What's new

India slams North Korea's launch of ballistic missile, calls for dialogue. Here's why

But legally speaking India and North Korea are both NPT violators.

You too in that case.... but anyways there's a difference of a day and night in the nature of India and North Korea if we talk about responsibility
 
.
Ah, India the Vishwaguru ( Teacher to the world ), at least according to Dear Leader Modi.

But my question about this news that is if Israel can have an ICBM, if USA can have ICBM and India can have an ICBM project then why not North Korea ? Otherwise India should be asking for everyone to denuclearize and everyone to only have a defensive military and that should start with USA.
If you understood national interests, or you would care about your country where you were born, you wouldn't be asking this question. Because it just need a common sense to understand it that enemy camp should never have those weapons which pose threat to your security.
 
. .
You too in that case.... but anyways there's a difference of a day and night in the nature of India and North Korea if we talk about responsibility

china is an authorized and declared nuclear weapons state under the NPT.

you know, one of 5, all by "coincidence" are the P5 of the UNSC, sitting at the big boys table.

and NK for all your talk about it being dangerous, have only ever fought a civil war against the south and no one else. and since that time has faced the US and SK and Japan at a great disadvantage and unlike india, NK is small enough to actually cease to exist in a war.
 
.
You too in that case.... but anyways there's a difference of a day and night in the nature of India and North Korea if we talk about responsibility
i think you`re forgetting indias ill considered "peaceful" nuclear weapons test back in 74 that began a nuclear arms race in the region........very "responsible". :bad: :bad:
Personally I think indias just jealous,I mean can anyone imagine modi looking anything but a complete idiot in aviator shades and a leather jacket,oh and lets not forget that indian icbm TELs look like they were designed by someone who had never even seen a TEL before

Indian ICBM and TEL
36912776_403.jpg

DPRK ICBM and TEL
rodong-oct10-military-parade-new-11-axle-tel-icbm.jpg


Modi brown nosing zionists
modinetanyahu759.jpg

Kim looking badass
4252.jpg

See the difference?
 
.
If you understood national interests, or you would care about your country where you were born, you wouldn't be asking this question. Because it just need a common sense to understand it that enemy camp should never have those weapons which pose threat to your security.

1. You other than being Indian are before that a human and thus you cannot escape your responsibility towards desiring peace and harmony among humanity. The concept of the Nation State through which you think India is supreme and rest of humanity is not, that concept was a recent one, only 233 years old, coming about through the French Revolution so you should be thanking Napoleon and his comrades. But Nation State is a problematic concept because it creates an ecosystem of self-isolated peoples. BJP bhakts adore such Indian elements as the Jana Gana Mana which is the misguided and non-inclusive national anthem of India and written by Rabindranath Tagore but the bhakts did not read Tagore's opinion about nationalism :
I am not against one nation in particular, but against the general idea of all nations. What is the Nation?
Nationalism is a great menace. It is the particular thing which for years has been at the bottom of India's troubles. And inasmuch as we have been ruled and dominated by a nation that is strictly political in its attitude, we have tried to develop within ourselves, despite our inheritance from the past, a belief in our eventual political destiny.
India has never had a real sense of nationalism. Even though from childhood I had been taught that the idolatry of Nation is almost better than reverence for God and humanity, I believe I have outgrown that teaching, and it is my conviction that my countrymen will gain truly their India by fighting against that education which teaches them that a country is greater than the ideals of humanity.
When our nationalists talk about ideals, they forget that the basis of nationalism is wanting. The very people who are upholding these ideals are themselves the most conservative in their social practice. Nationalists say, for example, look at Switzerland, where, in spite of race differences, the peoples have solidified into a nation. Yet, remember that in Switzerland the races can mingle, they can intermarry, because they are of the same blood. In India there is no common birthright. And when we talk of Western Nationality we forget that the nations there do not have that physical repulsion, one for the other, that we have between different castes. Have we an instance in the whole world where a people who are not allowed to mingle their blood shed their blood for one another except by coercion or for mercenary purposes? And can we ever hope that these moral barriers against our race amalgamation will not stand in the way of our political unity?
Then again we must give full recognition to this fact that our social restrictions are still tyrannical, so much so as to make men cowards. If a man tells me he has heterodox ideas, but that he cannot follow them because he would be socially ostracized, I excuse him for having to live a life of untruth, in order to live at all. The social habit of mind which impels us to make the life of our fellow-beings a burden to them where they differ from us even in such a thing as their choice of food is sure to persist in our political organization and result in creating engines of coercion to crush every rational difference which, is the sign of life. And tyranny will only add to the inevitable lies and hypocrisy in our political life. Is the mere name of freedom so valuable that we should be willing to sacrifice for its sake our moral freedom?
Your national interests and mine, in parallel to speaking of the dissolving of the concept of Nation State, lies in making India to be a society that seeks peace and harmony in the world. The Nation State is an unnatural idea intellectually and physically. Show me a photo taken from space and showing a physical boundary between USA and Canada and India and Pakistan. When Imran Khan spoke some months ago about wanting 100 years of peace with India, Modi should have outdone him by saying that India wanted 500 years of peace with Pakistan but did he do that ? Did he restrain bhakts from doing their usual thing of online vileness against Pakistan ? Does Modi want peace or not ? If Modi doesn't want the "enemy camp to never have those weapons posing threat to Indian security" that sentence can also be said by Pakistan and China and thus peace will never be achieved.

2. Communists in India like me have more concern for Indians than any bhakt will have by a light year. Please read this questioning thread of mine.

3. What threat does North Korea pose to India ?

4. You use every modern facility, including the computer and the internet, created by other peoples of the world. Fake patriot BJP bhakts should stop using such things. But not even the bullock cart is theirs because the wheel was invented by a non-bhakt.
 
.
1. You other than being Indian are before that a human and thus you cannot escape your responsibility towards desiring peace and harmony among humanity. The concept of the Nation State through which you think India is supreme and rest of humanity is not, that concept was a recent one, only 233 years old, coming about through the French Revolution so you should be thanking Napoleon and his comrades. But Nation State is a problematic concept because it creates an ecosystem of self-isolated peoples. BJP bhakts adore such Indian elements as the Jana Gana Mana which is the misguided and non-inclusive national anthem of India and written by Rabindranath Tagore but the bhakts did not read Tagore's opinion about nationalism :





Your national interests and mine, in parallel to speaking of the dissolving of the concept of Nation State, lies in making India to be a society that seeks peace and harmony in the world. The Nation State is an unnatural idea intellectually and physically. Show me a photo taken from space and showing a physical boundary between USA and Canada and India and Pakistan. When Imran Khan spoke some months ago about wanting 100 years of peace with India, Modi should have outdone him by saying that India wanted 500 years of peace with Pakistan but did he do that ? Did he restrain bhakts from doing their usual thing of online vileness against Pakistan ? Does Modi want peace or not ? If Modi doesn't want the "enemy camp to never have those weapons posing threat to Indian security" that sentence can also be said by Pakistan and China and thus peace will never be achieved.

2. Communists in India like me have more concern for Indians than any bhakt will have by a light year. Please read this questioning thread of mine.

3. What threat does North Korea pose to India ?

4. You use every modern facility, including the computer and the internet, created by other peoples of the world. Fake patriot BJP bhakts should stop using such things. But not even the bullock cart is theirs because the wheel was invented by a non-bhakt.
A commie is talking about humanity? Lol
Hypocrisy had just died thousands death.
Indians don't need to learn humanity lesson from hypocrite zombies.
I can understand your issue Jamahir. You wrote "Bhakat" 10 times in your post. This is what giving you pain.
Go and give your speeches to China. Commies are dead in India. We don't need you at all. N don't care about India., you don't deserve it. Sorry to be too harsh to you Jamahir, but you deserve it.
 
.
commendable gestre
in another news
An Indian cruise missile is "accidentally" fired towards Pakistan that flies through busy commercial flights corridor and lands inside Pakistan and reliefis expressed that there is no loss of life.

innocence level maxed.
They just trying to be relevant, that's all. Lol
 
.
A commie is talking about humanity? Lol
Hypocrisy had just died thousands death.
Indians don't need to learn humanity lesson from hypocrite zombies.
I can understand your issue Jamahir. You wrote "Bhakat" 10 times in your post. This is what giving you pain.
Go and give your speeches to China. Commies are dead in India. We don't need you at all. N don't care about India., you don't deserve it. Sorry to be too harsh to you Jamahir, but you deserve it.

1. Tagore wasn't a Communist yet he spoke against nationalism and in favor of humanity. Will you consider his thoughts ?

2. Communism is a pan-human ideology whose simple Google result is :
Communism is a philosophical, social, political, and economic ideology and movement whose goal is the establishment of a communist society, namely a socioeconomic order structured upon the ideas of common or social ownership of all property and the absence of social classes, money, and the state. Wikipedia
How can anyone who believes in such wonderful sentiments ever be zombie ? Communists are clear of mind. OTOH aren't bhakts zombies who listen in rapture and without objection to Dear Leader's nonsense ?

3. Yes the bhakts give me pain because they majorly are the reason for India's problems. It is because of their 3000-year-old political and socio-economic systems that 350,000+ Indian farmers suicided between 1995 and 2015, many before and many after. It is because of them that 4+ million Indians died of COVID between late 2019 and mid 2021. It is because of them that 700 farmers protesting in Delhi died unnecessarily last year. So many such things. It wasn't the Communists in India who caused all these artificial and avoidable tragedies. If the Communists were governing India none of these would have happened so India to evolve, to become just and become harmonious it needs Communists and not right-wingers including the bhakts. The right-wingers can go to the Moon. You choose if you want the welfare of India or you want India to remain the unjust, dog-eat-dog, chaotic, disharmonious and ridiculous society it is now.

4. About China read this thread of mine :
 
Last edited:
.
1. Tagore wasn't a Communist yet he spoke against nationalism and in favor of humanity. Will you consider his thoughts ?

2. Communism is a pan-human ideology whose simple Google result is :

How can anyone who believes in such wonderful sentiments ever be zombie ? Communists are clear of mind. OTOH aren't bhakts zombies who listen in rapture and without objection to Dear Leader's nonsense ?

3. Yes the bhakts give me pain because they majorly are the reason for India's problems. It is because of their 3000-year-old political and socio-economic systems that 350,000+ Indian farmers suicided between 1995 and 2015, many before and many after. It is because of them that 4+ million Indians died of COVID between late 2019 and mid 2021. It is because of them that 700 farmers protesting in Delhi died unnecessarily. So many such things. It wasn't the Communists in India who caused all these artificial and avoidable tragedies. If the Communists were governing India none of these would have happened so India to evolve, to become just and become harmonious it needs Communists and not right-wingers including the bhakts. You choose if you want the welfare of India or you want India to remain the unjust, dog-eat-dog, chaotic, disharmonious and ridiculous society it is now.

4. About China read this thread of mine :
Even I am also against the concept of Nationalism. Even every Hindu is against the concept of nationalism as Hinduism preaches the first " Vashudev Katumbhakam" (The whole Earth is one family).
But this is not the point here.
Everyone has to behave according to the time and need. You can't behave dumb and preach " Vashudev Katumbhakam" when every one is making group and conspiracies against you. You have to take step to defend yourself and make a boundary around you to save yourself from Zombies. That's what India Is doing since the concept of nationalism came into existence. Your ideology is outdated and unreal in a real world. Reforms and changes happens and we should learn to live with those changes.
First you need to wipe out the concept of religion if you really want to justify your ideology, then come for nationalism. But you won't, because wiping out religious concept completely doesn't suits your agenda. That's why you want to keep half baked religious concept alive. You praise Islam but criticize nationalism. What a hypocrite you are! You are already exposed.

1. Tagore wasn't a Communist yet he spoke against nationalism and in favor of humanity. Will you consider his thoughts ?

2. Communism is a pan-human ideology whose simple Google result is :

How can anyone who believes in such wonderful sentiments ever be zombie ? Communists are clear of mind. OTOH aren't bhakts zombies who listen in rapture and without objection to Dear Leader's nonsense ?

3. Yes the bhakts give me pain because they majorly are the reason for India's problems. It is because of their 3000-year-old political and socio-economic systems that 350,000+ Indian farmers suicided between 1995 and 2015, many before and many after. It is because of them that 4+ million Indians died of COVID between late 2019 and mid 2021. It is because of them that 700 farmers protesting in Delhi died unnecessarily last year. So many such things. It wasn't the Communists in India who caused all these artificial and avoidable tragedies. If the Communists were governing India none of these would have happened so India to evolve, to become just and become harmonious it needs Communists and not right-wingers including the bhakts. The right-wingers can go to the Moon. You choose if you want the welfare of India or you want India to remain the unjust, dog-eat-dog, chaotic, disharmonious and ridiculous society it is now.

4. About China read this thread of mine :
And what is the definition of "Bhakat" for you? Can you elaborate?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom