India reduces citizenship fee for Hindus, minorities from Pakistan

[schoolboy]

On topic - I believe this is a foolish move by the Indian government and it's just a matter of time before it is struck down by the judiciary on constitutional grounds - and rightfully so IMO

First off, there is no such thing as 'Hindu civilization'. Hinduism as a religion once stretched from Afghanistan to Indonesia; that does not make them 'once apart of the Indian civilization'. A Punjabi/Sindhi would have more in common with Kashmiris, Pashtuns and Baloch than with Indians.

There are religions, there are kingdoms (political) and there are ethnic groups. The trouble with asking for a black-and-white history is that these often overlap and the existence of some distinctions (usually religious) blind us to others (usually ethnic).

The subcontinent except south India has generally been a common ethnic group [with the occasional infusion of invading armies]. The region has typically been congruent with the dharmic religions. Even with regime changes populations remain largely similar - though the ruling class might see some changes. After the advent of Islam many populations converted but ethnic and political brackets remained unchanged (Aurangzeb's empire, Ashoka's empire and British India were largely the same).

From a historical and anthropological perspective - and there's a great thread on PDF somewhere that posts the findings of some genetic studies across populations in India and Pakistan - modern the people of India and Pakistan have more similarities with one another than with other ethnic groups - such as the Persians, Burmese, Chinese and Central Asians. The present day religous divide does not preclude these similarities.

 

[lastofthepatriots]

They can all go to India. We don't want them.

 

[Hindustani78]

Ministry of Home Affairs
21-March, 2017 16:43 IST
Resettlement fund for Hindu Refugees

The Government of India, on 22nd December 2016, has sanctioned a package of Rs. 2000 Crore for providing financial assistance of Rs. 5.5 Lakh per family to 36,384 displaced family of Pakistan Occupied Jammu and Kashmir are – POJK (1947) and Chhamb (1965 and 1971), living in Jammu and Kashmir.

The State Government of Jammu and Kashmir has been requested to provide requisite details of all beneficiaries so that the amount of financial assistance could be transferred directly into the beneficiaries’ account to enable this Ministry to start disbursing the amount. The State Government has already started the work to collect requisite details and documents in this respect and has received forms from 3,135 eligible beneficiaries till 16th March 2017.

This was stated by the Minister of State for Home Affairs, Shri Hansraj Gangaram Ahir in a written reply to question by Shri Harish Meena in the Lok Sabha today.

****

 

[Hindustani78]

New Delhi , September 10, 2017 10:26 IST
Updated: September 10, 2017 10:26 IST

http://www.thehindu.com/news/nation...c-challenging-article-35a/article19654832.ece

Some refugees of West Pakistan, who had migrated to India during the 1947 partition, have moved the Supreme Court challenging Article 35A of the Constitution relating to special rights and privileges of permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir.

The petition said there were around 3 lakh refugees from West Pakistan but those settled in Jammu and Kashmir have been denied the rights gauranteed under Article 35A which are given to the original residents of the state.

A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud tagged the plea of the refugees, who are settled in the Kathua district of Jammu and Kashmir, with the similar matters pending before it.

The apex court had, on the request of Jammu and Kashmir government, posted the matters challenging Article 35A for hearing after Diwali holidays.

Article 35A, which was added to the Constitution by a Presidenial Order in 1954, accords special rights and privileges to citizens of Jammu and Kashmir.

It also empowers the state’s legislature to frame any law without attracting a challenge on grounds of violating the Right to Equality of people from other states or any other right under the Indian Constitution.

Earlier, a Kashmiri Pandit woman, Dr. Charu Wali Khanna, had approached the apex court challenging the provision.

Petitioners Kali Das, his son Sanjay Kumar and one other in their plea have said that they were raising issues seeking conferment of basic natural and human rights which at present were denied to them.

“The petitioners are persons who migrated from Pakistan to India in 1947. They were assured by the government that they should stay in the state of Jammu and Kashmir on the assurance that they would be granted Permanent Resident Certificates (PRC), which would permit them to purchase properties and own a house, opportunity to get a government job and reservation benefits, since most of them belong to SC/ST/OBC category and a right to vote in state and municipal elections,” the plea said.

The petition claimed that since 1947, the refugees have been given repeated assurances by successive governments but never given PRC, thereby keeping them as refugees for over 65 years.

“Petitioners are filing the instant writ petition for conferring the status of permanent resident on around 3,00,000 West Pakistan refugees, who have been denied basic rights like the right to employment, education, ownership of property and political participation,” the petition said.

It said denial of any of these necessary, natural and basic human rights result in “denial of basic civilisational recognition to a set of humanity which defies basic human values and civilsational ethos”.

“Certain group of citizens of India for whose rights this petition is being moved are subjected to extreme cruelty and bonded labour treatment. The state government granted permanent resident status to some of the West Pakistan refugees subject to exception that they could be employed only as sweepers,” the petition submitted.

The plea claimed that the refugees and their children are not allowed to hold any position higher than sweeper and the children are not entitled to gain education in government universities or avail any scholarship to gain education.

“Theoretically, employment of these people is permissible and their appearances in All India Services in UPSC is permissible, where they can become chief secretary of J&K, the DGP of J&K but cannot hold any position higher than a sweeper, like a clerk or a constable in the state,” it submitted.

The plea said if a person is permitted to occupy the position of Chief Secretary or DGP of the state in law, no logical or legal impediments remains for him to occupy the post of a clerk or a constable.