What's new

India talks tough on one-China policy, says reaffirm one-India policy first

We keep Aksai Chin, while you can keep South Tibet.

Do you still think this treaty is unfair?

This will never materialize,,,as i said the democracy will never let us do it.
People will make a hue and cry,the government will fall.

So no party can ever take that risk,not in 1000 years.
Its ur government that can do whatever it pleases without any backlash from people.

As i said before chinese need serious strong allies in future,,,russia as u very well know is on serious decline and in 2030's or so it will be weak as shyte.So to sustain and make brics a successful endeavour,even sco in the future u need powerful partners and keeping future in mind there is no one apart from india that can counter the west along with china and russia.So what i am saying is for long term perspective in mind.
 
.
This will never materialize,,,as i said the democracy will never let us do it.
People will make a hue and cry,the government will fall.

So no party can ever take that risk,not in 1000 years.
Its ur government that can do whatever it pleases without any backlash from people.

As i said before chinese need serious strong allies in future,,,russia as u very well know is on serious decline and in 2030's or so it will be weak as shyte.So to sustain and make brics a successful endeavour,even sco in the future u need powerful partners and keeping future in mind there is no one apart from india that can counter the west along with china and russia.So what i am saying is for long term perspective in mind.

Then no physical treaty and status quo is the best solution.

The US always loves to send the impostors to play as the ultra-nationalists, then fuel up the tension.

So the safest way is the status quo without the treaty.
 
.
Then no physical treaty and status quo is the best solution.

The US always loves to send the impostors to play as the ultra-nationalists, then fuel up the tension.

So the safest way is the status quo without the treaty.

Then forget any friendly relation in the future.
U will certainly feel the heat in coming decades due to this stubbornness.

If i was the pm of india i would have derecognised tibet as part of china,,,untill u guys reciprocate for arunachal and ladakh.

The fact of the matter is china has other serious foes like japan and usa to take care of so india has nothing to fear in the future and by this statement we have proved our strong intent in the matter.
 
.
We can acknowledge the AP state if you acknowledge our Aksai Chin.

For the sake of the BRICS, we can step in for the negotiation, so hopefully India can do the same.

You government asks India to acknowledge One China & at the same time make claim on territory that India holds. Aksai Chin is not even part of what China wants on One China, there is absolutely no reason for India to agree on a One China policy unilaterally. If China wants One China policy to be affirmed, it will have to give something in return. Aksai Chin will have to be decided through talks and it is quite possible China's control may be accepted if the Chinese made concessions elsewhere.
 
.
Then forget any friendly relation in the future.
U will certainly feel the heat in coming decades due to this stubbornness.

If i was the pm of india i would have derecognised tibet as part of china,,,untill u guys reciprocate for arunachal and ladakh.

The fact of the matter is china has other serious foes like japan and usa to take care of so india has nothing to fear in the future and by this statement we have proved our strong intent in the matter.
You smartly mentioned Ladakh and left Aksai Chin. :D Modi bhakt :P
 
.
If i was the pm of india i would have derecognised tibet as part of china,,,untill u guys reciprocate for arunachal and ladakh.

That would be a logical position to take. Recognition of Tibet as an autonomous part of the PRC was unnecessary and should have been connected to a total resolution of the border.
 
.
You smartly mentioned Ladakh and left Aksai Chin. :D Modi bhakt :P

Its just the memory man,,,we say ladakh in india.
And i am bhakt of no man,,,,not sure of the other sex though:lol:

That would be a logical position to take. Recognition of Tibet as an utonomous part of the PRC was unnecessary and should have been connected to a total resolution of the border.

We can still do it,,,chinese are too preoccupied with scs to even bother ever having a war with us,,nothing to fear really
 
.
Why doesn't India just make peace with China by accepting their legitimate claim on Arunachal Pradesh?
 
. .
We will gift Azad Kashmir to Israel the day we do the above. Give them jewish people a new homeland.

I would be willing to consider that fair if the Jewish people had any claim over 'Azad Kashmir'. But Chinese claim holds true for centuries.
 
.
I would be willing to consider that fair if the Jewish people had any claim over 'Azad Kashmir'. But Chinese claim holds true for centuries.

We will gift them ...our claim to Kashmir makes it legitimate. :azn:

The chinese...let them try..:drag:
 
.
NEW DELHI: India on Monday took a tough line ahead of Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to India later this month. "For India to agree to a one-China policy, China should reaffirm a one-India policy," external affairs minister Sushma Swaraj said.

"When they raised with us the issue of Tibet and Taiwan, we shared their sensitivities. So, we want they should understand and appreciate our sensitivities regarding Arunachal Pradesh," the minister said.

India has refused to endorse the "one-China" policy since 2010, removing it from a joint statement during the visit of former premier Wen Jiabao to New Delhi.

Describing the India-China relationship as being "very good" but one of "competition and cooperation", Swaraj promised the forthcoming visit by Xi Jinping to India would be "substantial and solid".

READ ALSO: Modi takes 'swipe' at China, deplores 'expansionist' tendency of some nations

She played down Modi's remarks in Japan which were believed to be aimed at China, saying those were actually not aimed at anyone. This was an attempt to gloss over a remark which must have rankled in China while making Modi's Japanese hosts happy. Swaraj said, "He never referred to any specific country. It was media's guess. He spoke about 18th century expansionism." Addressing Japanese businessmen, PM had taken a swipe at China, albeit without naming the country. "There are 18th-century-style ways and thinking that involve expanding (geographically) by taking away the land of another nation and going into seas," he had said.


A July 16, 2014 picture shows Prime Minister Narendra Modi (L) and China's President Xi Jinping shake hands ahead of a photocall during the BRICS-UNASUR Summit in the Bazilian city of Brasilia. (AFP photo)

Swaraj said she was headed to Afghanistan in the next couple of days. Later this month, she said, India and Bangladesh would discuss the land boundary agreement and Teesta water sharing pact at the forthcoming joint consultative commission (JCC) meeting on September 20. "The Land Boundary Agreement was already introduced in Rajya Sabha and referred to the select committee. The select committee has been reconstituted now. Political consultations are under way," she said.


READ ALSO: China or Japan? India does a balancing act

However, Swaraj was caught off-guard while fielding a question on the prospect of Scotland's independence. It was clear that she had not been briefed by her officials that there was a definite possibility of Scotland breaking away from Britain. Swaraj reacted incredulously when asked how India viewed the prospect of the possible break-up of UK. After gathering her thoughts, she said India would go with what Scotland wanted.
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom