Don't let your Indian dead soldiers cheapens the word martyr. The losers in a battle got killed. Simple as that.
It wasn't a battle, it was an ambush. There is a difference. And yes they died, rather than surrendering half their country and themselves. Which is what your army is famous for.
"Kat gaye sar hamaare to kuch gam nahin
Sar himalay ka hamne na jhukne diya."
That's the code they lived by, and died by. I don't expect you to understand that, since in your country, the losers who surrender by the tens of thousands, and lose half their country, are revered.
For your information - THIS is losing:
This is honorable martyrdom, for which a grateful nation justifiably revers them:
But then I can't expect you to understand the difference, since even pathetic and humiliating defeats are described as victories in la-la land. It's quite simple, I'll explain once more:
1) Soldier dying in the line of duty - martyr.
2) Soldiers surrendering themselves and their country - losers.
3) Soldiers ambushing neighboring soldiers during a declared ceasefire - cowardice and treachery.
Clear enough?