Make your case in substantive fashion or allow your government to do so. Afghanistan is a place where anything is possible.
The case has been made, substantively, and your people agree, even if unofficially, as the references in this thread indicate. The word from Pakistan is that the case has been made strongly once again, and Hollbrooke got an earful. What is left at this point, as I said earlier, is for the US to cease being duplicitous, and exert pressure on the Indians to come into line. On that count the US has so far acted more as an enemy than an ally or friend.
I could be wrong but I don't believe so. It'll be to others to change my mind, though. There's nobody here who can successfully do so. Not with what we know right now anyway.
Even the 'South Asia expert' writing in to defend India admitted Indian involvement in Baluchistan. Your biases will not let you be convinced S-2. I realized that with our first exchange, when you launched into a diatribe against Pakistan over my questioning of Ralph Peters drivel about dividing Pakistan.
You continuously choose to go into tirades about our 'long and continuing history embracing proxy warfare', while conveniently ignoring the US's own even 'longer and continuing history embracing proxy warfare', as does selective amnesia strike you over India's comparably 'long and continuing history embracing proxy warfare'.
You can remain unconvinced, but valid sources have been posted here, both Western and Pakistani, clearly indicating not just that Indian is supporting terrorism in Pakistan, but that US intelligence is aware of it. Your government is therefore indirectly complicit in the murder of Pakistani civilians and soldiers.
The question is not of providing evidence anymore, it has been provided and it is clear it has been validated, the question is whether the US will act as a responsible ally and partner of Pakistan in the WoT, and apply the necessary pressure on India to cease its activities. Greater cooperation from Pakistan will then also be forthcoming. As I said in another thread, the links Pakistan does maintain with some Taliban figures are done with the full knowledge of the US - they may not like it, but they know our reasons.
Yes. I know about the meeting with U.S., Musharaff, Kiyani, et al. I'm fascinated by the disclosures as reported. A very one-sided picture replete with details galore but utterly devoid of any U.S. reaction. You sure told it to us by the looks of things, eh?
And when was the last time the drivel in the NYT and WaPo, passing off tripe about 'tapping into Secure Mil. conversations', presented the Pakistani side of events while painting the ISI and PA as the Devil incarnate?
Again a serious lack of objectivity on your part S-2 - you see one sided pictures in the Pakistani papers yet ignore the exact same in the West.