What's new

India, Singapore Can Consider Warship-Building Venture, Says Expert

Nice... It looks more stealthier than Kolkata class

Did Arleigh Burke looks stealthier to you.

US_Navy_110918-N-BC134-014_The_Arleigh_Burke-class_guided-missile_destroyer_USS_Halsey_%28DDG_97%29_transits_the_Pacific_Ocean.jpg


But this is one of the most advanced warships.
 
. .
it would be cheaper for Singapore to manufacture in India. We can also learn from each other as far as design expertise are concerned.

Bro, that is the problem. We dont understand the things, the Indians are leap ahead or generation ahead in designing the warships, why we going to need Singapore help for designing warship.

Only things I see kickbacks.
 
.
But its smaller than even Kamorta class

Its actually almost equal to Komorta... But we can't compare their ship to ours as we have a habit of building over sized ships.. But the Singaporean Frigate does have a more stealthy look than Kolkata class destroyer.
 
.
Yes lethal but not most lethal of the world

Bro, Kamotra is one of the most lethal warship in world, and Singapore cant help a single bit in this area.

They dont have concept of VLS, the La Faytte uses Sylver VLS, not some Singapore made VLS. Dont delude yourself.

If they say French, or UK or Russian, I accept that. But Singapore, which didnt designed a single warship. Sorry, I dont support this crap.
 
. .
Bro, Kamotra is one of the most lethal warship in world, and Singapore cant help a single bit in this area.

They dont have concept of VLS, the La Faytte uses Sylver VLS, not some Singapore made VLS. Dont delude yourself.

If they say French, or UK or Russian, I accept that. But Singapore, which didnt designed a single warship. Sorry, I dont support this crap.

Kamorta is need more refinement & Singapore can assist us in modern designing practices though modern designing software to more smooth sea wave cutting reduce RCS, acoustic signature, & sound suppression etc.
 
.
Kamorta is need more refinement & Singapore can assist us in modern designing practices though modern designing software to more smooth sea wave cutting reduce RCS, acoustic signature, & sound suppression etc.

We already have most modern designing software, what you think the Kamotra is designed with some pencil and ruler.

Naval Shipbuilding

Thanks to @Gessler, he provided these pics

GSL-Designed%2B75-metre%2BNOPV-2.jpg

75m GSL Design for anti-ship warship.

Bro, the Singapore didnt designed a single warship, and India designing that from 1990. If you still want to remain in delusion, then sorry I cant help you out.

And dont go biased, when you see much more stealthier design in pic, or when you say Indian Warship are heavy, compare there firepower and role also.
 
.
Singapore has an excellent warship building capability, surely they can made an excellent ships with modern design, the only hurdle for them to make any big toys such as AAW frigate or destroyer for their Navy is the small pool base from their population to manned such ships.

if you have visited the ST corps. you will know what i mean
 
.
Kamorta is need more refinement & Singapore can assist us in modern designing practices though modern designing software to more smooth sea wave cutting reduce RCS, acoustic signature, & sound suppression etc.
Can U pls suggest me where does Kamorta needs refinement..??And how much ahead sinngaporean ship building Industry is in those areas???
 
.
We already have most modern designing software, what you think the Kamotra is designed with some pencil and ruler.

Naval Shipbuilding

Thanks to @Gessler, he provided these pics

GSL-Designed%2B75-metre%2BNOPV-2.jpg

75m GSL Design for anti-ship warship.

Bro, the Singapore didnt designed a single warship, and India designing that from 1990. If you still want to remain in delusion, then sorry I cant help you out.

And dont go biased, when you see much more stealthier design in pic, or when you say Indian Warship are heavy, compare there firepower and role also.

They have to only help to fine tune it just like engine manufacturers take help from AVL & Singapore also manufacture Guns which we can use joint development of naval gun.

Can U pls suggest me where does Kamorta needs refinement..??And how much ahead sinngaporean ship building Industry is in those areas???
As I previously suggested they can help us increasing smooth sea wave cutting, Stealth enhancement, joint development of naval gun.
 
.
As I previously suggested they can help us increasing smooth sea wave cutting, Stealth enhancement, joint development of naval gun.
So, these things according to what have quoted here, are very crucial in ship building??And according to you Indian ship building industry currently does not possess such capabilities?? eh??
 
.
They have to only help to fine tune it just like engine manufacturers take help from AVL & Singapore also manufacture Guns which we can use joint development of naval gun.

Firstly this article talk about Designing the ship, and not JV in weapon system. And mainly the cost in the Indian warship is from BrahMos, Baraks and Radars, not from 76mm gun.

And after ST Kinetics blacklist, I dont think Singapore able make its foot in Indian weapons procurement.
 
.
Firstly this article talk about Designing the ship, and not JV in weapon system. And mainly the cost in the Indian warship is from BrahMos, Baraks and Radars.

And after ST Kinetics blacklist, I dont think Singapore able make its foot in Indian weapons procurement.
Designing does not mean they would simply design whole ship but merely polish the design.
Ban can be removed if we get serious offer & GOI make in India campaign.
 
.
[quote="kaku1, post: 6337081, member:

GSL-Designed%2B75-metre%2BNOPV-2.jpg

75m GSL Design for anti-ship warship.

Bro, the Singapore didnt designed a single warship, and India designing that from 1990. If you still want to remain in delusion, then sorry I cant help you out.

[/quote]


Looks like dutch ship to me, Sigma.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom