India: World's Largest Mobocracy

[letsrock]

There is no dispute that Babar destroyed the Ram temple to build the Mosque and Hindus destroyed the mosque built by Babar to make way to rebuild the Ram temple.

I do not think anyone disputes this.

Yes - There is no dispute that BABAR destroyed the mosque 500 years but there is no evidence that any of the 32 people chargesheeted in babri demolition case destroyed the mosque. Thats what your indian judicial system says. Jokers of the world.

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

Moreover, even if someone destroyed Ram's temple 400 years ago, why can't he be forgiven like those who destroyed Babri in 1992 have been forgiven?

I never supported destruction of Babri masjid.

It is living evidence that should have been preserved with utmost care to educate generations of Hindus to come on the atrocities committed by the erst while Islamic rulers on their Hindu subjects.

My policy is always forgive but never forget.

Hopefully Hindus will not make the same mistake with Kashi and Mathura mosques built on destructed Hindu temples like they did with Babri Masjid.

 

[IsThisNameAvailable]

Those who are burning at this judgement are burning since few years now. Let them.

The court has ruled that "the destruction was not a planned act but an spontaneous one". Which means that, if accountability has to be fixed, it has to be on the entire crowd and NOT on an individual.

The court did not say that no one is accountable. Or that the mosque fell automatically.

The court said that the 32 INDIVIDUALS are not responsible.

Some low iq sickulars have tweeted that "babri apne aap gir gayi thi". You can burn but dont display your low iq please.

 

[letsrock]

Those who are burning at this judgement are burning since few years now. Let them.

The court has ruled that "the destruction was not a planned act but an spontaneous one". Which means that, if accountability has to be fixed, it has to be on the entire crowd and NOT on an individual.

The court did not say that no one is accountable. Or that the mosque fell automatically.

The court said that the 32 INDIVIDUALS are not responsible.

Some low iq sickulars have tweeted that "babri apne aap gir gayi thi". You can burn but dont display your low iq please.

Are they Not responsible ? they are the ones who built an entire political movement on it, rallied crowds "ek dhakka aur dho". But no there are not responsible for your jokey courts and jokey fellows like you. But babar 500 years ago individually destroyed it - morons.

 

[xeuss]

I never supported destruction of Babri masjid.

Surely then you will agree that the destruction of the Babri Masjid was a crime and the criminals should be punished. You should join me in lamenting this travesty of justice that unfolded, where the criminals were acquitted.

 

[xeuss]

Those who are burning at this judgement are burning since few years now. Let them.

The court has ruled that "the destruction was not a planned act but an spontaneous one". Which means that, if accountability has to be fixed, it has to be on the entire crowd and NOT on an individual.

The court did not say that no one is accountable. Or that the mosque fell automatically.

The court said that the 32 INDIVIDUALS are not responsible.

Some low iq sickulars have tweeted that "babri apne aap gir gayi thi". You can burn but dont display your low iq please.

Someone just received a WhatsApp forward this morning stating the same, and decided to put it to good use....lol

 

[JNUite]

Nope. Hindus destroyed babri masjid and evidence is there, confessions more or less. These Hindus were acquitted and their record cleared. Some of them are now worthy enough to lead the secular republic. The secular republic selectively wipes the crimes of Hindus clean - hence it's not really a "secular republic".

What is the big deal if Hindus destroyed babri masjid?

Babri Masid was a decrepit place or khandhar(in urdu) where nobody had officered prayer for several decades before it was destroyed by Hindu fanatics.

It was only during in the Ram jananbhumi movement, most Muslims of India got to know about the existence of Babri masjid.

Also demolition of a place of worship isn't new even today's modern era.
In Pakistan most of the Hindu temples were demolished or converted to commercial places.

95% of worship places put to commercial use: Survey | The Express Tribune

They have been converted to shops, schools, govt offices.

tribune.com.pk

 

[JNUite]

Yes - There is no dispute that BABAR destroyed the mosque 500 years but there is no evidence that any of the 32 people chargesheeted in babri demolition case destroyed the mosque. Thats what your indian judicial system says. Jokers of the world.

First read few thing about the case before commenting.

These 32 people weren't charge sheeted in babri demolition case , they were were charge sheeted under criminal conspiracy in Babr demolition case.

Court didn't find substantial evidence to implicate them in conspiring to demolish the mosque as substantial evidence exist of the demolition being a spontaneous action hence they are acquitted.

 

[xeuss]

What is the big deal if Hindus destroyed babri masjid?

Babri Masid was a decrepit place or khandhar(in urdu) where nobody had officered prayer for several decades before it was destroyed by Hindu fanatics.

It was only during in the Ram jananbhumi movement, most Muslims of India got to know about the existence of Babri masjid.

Here comes again the cheerleader of the rabid Sanghis to justify their crimes.

Prayer was offered in Babri Masjid until Dec 22, 1949. The last prayers offered were the Isha prayers, led by Qazi Abdul Gaffar. That night, following the prayers, Hindus surreptitiously placed idols in the mosque and the next day the Government declared the masjid a disputed site and prevented Muslims from offering any more prayers in their own mosque.

Rest of the bloody history is well known.....

 

[Crixus]

How the Mosque came there initially?

Not sure about the relevance of Ayodhya in Islamic history ...

Here comes again the cheerleader of the rabid Sanghis to justify their crimes.

Prayer was offered in Babri Masjid until Dec 22, 1949. The last prayers offered were the Isha prayers, led by Qazi Abdul Gaffar. That night, following the prayers, Hindus surreptitiously placed idols in the mosque and the next day the Government declared the masjid a disputed site and prevented Muslims from offering any more prayers in their own mosque.

Rest of the bloody history is well known.....

 

[xeuss]

First read few thing about the case before commenting.

These 32 people weren't charge sheeted in babri demolition case , they were were charge sheeted under criminal conspiracy in Babr demolition case.

Court didn't find substantial evidence to implicate them in conspiring to demolish the mosque as substantial evidence exist of the demolition being a spontaneous action hence they are acquitted.

Let me rephrase this for you:

These 32 people who openly admitted their crime in the demolition of the Babri Masjid, were declared innocent by a kangaroo court that ignored all the evidence presented and confessions of the culprits. This is only the latest in the ongoing denial of rights and justice of the Muslims in India, as they are relegated to second class of citizens, much to the delight of the majority Hindus. The current conditions of Muslims in India evoke a grim reminder of the Jews in Nazi Germany, where a systematic effort to target the minority led was undertaken before the horrible Final Solution was enacted.

 

[xeuss]

How the Mosque came there initially?

Not sure about the relevance of Ayodhya in Islamic history ...

 

[Crixus]

Best if she was born during the time of those Uzbekistani thieves she might end up on sale in Baghdad ...... or been converted to Islam like weaker people India who get converted by either fear or by bribe, you know the concept of Jizya right

What your holy book says about Kafir women ???

It's so nice to see some victim card holder's a$$ on fire

View attachment 675587

 

[masterchief_mirza]

I never supported destruction of Babri masjid.

It is living evidence that should have been preserved with utmost care to educate generations of Hindus to come on the atrocities committed by the erst while Islamic rulers on their Hindu subjects.

My policy is always forgive but never forget.

Hopefully Hindus will not make the same mistake with Kashi and Mathura mosques built on destructed Hindu temples like they did with Babri Masjid.

Do you preserve a record of atrocities committed by Hindus on buddhists, other hindus and lower castes? Just curious. I've mentioned some of them previously, which you and your buddies pretend not to read.

Muslims came as punishment from God for the crimes Aryan invaders committed against subcontinent natives. If you follow the religion of the Aryan slave master, you get whatever you deserve from their replacements.

 

[Crixus]

with same logic Seems like now its God's signal for Muslims to pay for the crimes of their ancestors .

Do you preserve a record of atrocities committed by Hindus on buddhists, other hindus and lower castes? Just curious. I've mentioned some of them previously, which you and your buddies pretend not to read.

Muslims came as punishment from God for the crimes Aryan invaders committed against subcontinent natives. If you follow the religion of the Aryan slave master, you get whatever you deserve from their replacements.