What's new

INDIA’S “COLD START WAR DOCTRINE” REVISITED

Adux

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
3,856
Reaction score
0
Paper no. 2293
10.07.2007

INDIA’S “COLD START WAR DOCTRINE” REVISITED

By Dr. Subhash Kapila

Introductory Observations

India’s Cold Start War Doctrine was unveiled at the Army Commanders Conference on April 28, 2004. It was a radical departure to publicly assert the enunciation of a new war doctrine. This new war doctrine was necessitated by the military lessons learnt from the Kargil War and India’s war mobilization during OPERATION PARAKARAM following the attack on India’s Parliament House by Pakistan based terrorists.


India’s Cold Start War Doctrine was also necessitated by the need to operationalize Indian Army’s war fighting in a NBC (Nuclear, Biological and Chemical) warfare environment. Indian Army had also to arrive at a new war doctrine to incorporate technological advances in the fields of C4 I2 (A military composite term encompassing command, control communications, computers, intelligence and information technology).

Obviously, full details of the Cold Start War Doctrine could not be released in the public domain. However, this author in a near accurate visualization of the Cold Start War Doctrine discussed the various parameters of this doctrine in two papers on SAAG website as per the following details:

India’s New “Cold Start” War Doctrine Strategically Reviewed (Paper No. 991 dated 04.05.2004)
Indian Army’s New “Cold Start” War Doctrine Strategically Reviewed – Part II (Additional Imperatives) (Paper No. 1013 dated 01.06.2004)
These two papers were thereafter reproduced on a number of defense-related websites in India and Pakistan and then followed an intense debate on these websites.

That India’s Cold Start War Doctrine has stimulated an international interest can be gauged from the fact that in the United Kingdom, one of the leading universities in a detailed paper reviewed this Doctrine in April 2007.

Three years down the line, it becomes necessary to revisit India’s Cold Start War Doctrine and review what progress the Indian Army has made in this direction. For this purpose, this paper shall include a discussion on the following aspects:

COLD START WAR DOCTRINE: Major Conceptual Underpinnings
Indian Army’s Revalidation of COLD START WAR DOCTRINE
India’s Political Leadership Still Flawed in its Strategic Approaches
Indian Political Decision – Making in Defense Acquisitions Limits COLD START WAR DOCTRINE
India’s Nuclear Command & Control: Effective Set-up Essential for New Doctrine
COLD START WAR DOCTRINE: Overall Assessment
COLD START WAR DOCTRINE: Major Conceptual Underpinnings

Selected excerpts from the author’s earlier papers need re-emphasis to provide a backdrop for the present discussion: These are as follows:

India now plans and is ready to act offensively against Pakistan for any perceived acts of strategic de-stabilization of India, proxy war and terrorism
India has in declaratory terms enunciated it will undertake offensive operations against Pakistan, short of the nuclear threshold.
India could initiate offensive operations either as pre-emptive strikes or initiate offensive operations straight away without giving Pakistan, the time to bring diplomatic leverages in play.
Indian Army’s combat potential will be fully harnessed for offensive operations at the outset by eliminating the differentiation between “defensive formations” and “offensive formations”.
Implicit in this Doctrine is that the Indian Army will no longer concentrate on capturing and holding Pakistani territory as leverage for post-war negotiations but the new operational will aim at destroying the combat potential of the Pakistan Army and its war-fighting capacity
The above is to be achieved by fast moving armored and mechanized operations supported by preponderant artillery fire power and even more preponderant combat fire-power of the Indian Air Force.
Logically the factors that came into play and which were discussed in the first paper were: (1) The Indian Political Parameters That Need to Come Into Play (2) India’s National Military Directives Need Change (3) India’s Strategic Military Objectives Need to be Made Clear (4) The Imperatives of Dedicated Indian Air Force Close Support and Dedicated Ground Attack Squadrons (5) Indian Navy Aviation Support for Battle Groups (6) India Will Have to Use Conventional SRBMs and Cruise Missiles and (7) Special Forces and Air Assault Capabilities Need Expansion.

The “Additional Imperatives” spelt out by the author in the second paper were (1) Higher Commanders Mental Robustness and Military Audacity (2) Up-gradation of C4 I2 Systems (3) Indian Air Force: Reorientation in Concept of Operations (4) Air Defense Networks and Systems (5) Integration With Nuclear Warfare Plans (6) Electronic Warfare Capabilities Enhancement and (7) Accelerated Development of India’s ICBMs and SLBMs.

The above factors which were dwelt upon in fair detail would give a good idea of what all is involved to make this Doctrine a success.

Indian Army’s Revalidation of COLD START WAR DOCTRINE

In the relentless pursuit of its traditional high standards of military professionalism, the Indian Army has been involved in a continuous process of revalidation of the operational concepts and techniques of the new Doctrine.

The following major exercises have been conducted so far:

Name of Exercise Year

Divya Shakti 2005

Vajra Shakti 2005

Desert Strike 2005

Sanghe Shakti 2006

Ashwa Medh 2007

All the formations at Corps and Divisional levels that would be required to execute the new doctrine stand tested and the new doctrinal concepts revalidated both in the “plains terrain” and in “desert terrain”. It is a continuous process underway involving rapidly changing scenarios.

These were large scale exercises involving at any one time military strengths from 30,000 to 50,000. The Indian Air Force was also employed in all these exercises in joint operations arising from the new Doctrine. A separate exercise of combined arms along with the Indian Navy was also conducted.

At other levels, net-centric warfare, electronic warfare, digital warfare, Special Forces operations in round the clock time frame over five to seven days were exercised to test both professional skills and endurance.

It can be confidently stated that the Indian Army, the Indian Air Force and the Indian Navy stand fully exercised and the new Doctrine stands re-validated at all levels.

Limitations if any in putting into effect this doctrine lays elsewhere and not with the Armed Forces as we will see below.

India’s Political Leadership Still Flawed in its Strategic Approaches

The author in the first paper on this subject spelt out that this new War Doctrine can only be successful if the following political parameters are met (1) Political will to use offensive military power (2) Political will to use pre-emptive military strategies (3) Political sagacity to view strategic military objectives with clarity (4) Political determination to pursue military operations to their ultimate conclusion without succumbing to external pressures (5) Political determination to cross nuclear threshold if Pakistan seems so inclined.

During OP PARAKARAM, the BJP Government faltered in not carrying its “coercion objectives” to their ultimate conclusion due to one or a combination of the above factors.

In the last three years the Congress Government through the pronouncements of its Prime Minister and their attitudinal reflections indicate that India would be found seriously wanting in “political will” to initiate or execute the COLD START WAR DOCTRINE.

The Congress Government’s appeasement approaches to Pakistan under external pressures and those of its captive minority vote-banks do not generate confidence about its strategic approaches and “political will to use power”. The Government’s weak-kneed political approaches to counter-terrorism indicate its lack of political will to use power to defend India’s national security interests.

In the 60th year of India’s independence, the political leadership of this country is still found wanting in “strategic vision” and “strategic mindsets”.

For more elaboration, readers could refer to the author’s book “India’s Defence Policies and Strategic Thought: A Comparative Analysis”.

Indian Political Decision Making in Defense Acquisitions Limits COLD START WAR DOCTRINE

India’s COLD START WAR DOCTRINE woven around the operational concept of offensive operations at the very outset of hostilities cannot proceed towards success on Indian Army undertaking military operations with incomplete military inventories in terms of weapons, equipment and logistics.

This has been one of the starkest reasons of failure of United States Forces in Iraq and should be a military lesson well taken.

India’s defense equipment acquisition process despite recent innovations still impedes the speedy acquiring of the wherewithal for the Indian Armed Forces neglecting the vital imperative of this Doctrine of full military inventories at all times.

It arises from the politicization of the defense equipment acquisition process and bureaucratic lethargy. When this Government came into power, the then Defense Minister’s first statement was that all defense deals of the previous government would be probed. The reasons were political. What has been the result?

The Indian Air Force today is critically short of 136 combat fighter aircraft. This deficiency is likely to persist till 2010 and beyond as the initial 18 aircraft of any now deal will come only by 2010. The remainder may stretch till 2020. Further, the Indian Air Force Chief presumably under political directions, has recently stated that the orders would go to a single vendor. This would add to the delays.

Indian Army’s artillery is short of over 400 guns of 155mm caliber. Despite trials in 2002, 2004 and 2006, fresh tenders have now again been initiated. One cannot expect this deficiency to be made before 2012 or so.

The COLD START WAR DOCTRINE has been built around the use of preponderant fine-power of the Army’s own artillery guns and massive use of Indian Air Force combat fire-power for speedy operations and quick military decisive results.

As on today the Indian Army stands deprived critically of both the instruments of firepower essential for the success of the new War Doctrine. Surely, national security imperatives should not be sacrificed at the alter of bureaucratism and the political leadership should be bold in removing such hurdles when it comes to upholding the imperatives of national security.

So what do we do? Pend COLD START WAR DOCTRINE till 2010 and beyond or await India’s political leadership awakening to the need for coming out with “off the shelf” acquisitions to remedy the critical shortages which have a debilitating effect on the new Doctrine?

India’s Nuclear Command & Control: Effective Set-up Essential for New Doctrine

It is conceded that the details of India’s Nuclear Command and Control Set-up cannot be released in the public domain. But what cannot be conceded is that the organizational links also have to be kept in wraps. Today, there exist a haziness and ambiguity about the organizational structure of the Nuclear Command and Control Set-up. This does not add to the credibility of India's nuclear deterrence.

Speculation abounds: (1) About the missing links in the operationalizing of a nuclear strike once a political decision has been taken. (2) Has the military been integrated into the nuclear decision-making structure (3) Would the Indian Army be assured that within hours of COLD START WAR DOCTRINE operations being unleashed and Pakistan indulging in a First Strike, the Indian Army formations would not be rendered powerless by the inevitable delays in the political decision making on a nuclear counter-strike?

India’s Prime Minister and the Defense Minister need to be more forthcoming in declarations on the above aspects. India’s Draft Nuclear Doctrine announced eight years back needs to be formalized. It must also integrate the aspects of the COLD START WAR DOCTRINE operationalizing under NBC conditions and India’s responses thereto.

COLD START WAR DOCTRINE: Overall Assessment

The overall assessment on the effective execution and operationalising success of Indian Army’s COLD START WAR DOCTRINE has to be viewed at two levels as under:

Indian Army: Has it been successful in training its subordinate formations and higher commanders as per the new War Doctrine and has it re-validated the operational concepts arrived at?
India’s Political Leadership: Does it have the strategic vision and the strategic mindset of having the will to use power to secure India’s national security aims?
The answer to the first question is a resounding “Yes”. Since 2004 the Indian Army has worked hard to revalidate the new WAR DOCTRINE’s operational concepts and fine-tuning these every year and in every type of terrain. The high standards of military professionalism and innovation induces confidence in the Indian Armed Forces. It is this which prompts advanced countries to seek joint military exercises with India.

Unfortunately, while broad details of the Army’s exercises appear in the public domain, what does not emerge are the other stark realities, that is: (1) How are the Army’s current military inventory shortages impacting on the new War Doctrine (2) How is the shortage of 136 combat aircraft in the Indian Air Force will affect the success of the New War Doctrine in the short term? (3) How does the new Doctrine caters for delays and interruptions due to delays in political decision-making?

In terms of reorganizing the Indian Army’s Command and Control structure for implementing the new War Doctrine, some measures are already evident in the raising of the new South-West Command and 9 Corps. Similarly, plans are afoot to raise a Special Forces Command.

However, when one comes to the second aspect, in terms of objective analysis, the answer is negative. In terms of demonstrated performance in crisis management, counter-terrorism responses, policy approaches towards Pakistan and China and the necessity of firm declaratory policies on national security issues, the present Government does not induce confidence that it has the requisite strategic vision and strategic mindset.

Concluding Observations

The Indian Army in joint operations with the Indian Air Force and Indian Navy stand trained and poised for successful execution of the COLD START WAR DOCTRINE in any ‘Hot War Scenario’.

The country fervently hopes that India’s political leadership of any political dispensation in power, does not develop “Cold Feet” when faced with the decision to execute the new War Doctrine in pursuance of India’s National Security Objectives.

(The author is an International Relations and Strategic Affairs analyst. He is the Consultant, Strategic Affairs with South Asia Analysis Group. Email:drsubhashkapila@yahoo.com)


Good topic to discuss :coffee:
 
.
Indeed, the answer: Vote BJP, they will get those required equipments for our armed forces! Congress tries to be too politically correct.
 
.
Noo!!! Congress my friggin party doesnt have the balls, as many men have said the only indian politican with balls was Indira Gandhi
 
.
That is exactly my point, i just did not want to use the words you used.

Congress just doesnt have the balls, BJP does, i think its better to vote with what you percieve is more important at this point.
 
.
I am not a fan of BJP, I would still vote congress(family pressure..lol), wish there was alternative
 
.
No mate, that is NOT correct. If you think that Congress is better for the country, then vote for Congress, else NOT.

It does not matter, even if you know the candidate standing from Congress personally. Its just not right...These small things make a difference in life.
 
.
I dont agree with BJP's Hindutva stance at all, I can never vote for the BJP
 
. . .
And why is that Adux ? Do you think i am a hindutva type ? Do you assume that i believe in extremism ? Or is it that i am not in denial and say things straight up instead of trying to sugar coat every word ? Is it because i see fact as fact and fiction as fiction, and do not get into moral grandstanding ?

What made you think i would say that even before i did ?
 
.
Oh great!!! another tripe
unending diatribe!!!!!!!
Spare me 'son', Its easy to have a logical conclusion on people by their behavior patterns. I guessed your's. Simple I dont have a Political affinity finding 'bat' device with me. Kapish


PS: Dont talk about sugar coating words, I aint known here for that... With more 6000 points worth of negative reps....lol
 
.
Now if the newbie is done blasting his head!!! can we please get back to Cold Start
 
.
Ok i will not get into any arguments with you about my character. By the way, i did not attack you in anyway. Its you who made a one liner about my political inclination.
 
.
which turned out to be true!!!, This is an internet forum, attack me all you want..lol
 
.
I am interested in Offensive formations that have been newly created or transfered from defensive position to offensive position. Any new bases built? How much distance has been reduced, does it amount to troop build-up in near-border areas???? How is the IAF integerated here, is it just a tactical wing, or does it have much say in the decision making process? Cold-Start seems too much Army oriented, while I believe Airforce can do a much better job as well as safer job
 
.
Back
Top Bottom