What's new

India, Pakistan threatened to unleash missiles at each other: Sources

All the Pakistani bombs missed and did not cause any damage or casualties so no need to retaliate.

Anyways Pakistan's former CJCSC Ehsan Ul Haq himself said 2 weeks back in a TV talk show that larger the war between India and Pakistan expands more will Pakistan's disadvantage increase.
As an example he said in a skirmish in one sector of LoC both sides will be equal but if the war expands to all along international border after India opens multiple fronts, Pakistan will be at a severe disadvantage and will be forced to rely on nukes.

Missed? Have we not already given you VIDEO evidence of us intentionally disposing our arsenal away from your facility. Perhaps that video isn't as clear as your IAF evidence of AWAC images but it is evidence -_- Get a life kid
 
. . .
If India fired 6 missiles and Pakistan fired 18 in return, then India would have fired back 54 missiles and at that rate Pakistan would have run out of missiles far before India as number of missiles in Indian inventory is far higher.
Oh dear
Idiot do u count the pakistani missile inventory yourself?
 
.
If India fired 6 missiles and Pakistan fired 18 in return, then India would have fired back 54 missiles and at that rate Pakistan would have run out of missiles far before India as number of missiles in Indian inventory is far higher.
Are you sure?
Doubt it..
Also remeber the crying on one pilot...and 40 soldiers

We didnt cry like this after 70,000 were dead...i bet once the number hit 50 india would xome begging
 
. .
Thread should be:

"How a failed political stunt almost led to a major escalation with a serious threat of nuclear war."
 
. .
All the Pakistani bombs missed and did not cause any damage or casualties so no need to retaliate.

Anyways Pakistan's former CJCSC Ehsan Ul Haq himself said 2 weeks back in a TV talk show that larger the war between India and Pakistan expands more will Pakistan's disadvantage increase.
As an example he said in a skirmish in one sector of LoC both sides will be equal but if the war expands to all along international border after India opens multiple fronts, Pakistan will be at a severe disadvantage and will be forced to rely on nukes.
Are you feeling lucky?
 
.
At one stage, India threatened to fire at least 6 missiles at ****, and Islamabad said it would respond with its own missile strikes "3 times over", according to Western diplomats and govt sources
Though long gone, if Pakistan had this technology in 1971, East Pakistan wouldn't have been cut off. The retaliatory and counter strike capability that Pakistan possesses made the Indians freeze in their tracks.
 
.
Are you feeling lucky?


It was clear to anyone that Pakistan intentionally de-escalated. That has won Pakistan diplomatic victories across the world, and improved our moral stance on Kashmir as well. Returning Abhinandan was the correct course of action, we created divisions in India because the illusion of all evil Pakistan was vanquished.

It was clear to everyone that Pakistan sent a message. Pakistan is a responsible state, India is not.
 
.
Yes we know how long Pakistan can fight a full fledged war very well..:agree:
No you dont know but your Generals know and that is why they backed off in 2002 standoff, backed off after Mumbai drama and even backed off after PAF attacked your military installations and shot down your 2 Jets on 27th Feb.
Now tell me if your Generals and Modi were so confident that Pakistan cannot fight a full fledged war, then why your Army, Air Force and Navy never responded to Pakistan's actions on 27?
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom