What's new

India vs. China: The Battle for Global Manufacturing

With its chronic blackouts, crumbling roads, and other infrastructure woes, India should have no appeal for John Ginascol. A vice president at Abbott Laboratories , Ginascol is responsible for ensuring that the company’s food-products factories run smoothly worldwide. He can’t afford surprises when it comes to electricity, water, and other essentials. “People like me,” he says, “dream of having existing, good, reliable infrastructure.”

Yet Abbott has just opened its first plant in India, and Ginascol says there haven’t been any nightmares so far. In October the company began production at a $75 million factory in an industrial park in the western state of Gujarat. The factory is producing Similac baby formula and nutritional supplement PediaSure, which Abbott plans to sell to the growing Indian middle class. The plant will employ about 400 workers by the time it’s fully up and running next year. As for India’s infrastructure, Ginascol has no complaints. The officials in charge of the park “were able to deliver very good, very reliable power, water, natural gas, and roads,” he says. “Fundamentally, the infrastructure was in place.”

View attachment 147599

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is hoping other executives will be similarly impressed with the ease of manufacturing in his country. Before Modi took charge in New Delhi, he headed the state government in Gujarat, and during his 13 years in power there he made the state an industrial leader. Manufacturing accounts for 28 percent of Gujarat’s economy, compared with 13 percent for the country as a whole, and a touch less than the 30 percent figure for manufacturing titan China.

In an attempt to build India’s industrial base nationwide, Modi is pushing the Make in India campaign, designed to attract foreign investment by highlighting the ongoing changes. “We have to increase manufacturing and ensure that the benefits reach the youth of our nation,” Modi tweeted after the initiative’s Sept. 25 introduction. By now he’s eased restrictions on foreign investment in property projects and begun an overhaul of the railroad system.

In the year ahead the prime minister’s campaign may gain momentum, thanks to the shifting fortunes of India and its neighbor China. The Indian economy, which slumped badly in 2012 and 2013, will likely grow 6.3 percent next year, in part because of investor confidence in Modi. By 2016 the country’s growth rate of 7.2 percent will surpass China’s 7.1 percent, says CLSA senior economist Rajeev Malik.

Well before the arrival of Modi, Indian leaders had talked about promoting manufacturing. The slowdown in China, however, could make a big difference this time. China became an export powerhouse because of its vast pool of low-wage workers, but it’s no longer so cheap to manufacture there. Pinched by double-digit increases in China’s minimum wages, many companies are looking for low-cost alternatives. Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam and Indonesia are attractive, but they lack the deep supply of workers available in India. “It’s the only country that has the scale to take up where China is leaving off,” says Frederic Neumann, a senior economist with HSBC. Vietnam and Indonesia? “Neither one is big enough to take up the slack,” he says, leaving India with a “golden opportunity.”

The hourly labor cost in India for manufacturing averages 92¢, compared with $3.52 in China, according to Boston Consulting Group. But, says Anil Gupta, a professor at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business, India hasn’t come close to matching China’s investments in the roads, ports, and power networks that companies want. “Lousy infrastructure essentially eats up any advantage the country may have on the labor front.”

View attachment 147600

Local leaders allied with Modi are trying to change that. In Madhya Pradesh the state government is creating 27 industrial areas while promising to improve infrastructure and make labor laws and land acquisition regulations more investor-friendly. Passing new labor laws that make it easier to hire and fire is especially important.

On the diplomatic front, Modi has adroitly taken advantage of the rivalry between Japan and China: After recent meetings with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Chinese President Xi Jinping, he won commitments for almost $57 billion in investments in India. China pledged $20 billion, and Japan about 4 trillion yen ($35.5 billion). Much of the money will be used to build a giant industrial corridor between Delhi and Mumbai featuring high-speed trains and superhighways. The goal, University of Maryland’s Gupta says, is to turn the area into the equivalent of southern China’s Guangdong province, which built special economic zones to transform China into an exporting power. India’s leaders “have the political ducks lined up” to make that happen, he says.

View attachment 147601

That’s getting some executives excited about the possibilities. “India has the land, India has the people, India has everything,” says Ajit Gulabchand, chairman of Hindustan Construction. “Why wouldn’t global manufacturers come?”

Among those making commitments is Ford Motor, which has one factory in the southern state of Tamil Nadu and is opening a second $1 billion plant in Gujarat in 2015. Japanese auto parts maker Nidec in June announced a plan to invest 10 billion yen in a motor manufacturing plant in the northern state of Rajasthan. At the end of November, Yamaha Motor is scheduled to open a $244 million factory producing motor scooters near Chennai in Tamil Nadu, an investment that’s attracted shock absorber maker KYB and other Japanese suppliers.Panasonic on Oct. 1 announced it had formed a venture with Minda Industries, a Delhi-based maker of auto parts; their plant is scheduled to produce 2 million car batteries a year starting in 2018.

“A lot of projects which were stuck now have been cleared,” says Baba Kalyani, chairman of Bharat Forge, one of India’s biggest makers of auto parts. Pro-reform state governments such as those in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat, both controlled by Modi’s party, “will be able to attract maximum investment,” Kalyani says.

There are still plenty of reasons for companies to be wary about India. China is now the No. 1 manufacturing location for Hong Kong-based TAL Group, one of the world’s largest producers of dress shirts for men. Because China is becoming too expensive, Chief Executive Officer Roger Lee says the company is expanding in Vietnam. A few years ago, TAL considered moving to India but ultimately ruled it out. “Each factory could have many, many different labor unions,” he recalls. “When you have many, many different unions, then it gets pretty hard to manage.” To address worries about labor regulations, Modi announced reforms on Oct. 16 that allow an employer to file a single report on compliance with 16 different labor-related laws. Such streamlining “will provide enormous relief and reduce the compliance burden” according to the Confederation of Indian Industry.

Micromax is the top local smartphone brand in India, second in market share only toSamsung. The company takes advantage of its Indian roots to win customers, but when it comes to putting its phones together, it looks to factories in China. To produce locally, a company such as Micromax would need to have lots of its suppliers nearby; that exists in China, not in India. “You need to have cameras, screens, touch panels, chip sets. You need all that to be around you,” says Chairman Sanjay Kapoor. “If you are able to build that ecosystem, then the whole Make in India story comes true.”
--
why china is global manufacturing hub
can any chinese member or TT or any one can reply
  • how much power cost /unit to industry
  • how much interlinkage of raod , railways to port and manfucting hub
  • how tax policy benefit manufacturing
  • Role of govt with respect to labor , environment,
  • how much minimum wages are there in china
  • which are top performing sector and region and why
  • is SEZ is making things work
  • Who are top most manufacturer

--
thanks..
searching for this guy
he was and is bang on his analysis..

Global_manufacturing_LARGE.jpg

How manufacturing can create value and jobs - OECD Observer

The key lesson for policy is to encourage the accumulation of knowledge-based capital at home, and to be able to capture as much value from the investment as possible. Through ensuring good business frameworks, such as those affecting the supply of skills and the operation of intellectual property rights, governments can help encourage firms to invest in certain high value functions, such as R&D, prototyping, design, etc, and while some low-skilled jobs will inevitably stay, most growth in low paid jobs will take place elsewhere
----
The Shifting Economics of Global Manufacturing
upload_2014-11-7_19-30-54.png
upload_2014-11-7_19-30-54.png


upload_2014-11-7_19-31-53.png



upload_2014-11-7_19-32-21.png


upload_2014-11-7_19-32-54.png
 
Last edited:
.
upload_2014-11-7_19-33-56.png


2010 Report: Global manufacturing labor rates, trends and competitiveness

China had highest rate of labor force participation for persons ages 25 to 54. U.S. remains leading producer of manufactured goods. Largest labor force was combined EU-15 countries. Sweden had highest social insurance costs as a percent of manufacturing hourly compensation. Republic of Korea had largest increase in manufacturing labor productivity. Spain, Portugal only European countries with lower hourly manufacturing compensation costs than U.S.

Trends in the global manufacturing labor force, hourly manufacturing compensation costs, manufacturing labor productivity and unit labor costs are all useful for partially assessing international competitiveness for companies with manufacturing and labor at the core of their product or services. (See, also: Report: China manufacturing hourly labor rate, compensation costs impact EMS)

Information presented in this article represents related manufacturing and labor data VentureOutsource.com believes is of interest to our decision-making users.

The data that follows is part of a report released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic (www.bls.gov) and is based mainly upon the output of the BLS program of international comparisons of labor force, compensation, prices, and productivity.

To increase country and indicator coverage, BLS data are supplemented by data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (www.oecd.org) and other organizations. Due to the nature of data presented and the amount of time required to ensure data is as accurate as possible, readers will note the amount of time data timeframes precede the April 2010 release date of this report. Visit the BLS website for report methodology and additional information.

Size of the labor force, 2008 [Fig.1]
The labor force is comprised of all employed and unemployed persons, that is, all members of the working-age population who are either (1) working for pay, profit, or family gain, or (2) available for and actively seeking work. The labor force represents the supply of labor in an economy. The size of the labor force is affected by the size of the country’s population.

The EU-15 countries combined had the largest labor force, followed by the United States.

Fig. 1

Global-Labor-Force-08.gif

Hourly compensation costs, 2007 [Fig. 2]
Hourly compensation costs measure the cost to employers to hire one hour of labor in manufacturing. They include payments made directly to workers, as well as employer expenditures on social insurance.

In some countries, taxes and subsidies related to employment also are included. For this measure, hourly compensation costs in national currencies have been converted to U.S. dollars using market exchange rates.

Manufacturing hourly compensation costs were highest in Norway, at 1.8 times the U.S. level. Australia, Canada, and 10 of the 12 European countries had higher hourly compensation costs than the United States. Spain and Portugal were the only two European countries that had lower hourly compensation costs than the United States. Hourly compensation costs were under $11 in Mexico, Taiwan, and Portugal.

Fig. 2

Hourly-Rates-Costs-07.gif

Average annual growth rates for hourly compensation costs, 1997 to 2007
(All employees in manufacturing)
[Fig. 3]
Hourly compensation costs can be measured in the national currency of each country or converted to U.S. dollars using exchange rates. When national currencies are converted to U.S. dollars, growth in hourly compensation is magnified if the foreign currency appreciated against the dollar, or lessened if the foreign currency depreciated. The differences between the two growth rates represent the effects of changes in exchange rates.

During this period (1997 to 2007), the national currency of every country, except Mexico, Singapore, and Taiwan, appreciated against the U.S. dollar; therefore, growth in manufacturing hourly compensation costs was greater in U.S. dollars than in national currencies for all but these three countries. Growth in U.S. hourly compensation costs was relatively low.

Fig. 3

Hourly-Costs-Growth-97-07.gif

Employer social insurance expenditures and other labor taxes as a percent of hourly compensation costs, 2007 (All employees in manufacturing) [Fig. 4]
Social insurance expenditures refer to the value of contributions made by employers to secure employee entitlement to benefits such as, for example, retirement and disability pensions, health insurance, occupational injury and illness compensation, unemployment insurance, or life insurance; these contributions often provide delayed future income and benefits to employees. Other labor taxes refer to taxes on payrolls or employment (or reductions to reflect subsidies).

Social insurance costs as a percent of manufacturing hourly compensation costs ranged widely, from 12.3% (Denmark) to 33.1% (Sweden) in European countries, and from 4.6% (New Zealand) to 26.3% (Mexico) in non-European countries.

Fig. 4

Taxes-Percent-Hourly-07.gif

Average annual growth rates for manufacturing productivity, output, and hours worked, 1998 to 2008 [Fig. 5]
Manufacturing labor productivity is a measure of economic efficiency that shows how effectively hours worked are converted into output. When output growth is larger than growth in hours worked, productivity increases; conversely, when growth in hours worked is larger than output growth, productivity decreases. Advances in productivity can increase national income.

In all countries, manufacturing output growth was larger than growth in hours worked, indicating increasing productivity; specifically, as output increased, hours worked decreased in all but four countries. The Republic of Korea had the largest increase in manufacturing labor productivity, followed by Sweden, Taiwan, and the United States; growth was lowest in Italy.

Fig. 5

Manufacturing-Growth-Rates.gif

Average annual growth rates for manufacturing unit labor costs in U.S. dollars, 1998 to 2008 [Fig. 6]
Unit labor costs are calculated by dividing hourly compensation (compensation per hour) by productivity (output per hour). This indicator, therefore, measures the cost of labor compensation expended to produce one unit of output. Unit labor costs have a large impact on an economy’s international cost competitiveness; declines in unit labor costs indicate that an economy is becoming more cost competitive.

Manufacturing unit labor costs declined only in Taiwan, Japan, Singapore, and the United States. Australia had the largest increase in unit labor costs.

Fig. 6

Manufacturing-unit-labor-08.gif
 

Attachments

  • upload_2014-11-7_19-35-35.png
    upload_2014-11-7_19-35-35.png
    37.9 KB · Views: 27
.
india go back to compare with africa, where is your rightful place. One day when you supass them in reality rather than forcast, let us know.
tell me one African , Asian countries superior to India . Am sure u will find tha we are actually too close to become par with advanced nation. Our rightful place . We are global power not a midget nation with no future. Wait till next year INDIAN TIGER WILL BE BESO CLOSES NECK AND NECK WITH DEVELOPMENT NATION . UNLIKE CHINESE GROWTH STORY . WHICH IS BUBBLE WAITING TO BURST .
 
. . .
With its chronic blackouts, crumbling roads, and other infrastructure woes, India should have no appeal for John Ginascol. A vice president at Abbott Laboratories , Ginascol is responsible for ensuring that the company’s food-products factories run smoothly worldwide. He can’t afford surprises when it comes to electricity, water, and other essentials. “People like me,” he says, “dream of having existing, good, reliable infrastructure.”

Yet Abbott has just opened its first plant in India, and Ginascol says there haven’t been any nightmares so far. In October the company began production at a $75 million factory in an industrial park in the western state of Gujarat. The factory is producing Similac baby formula and nutritional supplement PediaSure, which Abbott plans to sell to the growing Indian middle class. The plant will employ about 400 workers by the time it’s fully up and running next year. As for India’s infrastructure, Ginascol has no complaints. The officials in charge of the park “were able to deliver very good, very reliable power, water, natural gas, and roads,” he says. “Fundamentally, the infrastructure was in place.”

View attachment 147599

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is hoping other executives will be similarly impressed with the ease of manufacturing in his country. Before Modi took charge in New Delhi, he headed the state government in Gujarat, and during his 13 years in power there he made the state an industrial leader. Manufacturing accounts for 28 percent of Gujarat’s economy, compared with 13 percent for the country as a whole, and a touch less than the 30 percent figure for manufacturing titan China.

In an attempt to build India’s industrial base nationwide, Modi is pushing the Make in India campaign, designed to attract foreign investment by highlighting the ongoing changes. “We have to increase manufacturing and ensure that the benefits reach the youth of our nation,” Modi tweeted after the initiative’s Sept. 25 introduction. By now he’s eased restrictions on foreign investment in property projects and begun an overhaul of the railroad system.

In the year ahead the prime minister’s campaign may gain momentum, thanks to the shifting fortunes of India and its neighbor China. The Indian economy, which slumped badly in 2012 and 2013, will likely grow 6.3 percent next year, in part because of investor confidence in Modi. By 2016 the country’s growth rate of 7.2 percent will surpass China’s 7.1 percent, says CLSA senior economist Rajeev Malik.

Well before the arrival of Modi, Indian leaders had talked about promoting manufacturing. The slowdown in China, however, could make a big difference this time. China became an export powerhouse because of its vast pool of low-wage workers, but it’s no longer so cheap to manufacture there. Pinched by double-digit increases in China’s minimum wages, many companies are looking for low-cost alternatives. Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam and Indonesia are attractive, but they lack the deep supply of workers available in India. “It’s the only country that has the scale to take up where China is leaving off,” says Frederic Neumann, a senior economist with HSBC. Vietnam and Indonesia? “Neither one is big enough to take up the slack,” he says, leaving India with a “golden opportunity.”

The hourly labor cost in India for manufacturing averages 92¢, compared with $3.52 in China, according to Boston Consulting Group. But, says Anil Gupta, a professor at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business, India hasn’t come close to matching China’s investments in the roads, ports, and power networks that companies want. “Lousy infrastructure essentially eats up any advantage the country may have on the labor front.”

View attachment 147600

Local leaders allied with Modi are trying to change that. In Madhya Pradesh the state government is creating 27 industrial areas while promising to improve infrastructure and make labor laws and land acquisition regulations more investor-friendly. Passing new labor laws that make it easier to hire and fire is especially important.

On the diplomatic front, Modi has adroitly taken advantage of the rivalry between Japan and China: After recent meetings with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Chinese President Xi Jinping, he won commitments for almost $57 billion in investments in India. China pledged $20 billion, and Japan about 4 trillion yen ($35.5 billion). Much of the money will be used to build a giant industrial corridor between Delhi and Mumbai featuring high-speed trains and superhighways. The goal, University of Maryland’s Gupta says, is to turn the area into the equivalent of southern China’s Guangdong province, which built special economic zones to transform China into an exporting power. India’s leaders “have the political ducks lined up” to make that happen, he says.

