Keysersoze
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2006
- Messages
- 4,858
- Reaction score
- 2
--------------------------------------------------------------
If atleast 50% of the components are designed/manufactured locally, the product can be called as indigeneous. It would be wrong to call AK as a pakistani tank because it is designed and developed by China. Thomas Alva Edison knew 999 reasons WHY bulb filament is make like it is. But others only know 1 way how it is made. R&D is something similar. You can only duplicate AK, but we can modify Arjun to get Tank-Ex. If you say that you have designed AK we can say we have designed T-90, but both statements are stupid, but the difference is, we dont make stupid statements. And please dont boast about your scientists, did you ever think how a country which has never launched a satellite itself can design missiles which re-enter from space. This itself shows that they have imported the missiles. LOL
Also Tank-EX is simply a re-work of the existing hardware to get around the problem of transporting Arjun in the existing Indian infrastructure.
> Tank-Ex is specifically designed to reduce the weight of Arjun which is the prime concern, as it affects the mobility.
Yes, the Indian Army is reluctant to induct the Arjun because of technical issues, this is a good sign, it indicates that we prefer quality weapons. Not like Jf-17. LoL.
And if you say T-90 is equally powerful as T-72, it only shows your technical in-expertise.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please, check out the research paper on Arjun at below link:
http://www.ipcs.org/IPCS-Special-Report-23.pdf
It says more than 50% of Arjun's components are imported, hence if we go by your formulae, Arjun is definately not an indigenous tank.
You have all the right to reject the paper by saying it a piece of trash or a writer is a lier.
I object, OFF Topic. Please, choose relevant threads for your valueable notes.
See how **** you are. You talk about Arjun in a forum started for T-90 purchase and you object for off topic. lol
Please read the threads properly before making comments, that was a reply to someone else's comment. BTW, its seems that you agree that JF-17 is low quality product.!!
BTW, if there is another war, I am waiting for Alkhalid Nagar to be created. Have you heard of patton Nagar?
Khemkaran - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am sure some coward will suggest deleting this reply. Thats what you are!!
You just showed you are even more!
If you want me to name imported products like you....
We have the T-90 and Sukhoi 30 MKI's which are more than a match and will eat those little kids.
PAK-FA you seem to think that calling other member stupid somehow changes facts and makes you right. However I will point out a few things (which I suggest you take on board before you take a break from posting in this thread (leave it to your more erudite colleagues)
1) Tank ex has been as always has been a T-72 chassis and sticking a Arjun turret on it. SO it has a heavier turret with a larger gun on a torsion bar suspension. From everything I have read on it it was a failure. Otherwise there would be no need to order a thousand new tanks.
2)The whole quality weapons comment made me laugh though. It seems that you are prepared to wait until the army has No weapons left until they even look at something new. At that point it won't really matter if the enemy drives in on a carnival float because the IA will be waiting for their quality weapons to show up
3)Don't try to doubt the technical credentials of others, when all you spout is patent nonsense.