What's new

India shelves plan to expand French submarine order after Scorpene data breach

Indrajit

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 25, 2016
Messages
543
Reaction score
-1
Country
India
Location
India
A navy officer said there had been a serious breach of data and the navy's efforts were focused on determining the damage done to the existing submarines.
defaultauthor-img.gif

Reuters | Posted by Bijaya Kumar Das
New Delhi, September 3, 2016 | UPDATED 05:27 IST

India is unlikely to give French naval contractor DCNS a proposed order for three new submarines, in addition to the six it is already building in the country, following the leak of secret data about its capabilities, Indian defence officials said.

Details of the Scorpene submarine were published in the Australian newspaper last month, triggering concerns that it had become vulnerable even before it was ready to enter service.

DCNS had offered to build three more submarines to help India replace its ageing Soviet-era fleet, and had held talks over the past year, sources said.

SERIOUS BREACH OF DATA

That offer will not now be taken up, according to the officials.

"We had an agreement for six, and six it will remain," a defence ministry official briefed on the navy's plans told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity.

A navy officer said there had been a serious breach of data and the navy's efforts were focused on determining the damage done to the existing submarines.

"No order will be signed, nothing is going to happen now," the officer, who is also been briefed on the submarine data leak, said when asked if the government planned to enlarge the order.

DCNS spokesman Emmanuel Gaudez said the company was "stunned" by the information. "The talks are ongoing with the government and our Indian partners. We have not been informed in anyway of such a decision," he said.

GOVT WRITES TO DCNS

India's defence ministry has written to DCNS asking for details about the extent of the leak and how data relating to the Scorpene's intelligence gathering frequencies, diving depth, endurance and weapons specifications had ended up in the public domain, both officials said.

A naval group headed by a three-star admiral is looking at altering some features of the submarine, the first of which began sea trials in May for induction later this year, to minimise any damage.

The remaining five are in various stages of production at state-run Mazgaon Docks shipyard in Mumbai and they were all due to enter service by 2020.

INVESTIGATION

An official at Mazgaon Docks said the firm was focused on completing the original order of six Scorpenes and that he was not aware of any plan to build more.

A DCNS spokesman had earlier said the firm was in close touch with "our key customers like India to keep them informed of the development of our investigation, respond to their questions and mitigate their legitimate worries".

"The investigation is still ongoing and one of its objectives is to determine the potential prejudice and minimize its potential consequences," the spokesman said.

DCNS is preparing to build a new fleet of submarines in Australia for A$50 billion ($38.13 billion). Australian defence officials have warned the firm to beef up security in the wake of the leak.

DCNS has said that the leak, which covered details of the Scorpene-class model and not the vessel currently being designed for the Australian fleet, bore the hallmarks of "economic warfare" carried out by frustrated competitors.

Indian officials have pointed to a "non-disclosure of information" clause that was written into the 2005 contract at French insistence, the first defence ministry official briefed on the communication with the DCNS, said.

But the official said the government could only invoke that clause if it was established that the data was leaked and not stolen.

A French government source has said the firm had apparently been robbed, and it was not a leak, adding it was unlikely classified data was stolen.

NOISE SIGNATURE

Indian submarine experts say that, while the breach in information security was serious, it does not make the Scorpenes immediately vulnerable to detection.

The most vital data about a submarine is its unique "signature" of noise, heat and electro-magnetic emissions, and it is the combination of such signatures that determines the ability to detect them.

"If that is gone, then you might as well say goodbye to the submarine. You are exposed," said former vice admiral and submariner A K Singh.

Such signatures are assembled in the course of the sea trials of a submarine, and in the case of the Scorpenes that has yet to happen, he said.

India's submarine arm is down to 13 vessels, only half of which are operational at any time, and is falling rapidly behind China, which is expanding its maritime presence in the Indian Ocean.

Even Pakistan, which operates Agosta submarines also built by DCNS and is in talks with China for a new set of submarines, is drawing close to the operational strength of the Indian navy.

DCNS EXPRESSES INTEREST IN NEW PROJECT

The Indian government has approved the acquisition of the next generation of submarines beyond the Scorpene, in an project estimated at $8 billion.

DCNS has expressed an interest in that project, as has Russia and Germany's ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems.

The first defence official said he did not expect any movement on that project until the investigation into the Scorpene leak was completed and new security measures put in place

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...rder-after-scorpene-data-breach/1/755784.html
 
Let's keep it straight , if we are good with 6 Scorpenes, we will be good with 12. But if there is a problem , do not cancel the follow on , cancel all 6. Maybe arrange for the Scorpene built to be transported back to DCNS ? It should be straight , if there is a problem , DCNS should be kept away , but if we are willing to use the first 6 , rest all will also be very fine , if not then withdraw the P75I RFI from DCNS. Simple.
 
India has the technology, expertise and technical know-how to build a nuclear submarine. Couldn't they use that expertise to design and build an SSK indigenously for the P75I instead of going for a foreign sub
 
India has the technology, expertise and technical know-how to build a nuclear submarine. Couldn't they use that expertise to design and build an SSK indigenously for the P75I instead of going for a foreign sub

Might end up going that way, might be cheaper too. May not be as stealthy but may be the more rational choice in the long run.
 
Let's keep it straight , if we are good with 6 Scorpenes, we will be good with 12. But if there is a problem , do not cancel the follow on , cancel all 6. Maybe arrange for the Scorpene built to be transported back to DCNS ? It should be straight , if there is a problem , DCNS should be kept away , but if we are willing to use the first 6 , rest all will also be very fine , if not then withdraw the P75I RFI from DCNS. Simple.


Don't worry bro, even if there is a big leak, I expect DCNS to make good with Indian Navy by upgrading Scorpenes like replacing current fins with Barracuda fins. Expecting DCNS to fight real hard to keep Indians happy. Time to milk em.
 
The pace at which these scorpene submarines are produced it will be 2025 before order of these 6 submarines are complete. By then India will be making its own submarines.
 
Might end up going that way, might be cheaper too. May not be as stealthy but may be the more rational choice in the long run.
We could always use some help from Russians or Israelis when it comes to stealth. We even started building the Scorpenes, so probably we could use that knowledge and expertise as well.
 
Last edited:
Gentlemen

Any Leak of Data of this level must have some cannivance from DCNS as well.
I See it as a Sales --------Gimmick-----

Also, this is a Tool to Hold French-Balls to reduce Exorbitant Rate on Rafale..

Frenchies want to create a Bigger Market for their AIPs (6+3)
The Game is Simple --I buy your Leaking Stuff & You reduce Price of your Birds
 
Last edited:
@Abingdonboy @PARIKRAMA




French sources say talks are still on for another batch of submarines....

View attachment 330932

The internal plan of Indian navy for 2030 clearly states that IN will have a fleet of 30 SSKs out of which 24 will be outright modern submarines.

The line mix planned was initially
P 75- 6 subs
P 75I - 6 Subs
Indigenous SSK - 12 subs.

Below are few excerpts from Indian Navy dox. :wave:

upload_2016-9-3_14-12-6.png


looking at the present status of P75I and Indigenous SSK design being not finalised, the proposal has changed to

P75 - 6+3+3 ~ 9-12
P75I - 6+3+3~ 6-12
indigenous SSK - 3+3+3+3~ 3-6~9-12

The reasoning for 10-12 submarine order point is below

upload_2016-9-3_14-18-13.png



upload_2016-9-3_14-20-1.png

Some serious points
  • There are serious question raised recently in April 2016 when all this talk started going very serious.
  • First thing, the indigenous designed SSK needs to be in one of the two lines made for submarines in India.
  • As of now only MDL has two lines available out of which second assembling line has parallel capacity to produce 5 submarines all at once.
  • There is no other public or private sector which has been identified as of now by MOD/GOI whom it has indicated to go for such a technology absorption as no new tender and order has been given till date
  • This is the tale tell sign of SSK not matured enough for an urgent need for a new line space nor P75I being close to tender process.
Now why more scorpenes (form the same IN dox)

  • Scorpene submarine is constructed by joining five sections.
  • The construction process starts with the fabrication of ring frames, followed by plate forming.
  • Further, they are assembled into sub sections which in turn form the 5 major sections of the submarine.
  • While the sections are being manufactured, a parallel activity of outfitting of cradles with equipment is progressed.
  • Thereafter, the cradles are shipped inside the sections.
  • Further, the sections are lowered onto the submarine launch pontoon in dry dock followed by the boot together which is the joining of the last two sections completing the submarine construction.
  • A schematic representation of the same and photographs of cardinal activities are given below
upload_2016-9-3_14-23-38.png


upload_2016-9-3_14-26-5.png

upload_2016-9-3_14-26-25.png


  • On completion of the above process of construction, the submarine is launched and undergoes STW inspections, harbour trials of various systems, followed by sea trials.
  • On an average, it takes about 6 years (pie chart highlighting the duration placed below) for the whole process to complete which justifies the present status of the Project 75 where the first submarine is under preparation for sea trials.
  • The second submarine is fully integrated and is undergoing preparation for launch.
  • The remaining 4 submarines are at various stages of structural outfitting
Now what we learned and i quote
  • MDL and Naval personnel have gained tremendous knowledge and expertise in the various stringent standards applicable for welding processes, geometrical measurements, welding inspection including NDT (non destructive testing) procedures and acceptance/rejection criteria.
  • Extensive welder qualification in Major Metal Arc Welding processes to build pressure hull structures was also undertaken during the course of the project which added to the technical skills of the MDL workforce.
  • Another important aspect which facilitated training of personnel in the private sector industries was during the outsourcing of a variety of jobs related to submarine construction.
  • We have better command now to critically use the technologies and develop superior construction philosophy to suit our shipyards and manpower.
  • Some of the critical items where significant progress in indigenization has been made are the weld consumables, ventilation coamings, RO plant, cables, anechoic tiles, GRP casing panels, main batteries etc.
  • Certain equipment like thrust block, hydraulic blocks, hydraulic plungers for hydroplanes etc the equipment was imported from OEMs in raw form but was machined in India through identified companies.
  • During the course of the indigenization process, it was also observed that some of the imported material which were procured from foreign firms could be sourced with ease from within India.
  • In this phase of indigenization experience, we were able to analyze the entire plethora of material required for submarine construction and conclude that setting up production facilities for certain material may not be cost beneficial.
  • For example, indigenization of steel. The quantum of infrastructure and research development required for producing a specific micro alloy steel like HLES 80 used for scorpenes is going to be phenomenal considering the fact that an entire facility needs to be set up for manufacture of a specific grade of steel.
Thus, these are some of the simple points which i can publicly quote here. The pros outweighs the cons..

I pasted a figure in the scorpene leak thread
pic1-png.330068

https://defence.pk/threads/sensitive-data-of-indian-navy’s-scorpene-class-submarines-leaked.445677/page-46#post-8631675

If you look closely you will understand what its showing and why IN is clear about their plan and what they are trying to do.

@Abingdonboy @anant_s @Nilgiri @Vergennes @MilSpec @nair @SpArK @BON PLAN @Ankit Kumar 002 @GuardianRED
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom