What's new

India slams UNSC's inability to sanction leaders of terror organisations

cry india cry. you ban them they will change name and will do what they want unless kashmir problem is solved, which you don't want to solve. solve the core of the issue because you can't ban everyone.

There is difference, when we put forward an issue UN bans organisation and they have to change name to operate.

When Pakistan showcases and cry loud on Kulbhushan video, even friends like China/ GCC not issue a statement (forget about actions / naming terror organisation) :chilli::chilli::chilli::chilli:

Modi himself is a far bigger terrorist than anyone else, didn't he slaughter thousands in Indians in the Gujarat massacre?

Now complaining about other terrorists?
Your opinion is based on what you read on PDF, or paid media by Congress (opposition in India)
There were allegations and he was given clean chit by Supreme Court (when Congress was in Power)

I was active when you joined this forum recently came back, your opinion has changed a lot in last 5-6 yeas after reading crappy opinions on PDf
 
.
There is difference, when we put forward an issue UN bans organisation and they have to change name to operate.

When Pakistan showcases and cry loud on Kulbhushan video, even friends like China/ GCC not issue a statement (forget about actions / naming terror organisation) :chilli::chilli::chilli::chilli:
it doesn't matter hat the world says but kalboshan helped us to neutraize your 3 big terrorists network. RAW loses.
 
.
http://www.deccanherald.com/content/590924/india-criticises-frozen-unsc-represents.html
United Nations, Jan 11, 2017 (PTI)
590924_thump.jpg

Criticising a "frozen" UN Security Council that represents a small minority of the world's population, India said only an "updated" and not "outdated" global institution can be effective in addressing the current challenges of conflict prevention and sustaining peace.

"While the world is changing, the institutional architecture primarily responsible for areas of peace and security remains frozen. The Security Council which takes decisions on behalf of 'we the people' represents an increasingly small minority of the world's population," India's Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador Syed Akbaruddin said at a Council debate here yesterday on 'Conflict Prevention and Sustaining Peace'.

Akbaruddin said if the 15-nation Council has to make rules for "the people" and not just a small minority, it needs to adequately reflect new realities.

"Addressing new issues, threats and challenges of the twenty first century needs an updated, not an outdated instrument. A Security Council which has lost its legitimacy cannot be-an effective tool to address the challenges of conflict prevention and sustaining peace," he said.

With the established international order being upended in terms of economic, political and technological shifts, Akbaruddin said long-established states too are unable to fully respond to the "new factors and forces being unleashed".

"History teaches us that ungoverned swathes often become grounds for competition or are storehouses for germination of new threats. Yet, we have no global governance architecture in frontier areas such as cyber, space and oceans. We ignore these at our own peril," he said.

The Indian envoy stressed that prevention efforts can only be effective if they are undertaken with the consent and cooperation of the Member States concerned and are not seen as an imposition.

"As the saying goes 'you cannot shake hands with a clenched fist'," he said.

Akbaruddin told the Council meeting India believes that for the UN to develop a culture of conflict prevention, the world body needs to recognise that the primary responsibility for sustaining peace lies with Member States and the UN can only supplement what are essentially home-grown processes.

"The emphasis on analytical instruments and tools such as fact-finding, agenda setting, diplomatic initiatives, peace operations is important but is too narrow an approach...We provide too few resources to strengthen institutional inadequacies of Member States and instead focus on strengthening institutional arrangements of the UN," he said.

With efforts at prevention having failed to take firm institutional roots, Akbaruddin said such a scenario raises the question of why the international community has not got it right and whether the nations are using the right tools in the wrong way.
 
.
lol, so funny. At one hand brag it's not important, useless agency.
At another hand, wasting precious dollars to fly around to beg....
Come on, stop it!
It's losing face.
Modi's favourite dish at last year's g20 meeting was beggar's chicken

UN should sanction Gujrat genocide responsible..
That would make Modi a terrorist
 
. .
That would make Modi a terrorist

do you have any doubt that bharat is harboring its biggest terrorist in its PM house? i dont think any freedom fighter so far have killed so much bharti civilian as modi "The Terrorist" did..

Not only Gujrat genocide, these RSS scums were behind samjhota express blast, in which nearly 70 people lost their lives, most of the victims were Pakistanis..

RSS is part of all communal riots in gangaland till date..

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...umbai-police-officer/articleshow/49943534.cms
 
.
do you have any doubt that bharat is harboring its biggest terrorist in its PM house? i dont think any freedom fighter so far have killed so much bharti civilian as modi "The Terrorist" did..

Not only Gujrat genocide, these RSS scums were behind samjhota express blast, in which nearly 70 people lost their lives, most of the victims were Pakistanis..

RSS is part of all communal riots in gangaland till date..

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...umbai-police-officer/articleshow/49943534.cms
No doubt. Modi is a terrorist himself. He harbouring any terrorist is not surprising
 
.
https://www.thehindu.com/news/natio...a-president/article24682645.ece?homepage=true

India raises terror, UNSC reforms with UNGA president

NEW DELHI, August 13, 2018 23:46 IST
Updated: August 13, 2018 23:46 IST


Visiting team meets Modi, Sushma
Ahead of the convening of the 73rd session of the U.N. General Assembly, India has indicated that the campaign against global terrorism will be on top of its U.N. agenda.

External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj conveyed India’s concerns regarding the issue to the visiting U.N.GA president María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés, who maintained that there is not yet a consensus among the member-states about the definition of terrorism.

U.N.SC reforms

“The External Affairs Minister emphasised the need for U.N. Security Council (UNSC) reforms, especially continuation of the Inter-Governmental Negotiations, as well as early finalisation of the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism,” said the MEA in an official press release, following the meeting between the delegations of the Minister and the U.N. president.

Ms. Garces, the fourth woman president in the history of the largest organ of the U.N. interacted with Ms. Swaraj and Prime Minister Narendra Modi during her four-day visit.

In an interaction at the Indian Council of World Affairs (ICWA), she said India’s demand for expansion of the U.N.SC featured in the discussion with the Prime Minister and indicated that she would try to build consensus among all U.N. member-states regarding issues such as expansion of the UNSC and counter-terrorism.

Ms. Garces said she will appoint two co-facilitators to help her address reform issues.

The U.N. is currently in the process of implementing reform process on fronts such as peace and security, development and management reforms and better coordination among the principal organs of the U.N.

The visit also provided Indian decision makers to inform the U.N. official about India’s continued commitment on South-South cooperation.

In a meeting organised by the Research and Information System in Developing Societies (RIS) T.S. Tirumurti, Secretary (Economic Relations) of the MEA said, “South-South Cooperation has traditionally been an important pillar of India’s foreign policy, covering areas like development, defence and security…It will only continue to strengthen as we reach out even more to our development partners, in our neighbourhood, Africa, the Arab world, Small Island States, Southeast Asia and beyond.”
 
.
Back
Top Bottom