View attachment 147601

That’s getting some executives excited about the possibilities. “India has the land, India has the people, India has everything,” says Ajit Gulabchand, chairman of Hindustan Construction. “Why wouldn’t global manufacturers come?”

Among those making commitments is Ford Motor, which has one factory in the southern state of Tamil Nadu and is opening a second $1 billion plant in Gujarat in 2015. Japanese auto parts maker Nidec in June announced a plan to invest 10 billion yen in a motor manufacturing plant in the northern state of Rajasthan. At the end of November, Yamaha Motor is scheduled to open a $244 million factory producing motor scooters near Chennai in Tamil Nadu, an investment that’s attracted shock absorber maker KYB and other Japanese suppliers.Panasonic on Oct. 1 announced it had formed a venture with Minda Industries, a Delhi-based maker of auto parts; their plant is scheduled to produce 2 million car batteries a year starting in 2018.

“A lot of projects which were stuck now have been cleared,” says Baba Kalyani, chairman of Bharat Forge, one of India’s biggest makers of auto parts. Pro-reform state governments such as those in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat, both controlled by Modi’s party, “will be able to attract maximum investment,” Kalyani says.

There are still plenty of reasons for companies to be wary about India. China is now the No. 1 manufacturing location for Hong Kong-based TAL Group, one of the world’s largest producers of dress shirts for men. Because China is becoming too expensive, Chief Executive Officer Roger Lee says the company is expanding in Vietnam. A few years ago, TAL considered moving to India but ultimately ruled it out. “Each factory could have many, many different labor unions,” he recalls. “When you have many, many different unions, then it gets pretty hard to manage.” To address worries about labor regulations, Modi announced reforms on Oct. 16 that allow an employer to file a single report on compliance with 16 different labor-related laws. Such streamlining “will provide enormous relief and reduce the compliance burden” according to the Confederation of Indian Industry.

Micromax is the top local smartphone brand in India, second in market share only toSamsung. The company takes advantage of its Indian roots to win customers, but when it comes to putting its phones together, it looks to factories in China. To produce locally, a company such as Micromax would need to have lots of its suppliers nearby; that exists in China, not in India. “You need to have cameras, screens, touch panels, chip sets. You need all that to be around you,” says Chairman Sanjay Kapoor. “If you are able to build that ecosystem, then the whole Make in India story comes true.”

India need to focus on these things to increase competitiveness for manufacturing boom:-
1. Red Tapeism
2. Power sector
3. Infrastructure and transportation.
 
.
India need to focus on these things to increase competitiveness for manufacturing boom:-
1. Red Tapeism
2. Power sector
3. Infrastructure and transportation.
About power sector,i can assure you industrial parks have sufficient electricity and moreover there have been coal reforms and many other reforms to boost business.
 
. .
.
Mate, Must not listen to other members what they say, we will definitely achieve it. It is clear from our eastern neighbor members comment, the insecurity they feel!! Please keep posting and let them pissed off.

It is hilarious to see a "pigcaretaker" commenting!!
We are the youngest nation in world, we have enough power supplies,we have numbers,good laws and foreign investment is enhancing infrastructure.No doubt India is poised to be a global power.
 
. .
"make in India" can really skyrocket us to unbelievable heights

no comparisons with China of course, they're the leaders.. fukin' everything is made in China.. my computer, all parts including this keyboard, my tv, phone, sound card, music system.. all Chinese :sick:

surely we can steal some of that market from them, make make in India a reality !
 
.
People like you are good for trolling, its clear from your response that you didn't even read the content and you don't know the aim of post.Even a kid knows China is a manufacturing giant,you didn't enlighten us by telling that China is far ahead in manufacturing.
Poor comments from you, i told the truth which you compared with useless trollling is your problem.
 
.
Poor comments from you, i told the truth which you compared with useless trollling is your problem.

He wasn't trolling. I want to know, can Chinese keep this low cost manufacturing edge till eternity seeing the way the salaries are skyrocketing in China. ;)
 
.
Nope they can't but the edge of infrastructure that it has created mainly Roads, Rail and construction of hydro-electric projects makes manufacturing cost much lower in compare to india so comparing only one factor of input that is labor ignoring other factors does not make India more competitive against China.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom