Don't let your Indian dead soldiers cheapens the word martyr. The losers in a battle got killed. Simple as that.
It wasn't a battle, it was an ambush. There is a difference. And yes they died, rather than surrendering half their country and themselves. Which is what your army is famous for.
![OMG HAHA :omghaha: :omghaha:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/15042.gif)
"Kat gaye sar hamaare to kuch gam nahin
Sar himalay ka hamne na jhukne diya."
That's the code they lived by, and died by. I don't expect you to understand that, since in your country, the losers who surrender by the tens of thousands, and lose half their country, are revered.
For your information - THIS is losing:
![surrender2.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fmygoldenbengal.files.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F03%2Fsurrender2.jpg%3Fw%3D400%26h%3D250&hash=ee90d0e44c7653f5df42a8e39315cb9c)
![250px-1971_Surrender_of_Pakistan.gif](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fen%2Fthumb%2F4%2F42%2F1971_Surrender_of_Pakistan.gif%2F250px-1971_Surrender_of_Pakistan.gif&hash=a3723ed8dacf6756a91d146945d83fec)
![paksurr.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fzaainbokhari.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F08%2Fpaksurr.jpg&hash=66f84d0296e8c9e4466a9db6175e8249)
This is honorable martyrdom, for which a grateful nation justifiably revers them:
![1252645630777-indian%20army.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fphotos.merinews.com%2Fupload%2FimageGallery%2FbigImage%2F1252645630777-indian%2520army.jpg&hash=c2da8101fb4734ea51dfd6b1826d96c0)
But then I can't expect you to understand the difference, since even pathetic and humiliating defeats are described as victories in la-la land. It's quite simple, I'll explain once more:
1) Soldier dying in the line of duty - martyr.
2) Soldiers surrendering themselves and their country - losers.
3) Soldiers ambushing neighboring soldiers during a declared ceasefire - cowardice and treachery.
Clear enough?