India: UNSC already mentioned JeM-Pulwama link in February itself

[Tejas Spokesman]

Of course it would have

If they didnt mention Pulwama or Kashmir and states his reason for listing was affiliation to AQ years ago then that is a slap in the face of india that modi is trying to present as a lollipop

They stated his ban was for affiliation to JeM which itself was banned in 2002 for affiliation to AQ.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1123752251833626625

As already stated ban listing is not bio data

 

[Areesh]

As already stated ban listing is not bio data

Fact: It doesn't mention Pulwama

All rest is meaningless rhetoric by bharatis

 

[hussain0216]

And didn't mention Pulwama in April

result: India and UN backtracked

Yep China basically asked what EVIDENCE does india or anyone have linking Azhar to Pulwama or Kashmir

(India had nothing but its tears and tiny balls)

Ergo China refused to allow the listing

After alot of more indian tears

The indians back tracked

ALL MENTION OF PULWAMA AND KASHMIR was removed
And they placed a dying old man sitting in a hospital on a list that means balls

 

[Areesh]

Yep China basically asked what EVIDENCE does india or anyone have linking Azhar to Pulwama or Kashmir

(India had nothing but its tears and tiny balls)

Ergo China refused to allow the listing

After alot of more indian tears

The indians back tracked

ALL MENTION OF PULWAMA AND KASHMIR was removed
And they placed a dying old man sitting in a hospital on a list that means balls

Exactly

Pakistan and China made Modi's India backtrack from its original position

 

[SIPRA]

Two things must be understood very clearly:

1) Global politics is governed neither by some kind of moral values nor by certain sense of justice and fair play. It is straightway ruled by the principle of "Might is Right". The influence, a state wields, is directly proportional to its economic, technological and military resources.
2) UN is not at all some kind of body to provide justice to its member states; but to preserve, in an orderly manner, the respective interests of states, not on the basis of equality, but again somewhat proportional to their aggregate power. To exemplify, UN is a well attired concubine, which distributes its favors and entertains, in accordance with the respective influence, power and wealth of the "Tamaashbeens" or members.

If Pakistan wants UN to not to act against its national interests; it will have to gain and acquire wealth and power. There is no shortcut to it; rest is merely "Randi Rona".

"Lissay da ke zor Mohammad, nas jaana ya rona"
(Mian Mohammad Bakhash in Saif ul Maluk)

Case of Maulana Masood Azher need to be seen in the above perspective. Discussing it in certain moral framework is utterly futile and useless.

 

[Nefarious]

Another one of those "Abhi shot down the SD 10 with his Mig 21" type threads lol

 

[Goenitz]

any Masood Azhar page/brochure stating that he did the attack... or any press release?
i bet they soem monthly magazine..

 

[Cobra Arbok]

Apparently they must not teach using Google in Madrassahs, because it is easy to find that the UNSC did indeed pass a resolution condemning Pulwama days after the attack. Not only did it condemn the terrorist attack, it also called on UN members to support India in its war on terrorism in Kashmir. This means the UNSC now supports India on Kashmir. Meaning that Diplomatically and in terms of Global perception, India has won. Pakistan has been isolated and humiliated in front of the whole world yet again, and Pakistanis are trying to portray that as a victory lol.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...names-jaish/story-ZaP0eSj2q7YWrW3yBFhh6J.html