India talks tough on one-China policy, says reaffirm one-India policy first

[Ragnar]

wait what India doesn't recognize Pakistan,Bangladesh,Sri Lanka as independent nations??

Vee want Yeverything.. Vee are like this onlee..

 

[he-man]

Chinese should be pragmatic now...................they can solve the border dispute and make india a friend which will come handy in decades to come considering bad blood between china and most of the developed world.

It needs serious allies

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

India (current state) + Pakistan + Burma + Bhutan + Nepal + Sri Lanka - bangladesh = One India

Burma and Bhutan are not Indo-Aryan nations, they shouldn't be included in the Greater India.

Tibetan and Han are closely related brothers who both descended from the proto-Sino-Tibetan folks in Northwest China, so it is more natural for Tibet being included in the Sinosphere than in the Indosphere.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Burma and Bhutan are not Indo-Aryan nations, they shouldn't be included in the Greater India.

Tibetan and Han are closely related brothers who both descended from the proto-Sino-Tibetan folks in Northwest China, so it is more natural for Tibet being included in the Sinosphere than in the Indosphere.

I like the terms Sinosphere and Indosphere

Smells like a Molotov Ribbentrop Pact. Hope it does not go sour too

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Chinese should be pragmatic now...................they can solve the border dispute and make india a friend which will come handy in decades to come considering bad blood between china and most of the developed world.

It needs serious allies

We will keep Aksai Chin, while you can keep South Tibet.

This status quo is the greatest compromise we can concede so far, so you guys shouldn't ask for more.

 

[he-man]

We will keep Aksai Chin, while you can keep South Tibet.

This status quo is the greatest compromise we can concede so far, so you guys shouldn't ask for more.

We want nothing ...............just let the lac be treated as de facto border.
By the way leh ,ladakh is totally barren and worthless.

But the indian pride will never let us give it away so there comes chinese pragmatism.
If no,,,it would be a serious blunder and come to haunt chinese in future.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

You forgot Tibet

Tibet has never being a part of India.

But she was part of China for over 700 years, and it will remain so.

We want nothing ...............just let the lac be treated as de facto border.
By the way leh ,ladakh is totally barren and worthless.

But the indian pride will never let us give it away so there comes chinese pragmatism.
If no,,,it would be a serious blunder and come to haunt chinese in future.

We think more about the long term than the short term.

So the status quo is the best choice for both nations.

 

[GORKHALI]

On serious note,One India Policy -You need to give back the Aksai chin and need to recognise and cease your activity in P.O.K as this is disputed land.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

On serious note,One India Policy -You need to give back the Aksai chin and need to recognise and cease your activity in P.O.K as this is disputed land.

We didn't ask you to concede South Tibet, yet you wanna take Aksai Chin from us?

This kind of unilateral attitude will not solve the border dispute.

 

[he-man]

Tibet has never being a part of India.

But she was part of China for over 700 years, and it will remain so.



We think more about the long term than the short term.

So the status quo is the best choice for both nations.

U chinese seriously overestimate urself.
No doubt the going is strong now but u guys have made almost half ur immediate neighbours as ur enemies with this attitude.

While phillipines,vietnam will not sting but having beef with india,japan,usa+phillipines+vietnam will sting in the future.
By making lac as defacto border u can keep india out of equation in the future.

And that would be good for china.

If no,we have nothing to loose really,things will continue as they have for past 6 decades

 

[Bang Galore]

wait what India doesn't recognize Pakistan,Bangladesh,Sri Lanka as independent nations??

It's about the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh which China does not recognise and makes claim on that terrirory.

 

[Ragnar]

Tibet has never being a part of India.

But she was part of China for over 700 years, and it will remain so.

It was joke, brother. No one is going anywhere.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

We didn't ask you to concede South Tibet, yet you wanna take Aksai Chin from us?

This kind of unilateral attitude will not solve the border dispute.

We recognize Aksai Chin as yours.

You recognize Arunchal as ours.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

U chinese seriously overestimate urself.
No doubt the going is strong now but u guys have made almost half ur immediate neighbours as ur enemies with this attitude.

While phillipines,vietnam will not sting but having beef with india,japan,usa+phillipines+vietnam will sting in the future.
By making lac as defacto border u can keep india out of equation in the future.

And that would be good for china.

If no,we have nothing to loose really,things will continue as they have for past 6 decades

We keep Aksai Chin, while you can keep South Tibet.

Do you still think this treaty is unfair?

It's about the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh which China does not recognise and makes claim on that terrirory.

We can acknowledge the AP state if you acknowledge our Aksai Chin.

For the sake of the BRICS, we can step in for the negotiation, so hopefully India can do the same.

 

[SrNair]

Wow that was a tough foreign policy talking.