversal in the intake ratio of officers, the report recommended that the army take in 1,100 short service officers and 500 regular officers every year, against the existing practice of commissioning 1,000 regular and 500 short service officers.

Lt Gen H.S. Bagga (retd), who co-authored the report, agreed that modifying the intake formula was the principal recommendation. “Over 50 per cent of officers would have ‘peeled off’ before reaching stagnation. If the report is implemented in its entirety, the army may not actually need all the 20 new posts of lieutenant generals or 75 major generals,” explained Bagga, adding that the report’s implementation had been “messed up”.

Singh and General Bagga are willing to make a presentation to Defence Minister AK Antony, who wants to speed up implementation of the report. But Antony’s plans have hit a roadblock, with the three service chiefs taking an openly confrontationist stance to corner more posts. The first phase of the report was implemented three ago but Singh said “the implementation process has been distorted. Dividing the report into phases has done more harm than good by causing more stagnation.”

Focused on the army, the report had recommended 1,484 news posts for colonels, 222 for brigadiers, 75 for major generals and 20 for lieutenant generals. The air force and the navy were asked to devise a matching formula to maintain parity in rank structure.


http://www.hindustantimes.com/storypage/storypage.aspx?id=a3a8f794-49e2-4ce2-93b1-04e04bb09cb1&&Headline='Three+service+chiefs+grabbing+posts'
 
Who says only our generals stick to their agenda ;)
 
What did you understand? Pls do explain.
 
Bull what did you understand ??
would you explian ?


The main thing was to avoide stagnation in ranks.
isnt it?
BTW i was not talking about political agenda
 
Bull what did you understand ??
would you explian ?


The main thing was to avoide stagnation in ranks.
isnt it?
BTW i was not talking about political agenda

Well i didnt understand anything at all. So pls explain, looks like u read it and understood something. So pls explain it so that we can discuss abt it, thats if there is something to be discussed at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom