What's new

India should accept defeat before Kashmiris’ struggle, says Nawaz

Scharfschütze said:
This is called Begherati ...
Click to expand...

WOW!!!:lazy2:


COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IS SINCERELY REGRETTED IF FELT

"....wake me up, when bullshit ends"

Inspired from the album 'The American Idiot', Track 7 'Wake Me Up When September Ends' by Green Day
 
Killing fields by the Heart of Darkness.

Dark hatred of indians is not sustainable.

They must stop their beligerence and try live in peace with their neighbours.

As an alien occupyiing force they have no hope or future in Kashmir.

More indian oppression = more indian desparations.

Wise thing is to go back to their plains whence they came from and try to live in peace and harmony with their neighbours.

Hegemony is a disease. Dark hatred is even worse.

Kashmir is free. Occupation is not sustainable. Ever.
 
Syama Ayas said:
Are you stating all from this from PLA experience in Xinjiang?

If so, good to know average Chinese brave enough to challenge CCP on its brutalities in Xinjiang.
Click to expand...

Dear Indian, if you have nothing consutructive to say, then kindly, hold your peace.

Tibet and Xinjiang are enjoying peace and development that many in certain countries can only dream off.

Dark hatred blinds the mind.

Peace and development is much better than violence and oppressioin.

india must change her beligerent ways and become partner in regional peace.

We must solve the question of South Tibet through peaceful dialouge.
 
Kashmir will always remain as an integral part of India.
Hence cross the border and take us down.
 
Azlan Haider said:
And I am quoting the UN appointed official mediator. Sir Owen Dixon reported to the UN that India’s agreement would never be obtained to demilitarization in any form ... He accused India of halting the process. Let me repeat myself, The words/opinion of the UN appointed official mediator definitely carries more weight than the words/opinions/propaganda of Indian or Pakistani government. So next time before accusing Pakistan of halting the process, please keep in mind what the official mediator had reported about this matter.
Click to expand...

when you agree to an agreement what matters is what is written in the agreement...not what you say or she says or it says. Why are you playing dumb on this.
 
EKPo3Sg.jpg
EKPo3Sg.jpg
 
http://zeenews.india.com/news/india...-in-favour-of-nawaz-sharifs-pmln_1911935.html

What a travesty..
 
hellfire said:
@Azlan Haider #259 agreed with. Was so documented.

@OrionHunter But his comment #254 point (a) - utter nonsense. The withdrawal of the tribesmen and other combatants not normally resident was the key ... subsequent to which India was to draw down the troops You need to point it to him emphatically.

rest of the points will deal with in brevity:

when he quotes resolution 98, I quote Simla Agreement where it becomes a bilateral agreement, the luxury of discussing the case in hindsight as afforded.

Like I have previously said on three instances so far to Pakistani members here: 'you unilaterally surrender your national interests' similarly, they have the propensity to not meet any single obligation as due them starting whereof Resolution 38 onwards, instead they are justifying by quoting subsequent resolutions.

1. The plebiscite 'requirement' was an Indian requirement while signing the Instrument of Accession. It was Indian condition for acceptance of the same.

2. If they question the legality of Instrument of Accession, they do so at peril of question of their own locus standii as the instrument was in compliance with the Act under which all such instruments were to be entered into and also the same gave the legal basis for Pakistan. So we can start now questioning Pakistan itself and give immense pleasure to nut jobs of 'akhand bharat'.

3. If, on basis of point 1 above, say that plebiscite was a mandatory requirement, then ask for the details of plebiscite on their side when the Principalities in Gilgit-Baltistan acceded to them as also the plebiscite when over the objections of Mir of Hunza they simply handed over Shasgam Valley and today instead lie claiming gain of territory.

4. And if he points to volte-face by India on issue of plebiscite please post him the history of accession of Baluchistan, wherein the Principality of Kalat was to remain as an independent autonomic principality somewhat akin to J&K in terms of settlement between the Khan of Kalat and Pakistani Dominion. However, MA Jinnah had a change of heart and the same was subsequently absorbed into Pakistan (and a minor scirmish to oppose it took place between a lashkar led by Khan's younger brother and PA in the aftermath).



How about considerable time in Kashmir valley in streets of Srinagar, Baramulla, Lolab, Bandipore etc? Does it hold any value?

When a Pakistani sitting on a computer, tells me that the issue in Kashmir valley is - that it wants to join Pakistan, that is where your above statement comes in.

I am never in denial ..(which denial by the ways? Can you elaborate?) but when you post facts as they stand and not your perception/appreciation of it from your point of view.

I am only discussing the historical mistakes on all sides. The biggest mistake was the Kashmiris themselves. They kept changing their stance from independence-accession to India-accession to Pakistan-independence. When such a stand exists, they were doomed to failure as is evident today.

I was trying to move to present day situation and how one can resolve it after clearing up the past and laying facts as they stood. Asked people to contribute minus the nationalism. But can anyone avoid it? So when I laugh at Pakistani members and scoff their ill informed posts, you get to tag me as a nationalist. Yes that I am and am sure you are also, indeed as it should be. But, my dear sir, when I say the Accession is legal, it is on the basis of logic of Indian Instrument of Accession and conditions as described in Para 3 subclause a. Whereas my Pakistani friends get stuck on mere rants and one liners of illegality. Also they fail to explain the said illegality while being validated by the aforementioned Act not being extended to Pakistan itself, whose own legality and that of its territories is legalized under the same clause?

Am surprised that I come out as nationalist, have been called not so perfect Indian a few days back. Post your rebuttals in a chronological manner with overall picture and not segmental and specific arbitrary portions of the issue.
Click to expand...
Long story short
you are arguing in this matter based on legal ground to support Indian position
I'm arguing based on humanitarian ground which supports Pakistani position.
But the latter has precedence over the former and that's what you people fail to understand.

P.S: call me lazy but I like to be as precise as I can.
 
ssethii said:
Long story short
you are arguing in this matter based on legal ground to support Indian position
I'm arguing based on humanitarian ground which supports Pakistani position.
But the latter has precedence over the former and that's what you people fail to understand.

P.S: call me lazy but I like to be as precise as I can.
Click to expand...

In short - the Kashmiri continues to suffer.

Fair enough
 

Similar threads

M
Indian occupied Kashmiri citizens celebrate Pakistan Independence Day
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
89
Views
5K
Moonaman.Varavayi
M
Crimson Blue
Husain Haqqani Lobbies for Nawaz Sharif's 'Hope' to India.
2
Replies
23
Views
872
mangochutney
M
Bilal9
Bangladesh Emerges as Potential Market for Kashmiri Apples
Replies
6
Views
475
saif
S
HAIDER
India arms Hindu militias to combat Kashmiri fighters
Replies
2
Views
513
NagaBaba
NagaBaba
N
Normalizing ties with India
2 3
Replies
43
Views
2K
ProudThamizhan
P

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom