India to propose railway link between Kabul and Chittagong

[Icewolf]

Hey who told you Pak's per capita income is more than India.

Well literally, he is very right

Per capita in layman term is just GDP divided by population

Not a good measurement in India where 70% of Indians live below $2

 

[INDIC]

So if I understand well your point is: you want Gilgit-Baltistan, automatically you can have access to afghanistan and central Asia while create a separation wall between China and Pakistan, that will not only weakening our relation at the same time block our way to Arabian sea...one stone three birds ...genius

We don't want third party interfere in Kashmir.

Well literally, he is very right

Per capita in layman term is just GDP divided by population

Not a good measurement in India where 70% of Indians live below $2

What about Pakistan, no census since 1998.

 

[sarthak]

okay lets both of us hold a plebiscite in both parts of kashmir...after removing our armies in presence of international observers...giving kashmiries three option..1)be independent 2) join PAk 3) join Ind n then follow whateva is the outcome

No , that is not a fair solution. Millions of Pakistanis from other provinces now reside in the Pakistani side of Kashmir. Meanwhile , the Indian side of Kashmir has been relatively free from outside influx. Plebiscite was a good solution 50 years ago , not anymore. Plus , the solution has room for a lot of cheating. You can deploy as many UN personnel as you want , but both the Indian government and Pakistani government can easily create fake votes.

 

[Icewolf]

What about Pakistan, no census since 1998.

Topic on hand is railway link between Kabul & Chittagong.

Grow up, stop trolling, and stop posting off topic stuff.

 

[Jade]

@ giga waaat? PAK per captia income is still better than india and poverty levels are lot less than india.....Come in real world n correct yr facts and stop sucking i have had lots of fun ...or yu wanna continue sucking??? its upto you



you are wise but india's main potential will be tapped once she gets connected to CAR's and afghanistan and iran which cant be done unless yu give us muslim majority kashmir....

China would never like to see its foe getting along well so will always press you down one way or the other...never gonna happen

In fact you are wrong. According to IMF, India's per capita is USD 3900 while Pakistan's is USD 2800.

And regarding Kashmir, it is no more a Muslim/Hindu problem. It has become deeper than that. Lot of blood has flown in last 70 years. Kashmir would have been easily settled in 1940 or 50's, not anymore.

As regarding China, China means business and nothing else. China will jump if India wants to connect to China, but it is India that is restraint. There is a proposal from China on free trade agreement with India. It is India that is not yet ready for such an agreement.

 

[Icewolf]

@Jade

Per capita doesnt matter in India

Per capita is just GDP divided by population

Not a good measure in India where 70% of the population earns below $2

 

[INDIC]

Topic on hand is railway link between Kabul & Chittagong.

Grow up, stop trolling, and stop posting off topic stuff.

Ok tell me about Lahore to Kabul's part.

 

[Jade]

@Jade

Per capita doesnt matter in India

Per capita is just GDP divided by population

Not a good measure in India where 70% of the population earns below $2

Per capita is a very important measure of measuring prosperity of a country. IMF and World bank and lot other international agencies use it extensively in their policy making.

 

[Icewolf]

Per capita is a very important measure of measuring prosperity of a country. IMF and World bank and lot other international agencies use it extensively in their policy making.

Not really.

A national census is better than per capita.

Also, IMF & World Bank use per capita & GDP to see prosperity of the government & economy. When GDP goes up, per capita goes up, and loans also go up.

In the instance of comparison, per capita is not accurate way of judging a countries situation.

Just because Bob's circle of 4 friends have a combined wealth of $400, doesn't mean they each have $100 in their pocket.

 

[Jade]

Not really.

A national census is better than per capita.

Also, IMF & World Bank use per capita & GDP to see prosperity of the government & economy. When GDP goes up, per capita goes up, and loans also go up.

In the instance of comparison, per capita is not accurate way of judging a countries situation.

Just because Bob's circle of 4 friends have a combined wealth of $400, doesn't mean they each have $100 in their pocket.

Yes you are right, but the inaccuracies of GDP per capita is applicable uniformly to all countries. Hence taken as a measure of prosperity.

Just because US per capita is USD 40000, does n't mean every one earns USD 40000 uniformly. Scores of people in US too are homeless

 

[INDIC]

Not really.

A national census is better than per capita.

Also, IMF & World Bank use per capita & GDP to see prosperity of the government & economy. When GDP goes up, per capita goes up, and loans also go up.

In the instance of comparison, per capita is not accurate way of judging a countries situation.

Just because Bob's circle of 4 friends have a combined wealth of $400, doesn't mean they each have $100 in their pocket.

Ok but why Pakistan failed to complete Lowari tunnel in 40 years and a rail connectivity with central Asia.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

We don't want third party interfere in Kashmir.

If you claim Gilgit-Baltistan might as well claim Aksai Chin. as per the guy in the video

 

[genmirajborgza786]

Why does India have such problem with it?

China is just using its power for "peaceful ways"... Hehe... One Chinese base in Maldives, one in Gwadar, and one in Bangladesh

India will be surrounded on all sides

Bhartiya tiger reduced to a kitten

man whats wrong with you ? , cant you post normally you just keep trolling in every thread

 

[genmirajborgza786]

Well , by the term "resolving" kashmir issue , you obviously mean either giving it independence or recognizing it a part of Pakistan. On the other hand rather, India wants you to recognize *** as part of India. So basically, there is no way to "resolve" the Kashmir dispute. Neither India nor Pakistan will give an inch of territory to one another. So what do you think should be done?

the transfer of the whole Kashmir region to either India or Pakistan is not feasible, but yes say some sort of give & take or some compromise in Kashmir
between India & Pakistan can be achieved provided if both parties are willing

 

[sarthak]

the transfer of the whole Kashmir region to either India or Pakistan is not feasible, but yes say some sort of give & take or some compromise in Kashmir
between India & Pakistan can be achieved provided if both parties are willing

That's the very point bro. No one is "willing" to do that. India claims the whole of Kashmir and wouldn't want to lose a single inch of land. Same with Pakistan. The only feasible solution I see is making LOC the international border.