What's new

India will suffer worse losses than 1962 if it incites border clash

I were merely saying that inferior complex Indian like to make-up fake histories to console their bruised ego, and that fact doesnt collide with the idea of making easy money from India````oh,mymy```you people, really live up to your IQ :lol:
China claims much of the territories all around the world basis their own version of "historical precedent" . Talk about fake histories :disagree:

As per the IQ part, you guys fail terribly to live up to your claimed IQ. :crazy:
 
. .
I were merely saying that inferior complex Indian like to make-up fake histories to console their bruised ego, and that fact doesnt collide with the idea of making easy money from India````oh,mymy```you people, really live up to your IQ :lol:
Thats how Chinese react when they have no counter argument... they throw a lot of words at you so that you struggle to find logic.. But I am not going to waste my time on this Chinese troll technique...

If Chinese generals have grown a pair of balls that India Chopped in 1967.. you guys are welcome to attack India.. and we will ensure another round of castration for your generals.
 
.
Machar as usual doing bzzz bzzz to boast off the fake ego .

Go fly around the *** of mother cow machar, you're only good at this
Raise your @ss up in the air and prey mulla ji, that you don't ever have to experience what all we are good at:partay:
 
.
China claims much of the territories all around the world basis their own version of "historical precedent" . Talk about fake histories :disagree:

As per the IQ part, you guys fail terribly to live up to your claimed IQ. :crazy:
Magic Vedic believer talking about historical evidence```:D, you lot really should bring your "pre-history A-bomb" to solve all the problems once and for all``
 
.
Magic Vedic believer talking about historical evidence```:D, you lot really should bring your "pre-history A-bomb" to solve all the problems once and for all``
The following is a list of China’s current claims against other countries, all of which it has made painfully clear it is willing to go to war over:

Afghanistan

Afghan province of Bahdashan (despite treaty of 1963, China still encroaches on Afghan territory).

Bhutan

Bhutanese enclaves in Tibet, namely Cherkip Gompa, Dho, Dungmar, Gesur, Gezon, Itse Gompa, Khochar, Nyanri, Ringung, Sanmar, Tarchen and Zuthulphuk. Also Kula Kangri and mountainous areas to the west of this peak, plus the western Haa District of Bhutan

Brunei

South China Sea especially Spratly Islands

Burma

China claims large areas of Burma on historical precedent (Yuan Dynasty, 1271-1368). There are unspecified border disputes with Burma.

Cambodia

China has, on occasion, claimed parts of Cambodia on historical precedent (Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644)

India

Aksai Chin (part of Jammu and Kashmir), Demchok, Chumar, Kaurik, Shipki Pass, Jadh, and Lapthal Shaksgam Valley, South Tibet (part of India-controlled Arunachal Pradesh), Trans-Karakoram Tract

Indonesia

Parts of the South China Sea.

Japan

Parts of the East China Sea, particularly the Senkaku Islands. Also, on occasion, the Ryukyu Islands, on the grounds that the completely independent Kingdom of Ryukyu was once a vassal state of China. The Kingdom of Ryukyu terminated tributary relations with China in 1874.

Kazakhstan

There are continual unilateral claims by China on Kazakhstan territory, despite new agreements, in China’s favour, signed every few years.

Kyrgyzstan

China claims the majority of Kyrgyzstan on the grounds that it was unfairly forced to cede the territory (which it had formerly conquered) to Russia in the 19th century.

Laos

China claims large areas of Laos on historical precedent (Yuan Dynasty, 1271-1368)

Malaysia

Parts of the South China Sea, particularly the Spratly Islands

Mongolia

China claims all of Mongolia on historical precedent (Yuan Dynasty, 1271-1368). In fact, Mongolia, under Genghis Khan, occupied China.

Nepal

China claims parts of Nepal dating back to the Sino-Nepalese War in 1788-1792. China claims they are part of Tibet, therefore part of China.

North Korea

Baekdu Mountain and Jiandao. China has also on occasion claimed all of North Korea on historical grounds (Yuan Dynasty, 1271-1368).

Pakistan

Territory is still unilaterally claimed by China, despite China signing numerous agreements.

Philippines

Parts of the South China Sea, particularly Scarborough Shoal and the Spratly Islands

Russia

160,000 square kilometres still unilaterally claimed by China, despite China signing numerous agreements.

Singapore

Parts of the South China Sea.

South Korea

Parts of the East China Sea. China has also on occasion claimed all of South Korea on historical grounds (Yuan Dynasty, 1271-1368).

Taiwan

China claims all of Taiwan, but particular disputes are: Macclesfield Bank, Paracel Islands, Scarborough Shoal, Senkaku Islands, parts of the South China Sea and the Spratly Islands.

Tajikistan

China claims parts of Tajikistan on historical precedent (Qing Dynasty, 1644-1912).

Vietnam

China claims large parts of Vietnam on historical precedent (Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644). Also: Macclesfield Bank, Paracel Islands, parts of the South China Sea and the Spratly Islands.

Additionally, China recently taunted Hillary Clinton about claiming territorial rights on Hawaii, and claimed that Chinese sailors had settled peacefully in Australia centuries before European discovery. And let’s not forget the supposed 1418 map that “proves” China discovered the Americas (and the entire world) long before Columbus.

https://chinadailymail.com/2013/12/...of-23-countries-but-only-has-borders-with-14/
 
.
I have not seen chinese behaving in this way before....... Can some chinese posters (Request our usual trolls not to respond) Why there is a difference this time? we have been having these exchanges on and off, and it was India in most of the cases used to make issues and statememnts...... But this time it is the other way around.....

I've not seen any of civilised nations acting as indians do .
Probably , China endured a lot and it was much for them to behave well with you but you being a be izat illogical lying country , you deserve to be confronted with strictness now so you don't dare to open your filthy mouth next time for more dirt .

The way your ministers and country has behaved with Pakistan since years and has killed our soldiers and called us bad names on international forums , if it was other nation they would've already banged you.
So yes , you don't understand the language of kindest and manners. You deserve to be confronted with strictness so that you get to know your asal oqaat.
 
.
Thats how Chinese react when they have no counter argument... they throw a lot of words at you so that you struggle to find logic.. But I am not going to waste my time on this Chinese troll technique...

If Chinese generals have grown a pair of balls that India Chopped in 1967.. you guys are welcome to attack India.. and we will ensure another round of castration for your generals.
yeah yeah 1967 BS again, you brainless lot $ucked it all up well, still stink of it :lol:````
 
. .
I've not seen any of civilised nations acting as indians do .
Probably , China endured a lot and it was much for them to behave well with you but you being a be izat illogical lying country , you deserve to be confronted with strictness now so you don't dare to open your filthy mouth next time for more dirt .

The way your ministers and country has behaved with Pakistan since years and has killed our soldiers and called us bad names on international forums , if it was other nation they would've already banged you.
So yes , you don't understand the language of kindest and manners. You deserve to be confronted with strictness so that you get to know your asal oqaat.
exactly````!
 
.
Raise your @ss up in the air and prey mulla ji, that you don't ever have to experience what all we are good at:partay:

Machar is only good at flying around the *** of holy mother cow and yes you all are really good at it . Bravo!
 
.
Go and prepare for attack on India my boy... don't waste time trying to scare Indian on Internet...
go to develop your IQ and logic kid, or you will always be the laughing stock of people who are living in a realy world``:P
 
.
I've not seen any of civilised nations acting as indians do .
Probably , China endured a lot and it was much for them to behave well with you but you being a be izat illogical lying country , you deserve to be confronted with strictness now so you don't dare to open your filthy mouth next time for more dirt .

The way your ministers and country has behaved with Pakistan since years and has killed our soldiers and called us bad names on international forums , if it was other nation they would've already banged you.
So yes , you don't understand the language of kindest and manners. You deserve to be confronted with strictness so that you get to know your asal oqaat.

My friend that question was to chinese, now that you have answered, i am not gonna waste my time reading your post.....
 
.
India will suffer worse losses than 1962 if it incites border clash
SAM Staff, July 5, 2017

global-times.gif

The face-off between Chinese and Indian troops in the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border seems to be escalating. The Indian military was quoted by Indian media as saying that more troops have been deployed there in a non-combative mode. Indian Defense Minister Arun Jaitley claimed that the India of 2017 is different from the India of 1962. Chief of Staff of the Indian Army, General Bipin Rawat, even said they are fully ready for a two-and-a-half front war – referring to China, Pakistan and internal security requirements.

Indian troops have trespassed over the China-Sikkim border, which is viewed as having already been demarcated, and is not a line of actual control. The Indian side has changed arguments several times, first claiming that “China intruded onto Indian territory,” but later saying “there was no incursion into our territory,” followed by the new excuse that India is helping Bhutan safeguard its territory. India is acting shamelessly before the international community.

New Delhi’s real purpose is to turn the Donglang area of China into a disputed region and block China’s road construction there. The Cold War-obsessed India is suspicious that China is building the road to cut off the Siliguri Corridor, an area held by Indians as strategically important for India to control its turbulent northeast area. India is taking the risk to betray the historical agreement and wants to force China to swallow the result.

Also Read: Like India, China also different from 1962: Beijing threatens New Delhi with war

India should look in the mirror. It was not able to refute the evidence of illegal border-trespassing and coerced its small neighbor Bhutan to shoulder the blame. India has long treated Bhutan as a vassal state, a rare scene under modern international relations. India’s illegal border intrusion is not allowed by international law; besides its suppression of Bhutan must be condemned by the international community. The Indian media claimed in recent days that New Delhi “shouldn’t abandon Bhutan.” India is humiliating the civilization of the 21st Century.

The Chinese public is infuriated by India’s provocation. We believe the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is powerful enough to expel Indian troops out of Chinese territory.

We firmly believe that the face-off in the Donglang area will end up with the Indian troops in retreat. The Indian military can choose to return to its territory with dignity, or be kicked out of the area by Chinese soldiers.

If New Delhi believes that its military might can be used as leverage in the Donglang area, and it’s ready for a two-and-a-half front war, we have to tell India that the Chinese look down on their military power. Jaitley is right that the India of 2017 is different from that of 1962 – India will suffer greater losses than in 1962 if it incites military conflicts.

China attaches great importance to domestic stability and doesn’t want to be mired in a mess with India. But New Delhi would be too naïve to think that Beijing would make concessions to its unruly demands.

Instead of taking immediate action, China still wants to address disputes by peaceful means, a practice that has been maintained for decades, and it is unwilling to face a pattern of confrontation in the border area. But a peaceful solution must lead to legitimate and justified outcomes. We hope India can face up to the hazards of its unruly actions to the country’s fundamental interests and withdraw its troops without delay.

We need to give diplomatic and military authorities full power to handle the issue. We call on Chinese society to maintain high-level unity on the issue. The more unified the Chinese people are, the more sufficient conditions the professionals will have to fight against India and safeguard our interests. This time, we must teach New Delhi a bitter lesson.

http://southasianmonitor.com/2017/07/05/india-will-suffer-worse-losses-1962-incites-border-clash/
PR China will be making a big mistake.

This will be their undoing.

Any major misadventure will force a major realignment in the global arena. India will be able to hold for about a month. The PR Chinese have never really fought en masse for a duration greater than a few months against non Chinese soldiers. They are very effective in Civil wars.

The geopolitical ramifications will be huge. The companies who have invested heavily in PR China and those who were planning to will be forced to think twice. If India is able to offer a better deal, they will setup shop in India, perhaps even draining their existing pool in PR China. Their economy may face see a major hit.

Either way India will win.

Only thing India will need to do is to make sure we don't lose the battles decisively.
 
.
Keyboard warriors certainly don't care, it is the life of front soldiers that is at risk.
PR China has been very loathe to start real full scale wars (other than Civil wars).

Hope better sense prevails and the forces withdraw from Bhutanese lands. :)
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom