maximuswarrior
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2016
- Messages
- 13,771
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
LOL they call this proof. Flying a random Su-30 and claiming it is the one that got shot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just noticed this today,
A 'chirp' is not a lock. A full on radar lock must be distinctive for the pilot to recognize a FOCUSED threat, meaning the missile is actually on him, so a 'chirp' is insufficient for an audio alert.
India convinced it's population that it's a Supa dupa pawaBoth PAF and IAF have convinced their respective nations that they shot down each other's jets and didn't lose any of their own.
Win win, in my opinion. Otherwise a retaliation would be needed.
Both PAF and IAF have convinced their respective nations that they shot down each other's jets and didn't lose any of their own.
Win win, in my opinion. Otherwise a retaliation would be needed.
India convinced it's population that it's a Supa dupa pawa
World media/pundits/OEM manufacturers and Pakistan are convinced that 1 mig shot, no f16 and maybe a su30 shot.
They only loosers here are the Indian people......but they want to be fooled so don't feel too bad for them.
World media/pundits/OEM manufacturers are convinced that 1 mig shot, no f16 and no su30 shot.
As graceful and beautiful that aircraft is, a callsign can be repetitive. I remember we used 3 forms of jets, and with lead, middle and rear were called Killer, Thunder and Storm respectively. Few months later same callsigns were used. If the IAF are to be more specific, they'd do well to declare the aircraft serial number and see if it matches the PAF claim or not.