What's new

India to Link Rivers - Got courts green light - Expart fear disaster in BD

Only surplus of water will be diverted. Rain distribution in India is not even, sometime it happen that its rain in AP, water is surplus, but no rain in TN. Due to lack of rain paddy farm in TN face problem.


Now after interlinking of river small amount of water will diverted to TN so that the paddy survive till the rain comes. I will give an example. There is water shortage in bangalore, I and you both need 3 drum of water. I have 3 but you have only 1. I will share my 1 drum water to you so that you also survive for the day, and I will spend little less today...


Hope it will go into your communist mind..

i hope this will help u to understand the concern of Kerala people

Home page of Pampa Parirakshana Samithy Kerala State India

its not a matter of water sharing,if Kerala got excess of water no problem of sharing water to Tamil nadu or Karnataka ...
 
.
i hope this will help u to understand the concern of Kerala people

Home page of Pampa Parirakshana Samithy Kerala State India

its not a matter of water sharing,if Kerala got excess of water no problem of sharing water to Tamil nadu or Karnataka ...


Thanks for second part. Coming to first part
1. Pollution and environment issue: It is obvious that this project affect both, but we have to bear that. I wonder why Communists don't talk about environment and pollution is china and Ex-Soviet Union?? When China made 3-gorge dam, where communists maggots were sleeping??? Indian communists are pathetic, they are born to ruin our country. So I don't believe in your link.

I talked once to an nationalist environmentalist he said "any project spoil/change the environment, adversely affect the flora and fauna. But after some decade, the nature adjust herself, Life finds it's way."

2. you have 2 option, build dams or kill million of Indian by flood or drought .
 
.
Bandhustan has managed to steal away so much of surface water from BD rivers with the help of UN-equal treaties that even our tears do not come out. It is all dry. So, we need all the Bandhustanis to shed crocodile's tear for us. Not a bad solace, though!
So It means U people of Bangdadesh Doesnt have Water, even to Clean ur A...
 
.
Bandhustan has managed to steal away so much of surface water from BD rivers with the help of UN-equal treaties that even our tears do not come out. It is all dry. So, we need all the Bandhustanis to shed crocodile's tear for us. Not a bad solace, though!
i dont understand what is your whining all about.
go ahead and whine as much as you can if it makes you happy.
 
.
All these bharatis are ridiculous. I have been disgusted by seeing the sickening mentality of the Indian like you. Based on International law India is bound to provide legal share of water to Bangladesh. This is not just your personal property that you can monopolize it. I am also surprised seeing the project specially when this country can not feed its people r dreaming to implement such project. These sort of self centered activity will only expose the real face of the so called biggest democracy to the whole world.

---------- Post added at 10:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:51 PM ----------

n stop all these discussion about all the malayalies and mallu girl in this forum. Do it in some other places. Here people are not interested to hear anything about those mallu girl or man n what they do inside their home. They are only famous for making 2x film. Thats it.

Thanks for giving the advise from the richest country of this world. Actually this project is to make us self sufficient in agricultural products and so that we can feed every one. Do we made any agreement regarding water with you?... We can give something to others only after we became self sufficient in that, if you think that is self-centered than cry as much as you can.. no problem for us..
 
.
All these bharatis are ridiculous. I have been disgusted by seeing the sickening mentality of the Indian like you. Based on International law India is bound to provide legal share of water to Bangladesh. This is not just your personal property that you can monopolize it. I am also surprised seeing the project specially when this country can not feed its people r dreaming to implement such project. These sort of self centered activity will only expose the real face of the so called biggest democracy to the whole world.

---------- Post added at 10:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:51 PM ----------

n stop all these discussion about all the malayalies and mallu girl in this forum. Do it in some other places. Here people are not interested to hear anything about those mallu girl or man n what they do inside their home. They are only famous for making 2x film. Thats it.




Plz....just because you see a label stating Malu do you really think it is so? Foolish....read up on child trafficking in bangladesh....you guys have quite a serious problem. Now back to topic. If India chooses to link rivers whats the problem? Bangladesh never stopped supporting terrorism against us? Next think harder when you support such crap in our country.
 
.
Issue bilateral, action unilateral

2012-03-01__f02.jpg


Over the years India has been assuring Bangladesh of not making any unilateral decisions on its National River Linking Project but it is building around 700 dams on its rivers and many of them are for facilitating the mega project.

Experts say despite what India has been saying, it never stopped the implementation of the project. It went on with the projects that facilitate the mega project even though the matter was pending with Indian courts. The draft of its National Water Policy 2012 also encourages inter-basin transfer of water through river-linking.

According to the final report of World Commission on Dams (WCD) in 2000, an estimated 1,700 large dams were being built in the world and India accounted for 40 percent of those dams.

The report said out of the 45,000 large and small dams in the world, India has about 4,000, which makes it the fourth, after the USA, China and Japan, country to have that many dams.

A follow up report in 2010 named “WCD 2000+10” focused more on the lasting impacts of the report. It said countries such as India and China (which combined accounts for over half of the dams in the world) continues to reject “the report for the fear that it could bring dam construction to a halt”.

No newer data was available at the World Commission on Dams website.

Many of the dams are on rivers that flow into Bangladesh.

Khalequzzaman, assistant prof of Lock Haven University of Pennsylvania, in his publication titled “Dams in NE India Implications for Bangladesh” published in 2006, mentions that India has built dams on at least 30 common rivers.

The dams and barrages India has built are causing problems in Bangladesh as its agriculture and environment is largely dependent on those rivers especially the Ganges and the Brahmaputra, experts said. The two rivers are threatened by India's controversial project, they said.

“If they divert water from the Brahmaputra, even Dhaka would be affected by salinity,” said Ainun Nishat, vice-chancellor of Brac University. “Now the most important thing is to think about what we should do if India really implements the project,” he said.

According to Ainun Nishat, it would be disastrous if India made barrages on the Brahmaputra and diverted water of the river, which is known as Jamuna in Bangladesh.

Interestingly, India continues to build dams putting Bangladesh in difficulty but objects to China's dam-building on the Brahmaputra.

Experts said India has been building dams which it would have built anyway during implementation of its river-linking project. They said the river-linking project would not work if those dams were not in place and that the building of these dams was part of the mega project. India has been constructing a barrage on the Mechi river in Bihar state for the last few years to divert the water of the Teesta towards the west to Fulhar through Mahananda-Mechi, which is visible with Google Earth.

Retired hydrologist M Inamul Haq, chairman of environment organisation Water and Environment, said, “India has been running a hydroelectric plant near Fanshideowa using diverted water of the Teesta.”

He said the water used in the plant is diverted from the Teesta before it enters Bangladesh.

India plans to divert a large portion of water form the Brahmaputra and the Ganges rivers through 30 canals, depriving and ignoring outcries of Bangladesh and some of its own states.

The drafts of the proposed National Water Policy 2012 says that with the current strategy of India, it can only use about 1,123 billion cubic metres of water out of 1,869 billion cubic metres available, if large inter-basin transfers are not made. It emphasises India's need for inter-basin water transfer, which could put Bangladesh in serious trouble.

The river-linking project was commissioned in 1982. Bangladesh has been opposing the plan since 2002 when the then Indian prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee formed a taskforce to get the project going.

The Indian Supreme Court has recently cleared the path for the implementation of the mega project. The court in its order said the central Indian government and the states concerned should participate for its "effective" implementation "in a time-bound manner".

Prior to the assurance of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh last year, an Indian delegation in 2010 assured Bangladesh of not making any unilateral decisions on the Tipaimukh Dam and river-linking project during the Joint River Commission talks on the Teesta water-sharing deal.

Also in 2006 and 2005 India assured Bangladesh that it would not implement the river-linking project without discussion with Bangladesh.

KERALA OPPOSES RIVER LINKING
The Congress-led coalition government and CPI-M led opposition in southern Indian state of Kerala yesterday came out against the Supreme Court directive to the Indian central government for implementing the river-linking project, our correspondent in New Delhi reports.

Kerala Chief Minister Oommen Chandy said Kerala would not agree to the river-linking scheme as it was "harmful" for the state.

He, however, said the Indian apex court order was not applicable to Kerala and it was relevant only to those states that had agreed on the river-linking scheme.

http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=224514
 
.
Jesus Christ...that's 32 years :confused: Srsly? What kind of morons are running this country?

It's because the Indian side were considering YOUR country we have seen these delays.



+this news sounds great for boosting the Indian economy, and I can't see why BD is upset- it experiences horrible flooding year on year, this will help counter that.
 
.
i hope this will help u to understand the concern of Kerala people

Home page of Pampa Parirakshana Samithy Kerala State India

its not a matter of water sharing,if Kerala got excess of water no problem of sharing water to Tamil nadu or Karnataka ...

Keralites at it again. Neither will you use the water to do something useful nor will you let the others use it. Bringing up some spurious claim to put a spanner in development works. Take a look at that site. Its some random guy makes a website and then you start your propaganda. The same thing happened with Mullai periyar issue. Everyone is not a fan of the Marxist policies you know?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom