India strongly objects to Pakistan raising Kashmir issue at UN General Assembly session

[Dean Winchester]

if we were crying then you would be happy not upset...its a logical conclusion that we are putting asses on fire

We are actually just teasing the crying pakistan

 

[shahbaz baig]

the point is world already know what is happening in kashmir.. killing innocents, raping girls. teasing students..
when world already know but still keep quiet then pakistan should not only rise the voice infront of UN but also infront of muslim alliance.. furthermore ask help from russia and china at UN to atleast support kashmiris rights morally..

 

[Sankpal]

how many times they will gonna cry in UN.

i feel like.... jab tak hai jaan.

 

[Vazir]

The Simla Agreement states that issues should be solved by bilateral discussions and agreements. That must be done, or else we keep adding to our covert involvement in Kashmir

 

[Radio Mirchi]

The Simla Agreement states that issues should be solved by bilateral discussions and agreements. That must be done, or else we keep adding to our covert involvement in Kashmir

Thats what we keep trying to make you understand that your covert operations in Kashmir are a hindrance to a meaningful dialogue. Talks and Terror can not go together.

 

[Vazir]

Thats what we keep trying to make you understand that your covert operations in Kashmir are a hindrance to a meaningful dialogue. Talks and Terror can not go together.

If we never intervened, y'all would've pulled a Vajpayee and laid strength to your claim that Kashmir is not a disputed region. No, both terrorism and issue of Kashmir should be discussed together because they are interlinked.

 

[Major Sam]

Who cares about Baniya, Dehati Aurat Always objects but no one gives a Flying FCUK.

 

[BetterPakistan]

Really??? Cause it is Pakistan that is crying in front of UN fir decades with no avail

We are not crying in front of UN, its india who cries everywhere against Pakistan and gets a punch right in their face. I remember how your Sur-gi-kal strikes claim was ridiculed by the world.

 

[Radio Mirchi]

If we never intervened, y'all would've pulled a Vajpayee and laid strength to your claim that Kashmir is not a disputed region. No, both terrorism and issue of Kashmir should be discussed together because they are interlinked.

As long as your covert operations will continue in Kashmir there can not be a meaningful dialogue. And in the absence of a meaningful dialogue the issue can not be resolved. When Gen Musharraf agreed to withdraw the jihadis from Kashmir and he actually did it, the real meaningful dialogues took place. But then he lost his power and Mumbai attack happened and things went back to square one. Its clear that some power centers in Pakistan do not want to resolve the Kashmir issue and prefer the status quo as it serves their interests.

 

[Vazir]

As long as your covert operations will continue in Kashmir there can not be a meaningful dialogue. And in the absence of a meaningful dialogue the issue can not be resolved. When Gen Musharraf agreed to withdraw the jihadis from Kashmir and he actually did it, the real meaningful dialogues took place. But then he lost his power and Mumbai attack happened and things went back to square one. Its clear that some power centers in Pakistan do not want to resolve the Kashmir issue and prefer the status quo as it serves their interests.

Both of these things can be discussed in the same meeting, sir.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Isn't hafiz saeed and masood Sahara a bilateral issue?
Crimes against humanity by Indian army are not bilateral issue but issue of whole world. Kill the Kashmir is and justify it by claiming it a bilateral issue is what only dogs can do.

As long as your covert operations will continue in Kashmir there can not be a meaningful dialogue. And in the absence of a meaningful dialogue the issue can not be resolved. When Gen Musharraf agreed to withdraw the jihadis from Kashmir and he actually did it, the real meaningful dialogues took place. But then he lost his power and Mumbai attack happened and things went back to square one. Its clear that some power centers in Pakistan do not want to resolve the Kashmir issue and prefer the status quo as it serves their interests.

did India filled it's promise too?
Did India stopped kalboshan taxable from terrorism or did India proved any of Pakistan covert operation?
We will one day fight a nuclear war and join and I both know it.

 

[Radio Mirchi]

Isn't hafiz saeed and masood Sahara a bilateral issue?
Crimes against humanity by Indian army are not bilateral issue but issue of whole world. Kill the Kashmir is and justify it by claiming it a bilateral issue is what only dogs can do.


did India filled it's promise too?
Did India stopped kalboshan taxable from terrorism or did India proved any of Pakistan covert operation?
We will one day fight a nuclear war and join and I both know it.

First of all, No person with a sane mind will ever talk of a nuclear war. All real nuclear powers display highest level of maturity when it comes to nukes.

Both India and Pakistan have given word (ZABAAN) under Simla Accord of 1972 that they both will address the Kashmir issue bilaterally. In almost all cultures giving Zabaan has a greate value, even greater than life in many cases. If you were not confident and capable of resolving the Kashmir issue bilaterally, you should not have agreed to it. The matter was anyways referred to the UN and a resolution was pending. So what made Pakistan undermine the UN resolution and agree to a bilateral negotiations? And even more intriguing is what makes Pakistan go back on its zabaan? And if the so called genocide of Kashmiris are such a big international issue then why no other nation ever talks about it?

And what is there to prove the covert operations of Pakistan in Kashmir when you guys openly admit it. Even Pervez Musharraf and many of your political leaders keep giving statements about it.

 

[Mangus Ortus Novem]

The lady protests too much, methinks!



Stop killing unarmed Kashmiris, leave Kashmir...then Pak has nothing to say.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

First of all, No person with a sane mind will ever talk of a nuclear war. All real nuclear powers display highest level of maturity when it comes to nukes.

Both India and Pakistan have given word (ZABAAN) under Simla Accord of 1972 that they both will address the Kashmir issue bilaterally. In almost all cultures giving Zabaan has a greate value, even greater than life in many cases. If you were not confident and capable of resolving the Kashmir issue bilaterally, you should not have agreed to it. The matter was anyways referred to the UN and a resolution was pending. So what made Pakistan undermine the UN resolution and agree to a bilateral negotiations? And even more intriguing is what makes Pakistan go back on its zabaan? And if the so called genocide of Kashmiris are such a big international issue then why no other nation ever talks about it?

And what is there to prove the covert operations of Pakistan in Kashmir when you guys openly admit it. Even Pervez Musharraf and many of your political leaders keep giving statements about it.

in the same year in 1972india broke simla agreement by capturing 8 pakistani posts on LOC which were un manned at that time.
in 1984 india violated it again and captured siachin and later came up with a story that it is not part of simla aggreement.
India than brokesimla aggreement when they decided not to solve problems using dialogues and is running away from it which is against the spirit of simla aggreement. And the giving preconditions is also not part od sila aggreement.
India took mumbai attack issue to UN and went to UN against pakistani groups. wasn't it against simla aggreement.

Human rights violations werenot allowed in simla aggreement and india is doing it in kashmir. Asing us to sit quite while our innocent brothers are being killed is against simla aggreement than we would break it for sure. Humanity comes first before any aggreement.

Secondly about nuclear war, i want to tell you it's our belief that one day it will happen. And india's attitude toward kashmir, rule of extreists and human rights violations against kashmiris is the reason that it will happen for sure.
OIC talk about it, chinese talk about it. They are half of world.
US newspapers, UK newspapers and people and newspapers from all world are talking about it.

 

[Riz]

Pak should raise khalistan and mosets miscare in the hands of indian forces too... Tit for tat policy is necessary to counter propaganda state of india