What's new

India to Deploy Massive Tank Army Along Border With Pakistan

Do you think India is trying to start war with Pakistan?


  • Total voters
    171
Pakistan should launch Nasar missile with nuclear warheads and we should respond any massive attack by india by launching 100 nuclear missiles at a same time
 
. .
Pakistan will respond any attack with all the available missile and nuclear warheads in its inventory by launching them at a same time whether they are low yeild tactical missiles or high yield hydrogen bombs they will be launced together at a same time
 
.
Pakistan will respond any attack with all the available missile and nuclear warheads in its inventory by launching them at a same time whether they are low yeild tactical missiles or high yield hydrogen bombs they will be launced together at a same time

What Pak thinks today the world thinks tomorrow. With US backtracking on the order of the last 70 years, every country is on its own. In this new dog eats dog world there's no room for taking anything for granted. Pak is dead lucky in this regard....
 
.
1 tacticle missile= massive second strike by India = Goodbye Lahore Karachi Islamabad
Even a thought of such an indian strike = Pakistan unleashing hell on india to where even bacteria wouldn't survive from delhi to madhurai and from mumbai to guwahati.

Don't forget, We are the third largest nuclear weapons state in the world while your not even close. We hyper speeded our nukes up almost 2 decades ago (big mistake by Richard Armitage to threaten us with the stone ages line) while you slowed yours down to fulfill washington's nsg demands. Do the math; actual math, not the indian kind of math. But then again, more than welcome to put your money where your mouth is and just try it. ;)
 
Last edited:
.
Pakistanis fanclub is the funniest. You atleast need 10-20 nukes to level delhi alone. And only a convoy of 10-13 tanks can be effectively destroyed by a single tnw of 2-3 kilo toner according to janes research. Nuclear is just a word of deterrent. If a time ever comes you your army would rather surrender and fight another day than fight till the last man down by launching nukes and making sure the entire country is wiped out. I heard in 71 you guys surrendered around 90000 than fighting to the last man why? Why couldn't your glorious army fight till death even though you knew u can never get back the land if u loose?Best the army can do is go to other powers and beg them for a cease fire with threatening nukes. Once the nuke option is used it wont be a deterrent anymore. The possibility of nukes actually going off is more on PDF than in real world.
Go ahead mate, only stupid will believes your 450 tanks panitrates and cut all Pakistan into half.. Lol amazing..u can't even do this even to sirilanka, stop dancing pak will destroy them on your own land as we will consider them as a threat
 
.
Go ahead mate, only stupid will believes your 450 tanks panitrates and cut all Pakistan into half.. Lol amazing..u can't even do this even to sirilanka, stop dancing pak will destroy them on your own land as we will consider them as a threat

NASR and CPEC is the answer to all your conventional problems mate and for unconventional problems, well of course you got the Nukes. The military planners of India must be having a prank on you guys!! Chill !
 
.
Meet Leopard 2 inside Syrian border.....
upload_2017-1-20_22-10-50.png
 
.
What Pak thinks today the world thinks tomorrow. With US backtracking on the order of the last 70 years, every country is on its own. In this new dog eats dog world there's no room for taking anything for granted. Pak is dead lucky in this regard....
USA has created proxies all around the glob for a longtime. This is why today isolation would be beneficial to USA. USA is going back to the late 1800's and early 1900's, where they provided all the weapons and volunteers so that they know exactly when to join such conflicts and get the spoils of war.

This policy makes them richer because the debt is converted into credit.

With Trump as President and his policy to recall all companies that have expanded into friendly states indicate that they would take all the money out of these states in a very short time creating an other recession. However USD would gain strength because it would return back to State Bank of USA. This might trigger trigger a deeper recession as USD is a legal international tender for various products including Oil.

Barter deals would become very common once again. Those countries that have stored USD would sell this at a very high rate. Food security is the primary aim for survival.

Now on topic.
Even if India deploy massively along the borders the issue would be resupplies in case of war. Since the past few days many officers of the Indian Armed Forces have been criticizing on what they are being given to eat.

The Indian members on this forum do not realize that the minimum resistance Pakistan would give would be equal to what the Indians give. There are different ways to ensure this...It is not an eye for an eye rather an eye for a leg.
They talk about Nuclear War as if it is a joke. The outcome of a Nuclear War would not remain a local issue rather it would have implications for the entire world.
 
.
Cheast trumping again. India has over 2000 tanks and they cant be used on border with china figure.


so does Pakistan
if its such a clean chit , why does india not ever had courage to move across? even when USSR armour was breathing down pak neck and a combined pincer with USSR and indian armour would have been very difficult to deal with. ... india never dared....
 
.
Even a thought of such an indian strike = Pakistan unleashing hell on india to where even bacteria wouldn't survive from delhi to madhurai and from mumbai to guwahati.

Don't forget, We are the third largest nuclear weapons state in the world while your not even close. We hyper speeded our nukes up almost 2 decades ago (big mistake by Richard Armitage to threaten us with the stone ages line) while you slowed yours down to fulfill washington's nsg demands. Do the math; actual math, not the indian kind of math. But then again, more than welcome to put your money where your mouth is and just try it. ;)
You are talking out of 2012 stat.It's 2017..Nobody knows actual numbers.Some leaks also say it's more than 300 we have.According to FMO India produces far far more weapon grade Plutonium than Pakistan annually..;)

Also you have to use different platforms to deliver nuke..You don't even have proper sub & your 60's Mirages will be shooted like duck..You can't launch all of your nukes same time..

After first launch we will take care of the rest..Don't worry we will shock you..
 
.
You are talking out of 2012 stat.It's 2017..Nobody knows actual numbers.Some leaks also say it's more than 300 we have.According to FMO India produces far far more weapon grade Plutonium than Pakistan annually..;)

Also you have to use different platforms to deliver nuke..You don't even have proper sub & your 60's Mirages will be shooted like duck..You can't launch all of your nukes same time..

After first launch we will take care of the rest..Don't worry we will shock you..

Build some toilets... stench is killing us
 
. .
Hopefully our anti tank rockets will make short work of them. They are also relatively cheap compared to tanks so double win for Pakistan.
ATGM (Missiles)..not rockets....RPG(rocket) has many limitations

These can be countered by our very large attack heli fleet. But nonetheless this should be a wake-up call for fast induction and production of the Al-Haider.
you would rather use ATGM platforms to counter enemy tanks than pitching own MBT's against them.

Own MBT's are conserved to make a thrust inside India on offensive.

thediplomat_2017-01-19_21-30-12-386x257.jpg


The Indian Army is set to deploy over 460 new T-90SM main battle tanks (MBTs) along India’s border with Pakistan, senior Indian defense officials told IHS Jane’s Defense Weekly on January 19.

The new T-90SM MBT (other designations T-90AM or T-90MS) is the latest and most modern version of the T-90 (which in turn is a modernized variant of the T-72 MBT), and has specifically been designed for export by Russia.

According to IHS Jane’s Defense Weekly, the newly ordered MBTs will supplement 850-900 license-built T-90S Bhishma tanks, divided into 18 regiments, and currently deployed in the Indian states of Rajasthan and Punjab. It is unclear how many T-90S and T-90SM in total are currently in service with the Indian Army. (Estimates vary from 800 to 1,200 MBTs in various stages of operational readiness.)

Source: http://thediplomat.com/2017/01/india-to-deploy-massive-tank-army-along-border-with-pakistan/

how much time will be taken for deployment?

Indian IAB's are deployed near borders. Is it replacement of older tanks on border or new formations moving for escalation?
 
.
1 tacticle missile= massive second strike by India = Goodbye Lahore Karachi Islamabad
Yes and a big goodbye to rotten filthbag that is Mumbia , Kolkata , Delhi..........

Pakistanis fanclub is the funniest. You atleast need 10-20 nukes to level delhi alone. And only a convoy of 10-13 tanks can be effectively destroyed by a single tnw of 2-3 kilo toner according to janes research. Nuclear is just a word of deterrent. If a time ever comes you your army would rather surrender and fight another day than fight till the last man down by launching nukes and making sure the entire country is wiped out. I heard in 71 you guys surrendered around 90000 than fighting to the last man why? Why couldn't your glorious army fight till death even though you knew u can never get back the land if u loose?Best the army can do is go to other powers and beg them for a cease fire with threatening nukes. Once the nuke option is used it wont be a deterrent anymore. The possibility of nukes actually going off is more on PDF than in real world.
How many of you guys surrendered themselves and their families in Panipat! you Ganga folks are the last people in the world to talk alpha, even the Brits did not consider you folks as men.Log off dude.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom