India planning nuclear first strikes against Pakistan (New York Times)

[cocomo]

US is trying to impose this shit filled country as a regional hegemon on South Asia. It will never happen.

 

[Mangus Ortus Novem]

US is trying to impose this shit filled country as a regional hegemon on South Asia. It will never happen.

Those days are long gone now. Pak has made war by the indians impossible.

All that will be waged will be proxy indian terror wars and grandstanding in the media. All these first strikes or surgical strikes will be happening in media space. Only!

The end game is Reunited Kashmir, Reunited South Tibet and liberated NE states.

 

[Bhupendra Singh_Cyan]

And you are a fake Singh

Lol who said? I'm a rajput nigga.

 

[Fledgingwings]

its gonna be accidental fire...ending up where it started

 

[asad71]

We don't know how much damage will done to Pakistan during nuclear standoff , but for sure,China will swallow down a huge chunk of India. Because India is not capable enough to counter two front at time. Anyway there is no chance of nuclear war in this region , but there are chances of limited conventional war. Proxy war still in progress, which India initiated in 71. And Bangladesh won't miss the opportunity of taking over Assam and China will help out Bangladesh .

Yes, we are waiting for an opportunity to advance up to the Rajmahal Hills and retrieve what we lost at Palassy, 23 June 1757.

 

[My-Analogous]

Mughal rules is not same as Muslim rules. Those Muslims Rulers have nothing to do with modern day Pakistani. Listen to Hassan Nisar sometimes and understand our history in this region.

We don't pay much attention to Indian paid staffs ever but please don't stop his pay after all he have to run his family

 

[maximuswarrior]

New York Times..

Why? Don't you Indians worship anything American? What happened here? You Indians even adopt American names.

India has strategic depth to save more people or survive but not for Pakistan...

LOL What are you waiting for since you have already won? Why don't you carry out a nuclear strike and get some sleep after that? What could possibly go wrong for India? You'll survive, right? Why just talk and no action?

 

[danger007]

Why? Don't you Indians worship anything American? What happened here? You Indians even adopt American names.



LOL What are you waiting for since you have already won? Why don't you carry out a nuclear strike and get some sleep after that? What could possibly go wrong for India? You'll survive, right? Why just talk and no action?

haha that's your feel...

 

[abrar khan]

Damn man ;
For the first time I was serious in my historical life and you screwd it.
what facts are you upto and plz show me the difference in the strategy for pakistan and china from indian policy makers.
Scenario in Pakistan

Pakistan has not officially enunciated its nuclear doctrine. It justifies its entire nuclear weapons programme as being an equaliser to balance Indian conventional military superiority. More importantly, it constantly uses nuclear blackmail by threatening to use nuclear weapons, if India responds to cross-border terrorist attacks by military action on its soil.

The sad reality is that substantial sections of our so-called ”intellectual” and ‘liberal” elite run scared and panic, at such Pakistani tantrums. Pakistan’s Generals live too comfortably to commit collective suicide. Moreover, one has to rationally analyse what needs to be done to deal with Pakistani nuclear bluff, bluster and blackmail. One hopes some reality has dawned on this “elite” after the recent surgical strikes across the Line of Control. Pakistan should not be allowed to get the impression that this was a one-time occurrence.

While Pakistan has not formally enunciated a nuclear doctrine, Lt. General Khalid Kidwai, the Head of Pakistan’s Strategic Planning Division of its National Command Authority, told a team of physicists from Italy’s Landon Network that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons were “aimed solely at India”. According to the report of the Landon team, Kidwai added that Pakistan would use nuclear weapons if India conquers a large part of Pakistan’s territory, or destroys a large part of Pakistan’s land and air forces. Kidwai also held out the possibility of use of nuclear weapons if India tries to “economically strangle” Pakistan, or pushes it to political destabilisation.

Lt. General Kidwai, who is highly regarded internationally, enunciated these views over a decade ago, when he was Head of the Pakistan’s Strategic Forces Command. He has since retired. But anyone who understands the strategic thinking of the Pakistan army, realises that the “Red Lines”, enunciated by Kidwai, especially in regard to the fallout of an Indian attack, would remain the basic parameters of current strategic thinking.

Chinese influence
There is, however, one significant difference in Pakistan’s capabilities since then. Thanks to Chinese assistance, Pakistan has now built plutonium reactors and reprocessing facilities in the Fatehjang-Khushab Plutonium complex, enabling it to assemble an arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons and miniaturised Plutonium warheads. But, in practical terms, Pakistan cannot use these tactical nuclear weapons in the Punjab area, which is densely populated. They can perhaps be used in the Sind/Rajasthan desert, with Pakistan presuming that such an attack will not prompt India to resort to a full-scale nuclear conflict as enunciated in India’s nuclear doctrine, as this would result in to mutual destruction.

Viewed in a global context, the entire theology of a nuclear “no first use”, which was enunciated by the Soviet Union during the Cold War and rejected by the US and its NATO allies, has few adherents today. The Russian Federation does not subscribe to a doctrine of “no first use” of nuclear weapons. The US and its NATO allies now aver that NATO members can use nuclear weapons against states armed with biological and chemical weapons, even if those States have signed the NPT.

China appears to have maintained a measure of ambiguity on whether its “no first use” pledge will be applicable to India. An unambiguous clarification on this issue has to be sought from China.
Read it and please be silent
Your's lovingly

Calm DOWN@all

don't put pressure on your brainless skull, I have clearly mentioned the difference between the policies of two countries in previous posts , go and read those you will get your answer,

 

[Hulk]

Indians don't have the nuts to conduct a real conventional strike so id say even contemplating about a nuclear strike against Pakistan is a bit far fetched. But being fond of the Indian mindset, we understand they like to dream big. Dreaming however, takes place while sleeping.

If they couldn't manage a strike against kahuta back in the 80s when we didn't even have a credible delivery medium, then they'd be outright crazy to imagine doing it now.

On the other hand considering the level of frustration amongst the Indian leadership these days maybe they've developed a suicidal tendency.

It's not about guts but common sense but you will not get it.

 

[maximuswarrior]

haha that's your feel...

LOL that is all you can come up with. Your words have no meaning nor any weight.

 

[SecularNationalist]

Separatists are doing this since 1990 or even before that. Why should we care. The real reason this is still happening is because of Article 370 which prevents rest of Indians to live in Kashmir. Once that is removed, Kashmir will be flooded by people from Hariyana, Punjab, Bihar, Rajasthan etc and these Kashmiri will stop being the deciders in Kashmir.

Thats just not going to happen every bharti will be kicked out from kashmir just like those pundits were kicked out. Kashmiris cant simply live with indians and cannot accept them on their land.you are deluded if you think you can use force to remove article 370 or by force you can settle biharis and punjabis in kashmir.

One person's freedom fighter is others terrorist. These folks pelt stones on our Army, they should be dealt accordingly.

They throw stones because your bharti army is raping their mums and sisters.A person is always a freedom fighter if he is oppressed and being violated by foreign invaders.It,s his right to fight back.

 

[footmarks]

Thats just not going to happen every bharti will be kicked out from kashmir just like those pundits were kicked out. Kashmiris cant simply live with indians and cannot accept them on their land.you are deluded if you think you can use force to remove article 370 or by force you can settle biharis and punjabis in kashmir.

That (the bold and underlined part) is the reason there is no "kashmiri independence struggle" in J & K. what we have is just a radicalization and IS like terrorist play in the garb of freedom struggle. Keep dreaming, Kashmir is not going anywhere, even if that means none left to live there. This is not a freedom struggle, when you kill and force to leave a part of the native population just because they do not share your religion.

 

[Ahmad Sajjad Paracha]

That (the bold and underlined part) is the reason there is no "kashmiri independence struggle" in J & K. what we have is just a radicalization and IS like terrorist play in the garb of freedom struggle. Keep dreaming, Kashmir is not going anywhere, even if that means none left to live there. This is not a freedom struggle, when you kill and force to leave a part of the native population just because they do not share your religion.

This shit does not make any sense

 

[footmarks]

This shit does not make any sense

But this shit is for real. Upper tracts of kashmir have become so radicalized that the protesters routinely display ISIS flags openly. Even Jammu and Leh regions are fed up now with this radicalization and endless bloodshed it leads to. They want to be separated from J & K as union territory of India.