if your conscience as an indian individual is satisfied with crippling of innocent Kashmiri children and women and young men, blinding them forever by blind and brutal use of pellet guns then pardon me there is no argument left neither point to discuss
Conscience? Seriously, you people speaking of conscience is simply laughable when most of your morality can be described as Hypocrisy at best. But ill entertain.
For one, our effort at using pellet guns is to use minimum force to control violent mobs. The intention is not to blind or hurt anyone but to deter violence. Maybe if the crowds used peaceful methods and no stone pelting, we wouldn't have to use any force period! Have you ever thought of that? Unless you consider stone pelting and vandalism of property, "peaceful" methods.
Second, why are children or women part of stone pelting to begin with? Who's fault is it that they are there? Ours or those Kashmiri parents and families that allow it? Now if you're afraid of fire, don't play with matches. Pellets cant tell the difference between children and adults. We are firing at adults who are violent. Children have no business being there. And if they are there, they are being used as human shield so that propaganda exactly the way you're positioning it can be promoted. Please don't think that for one second that we buy into your dramebazi of "innocents". This is as contrived as can be!
Lastly, you conveniently skirted my question about the life of a soldier (off duty nonetheless) whos pre-meditated murder by Kashmiris was completely skipped over by you? What would Pakistani state do if this happened to one of your soldiers? Or does his life and family not matter to achieve your political goals?
as far as Pakistani version in any matter is concerned that is not part of discussion here but kashmir. and only Kashmir the most strong and acceptable version is that of Kashmiris which is validated by presence of mass graves of Kashmiris killed by india and hundreds of women n kids and men crippled and blinded by use of pellets by indian forces.
Actually no! It is all linked and part of the same vicious cycle.
If our opinion and concerns don't matter, then we give two shits about the opinions of Kashmiris. and trust me, we got deep pockets and diplomatic clout to sustain this for a long, long time!
If Kashmiris didn't use violent mean, kill pandits, political entities that oppose their POV, soldiers, policemen, and cripple daily life of other peaceful Kashmiris, we wouldn't have to use excessive force.
Its quite simple you see. Protesting is the right of Kashmiris to get their political aspirations. Violence isn't. So everything that happens as a result of use of violence is the Chickens coming home to roost![/QUOTE]
Nope. An unarmed civilian's life is far more important.
That is the problem with your thought process as a state and as a nation. When you enroll with army, you join a combat force knowing all dangers. That soldier might be on leave and all that. But the fact is that he was a soldier and cannot be compared in any manner to that 16 year old girl Insha whom your country and its coward forces riddled with pellets.
Maybe the 16 year old girl should not have been in a protest to begin with or pelting stones at the forces. Simple.
The minute one attacks an armed forces officer, he/she becomes a combatant.
How does the PA or Pak Police deal with people that attack them? Shower them with flowers?
And the soldier you mentioned was unarmed. He was civilian at that point in time as he wasn't on duty. So I suppose if a mob can kill an unarmed soldier or policeman, then the same rules apply to the armed with stones protestors as well.
See two can play that game!
