What's new

India watching China's border infrastructure

Go to AP/Sikkim...PPL THERE ARE READY TO GIVE THEIR LIFE FOR THEIR MOTHERLAND INDIA......
GO TO KASHMIR, PPL and sons of Kashmir are giving their life to kill the hired mercanaries infiltrating from across the border.....

though this is offtopic here....here by aggression means CHina attacking India or vice versa....

Dont wanna argue this with you, you know the life condition of them. And what you did in kashmir is world well known.

Dont go for th numbers..go for the quality...;)
Oh, I cant compare ourself with a army crashed 300 jets in 20 years. About navy, you can compare the quality of destroyers, frigates and submarines.;) BTW: We made all those stuff by ourself, not buying.

when u say no it wont be the case, it is kind of not useful to make the point...u r just living in dream that India will hold back and be lenient towards China.....:pop:
Who said I think indian will hold back or do what esle? Whatever you do the result will not be good for you.
 
.
Oh, dont forget that you aggressed ashmir, Sikkim and south tibet.
Indian are very aggressive.

FISRSTLY I WILL DEAL WITH SIKKIM
In 1947, a popular vote rejected Sikkim's joining the Indian Union, and Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru agreed to a special protectorate status for Sikkim. Sikkim came under the suzerainty of India, which controlled its external affairs, defence, diplomacy and communications, but Sikkim otherwise retained autonomy. A state council was established in 1955 to allow for constitutional government under the Chogyal. Meanwhile, the Sikkim National Congress demanded fresh elections and greater representation for the Nepalese. In 1973, riots in front of the palace led to a formal request for protection from India. The Chogyal was proving to be extremely unpopular with the people. In 1975, the Kazi (Prime Minister) appealed to the Indian Parliament for a change in Sikkim's status so that it could become a state of India. In April, the Indian Army took over the city of Gangtok and disarmed the Palace Guards. A referendum was held in which 97.5% of the voting people (59% of the people entitled to vote) voted to join the Indian Union. A few weeks later, on 16 May 1975, Sikkim officially became the 22nd state of the Indian Union and the monarchy was abolished.[16]

n 2000, the seventeenth Karmapa Urgyen Trinley Dorje, who had been proclaimed a tulku by the atheist Chinese Communist party, escaped from Tibet to the Rumtek Monastery in Sikkim. Chinese officials were in a quandary on this issue, as any protests to India would mean an explicit endorsement of India's governance of Sikkim, which the Chinese still regarded as an independent state occupied by India. China eventually recognized Sikkim as an Indian state in 2003, on the condition that India accepted Tibet Autonomous Region as a part of China.[17] This mutual agreement led to a thaw in Sino-Indian relations.[18] New Delhi accepted Tibet as a part of China in 1953 during the government of then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru.[19] On 6 July 2006, the Himalayan pass of Nathula was opened to cross-border trade, further evidence of improving relations in the region.[20]

NOW KASHMIR
Ranbir Singh's grandson Hari Singh, who had ascended the throne of Kashmir in 1925, was the reigning monarch in 1947 at the conclusion of British rule of the subcontinent and the subsequent partition of the British Indian Empire into the newly independent Union of India and the Dominion of Pakistan. As parties to the partition process, both countries had agreed that the rulers of princely states would be given the right to opt for either Pakistan or India or—in special cases—to remain independent. Kashmir's population was overall 77 per cent Muslim but with internal areas of non-Muslim majority. It shared a boundary with both India and Pakistan. Pakistan anticipated that the Maharaja would accede to Pakistan, when the British paramountcy ended on 14–15 August. When he hesitated to do this, Pakistan launched a guerilla infiteration meant to frighten its ruler into submission. Instead the Maharaja appealed to Mountbatten[26] for assistance, and the Governor-General agreed on the condition that the ruler accede to India."[27] Once the Maharaja signed the Instrument of Accession, "Indian soldiers entered Kashmir and drove the Pakistani-sponsored irregulars from all but a small section of the state. The United Nations was then invited to mediate the quarrel. The UN mission insisted that the opinion of Kashmiris must be ascertained, while India insisted that no referendum could occur until all of the state had been cleared of irregulars."[27]

now AP(South Tibet)

In 1913-1914 representatives of China, Tibet and Britain negotiated a treaty in India: the Simla Accord.[4] This treaty's objective was to define the borders between Inner and Outer Tibet as well as between Outer Tibet and British India. British administrator, Sir Henry McMahon, drew up the 550 miles (890 km) McMahon Line as the border between British India and Outer Tibet during the Simla Conference. The Tibetan and British representatives at the conference agreed to the line, which ceded Tawang and other Tibetan areas to the British Empire. The Chinese representative had no problems with the border between British India and Outer Tibet, however on the issue of the border between Outer Tibet and Inner Tibet the talks broke down. Thus, the Chinese representative refused to accept the agreement and walked out.[citation needed] The Tibetan Government and British Government went ahead with the Simla Agreement and declared that the benefits of other articles of this treaty would not be bestowed on China as long as it stays out of the purview. The Chinese position since then has been that since China had sovereignty over Tibet, the line was invalid without Chinese agreement. Furthermore, by refusing to sign the Simla documents, the Chinese Government had escaped according any recognition to the validity of the McMahon Line


..China atuallt agressed ad captured TIBET abd captured Ladakh an Inda buddhist terriroty from pakistan(as a gift)!
 
Last edited:
.
Enough inflammatory rhetoric!

Let’s go back to the rational logic/business fundamentals and set aside ideology (such as authoritarian vs multi-party type of rubbish. Yes, in front of national interest, I consider them all damn rubbish.)

Indians should have a profound understanding that making China your enemy number one is the biggest mistake of your foreign policy since your independence. It only bogs YOU down not China. It makes you feel less confident, more constrained, more suspicious of each other among yourselves, more unconfident with your other neighbors…

China cares much less whether India is hostile or friendly, as God/Nature has made such geography that is in great favor of China. In addition, China is one of big 5 due to its endeavour in WWII.

Had India not made China its number one enemy, India could have been more advanced than China. Just by looking at how big mistake the CPC had made in such foolish things as Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution.

India could have been the beacon of every thing in Asia: its rich culture, its diverse ideologies, its technologies. You could have higher literacy. You could have a healthier people. You could have been a star in world sport arena. You could have been the model for the Chinese to admire instead of their laughing stock…

But you and your politicians said, resolutely, no to all this with such incredible temerity.

In the last 30+ years, your gap vs China has been becoming larger and larger year by year. Why? Because you suffer more constraints made by you than the Chinese do!

Who cares if a country can advance and people are happy and prosperous but the name is democracy or dictatorship.

The Chinese would happily let you have the biggest democracy in name with the poorest people, and they bear the name of authoritarian but enjoy the freedom, happiness and prosperity many times more than you do.

When the dust settles down, they add a touch of glory to authoritarianship, you put a line of shame to democracy.
 
.
.
Strongly suspect whether your big mouth is connected with your brain or actually with a peanut.

Can you explain this if "India sells,world buys"? Please don't be in a clownish way.

put some pressure on ur mind....nd understand the meaning of the post i made....
though i doubt u can understand....:wave:
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom