India, Pakistan threatened to unleash missiles at each other: Sources

[Tejas Spokesman]

Listen fan boy, your weekend warriors can only kid you and make you look the ultimate fools.
here's prime example .

Old wreckage in display since 1977.

 

[Windjammer]

Old wreckage in display since 1977.

old wreckage of what. ???

 

[Max]

If Kashmir issue don't get resolved we may soon see exchange of missiles as well.

 

[I S I]

It do not work that way achmed.

Nor it works by asking bobs&vagene, pajeet.

 

[Arsalan 345]

If India fired 6 missiles and Pakistan fired 18 in return, then India would have fired back 54 missiles and at that rate Pakistan would have run out of missiles far before India as number of missiles in Indian inventory is far higher.

Who told you that number of missiles in Pakistan posses is lower than indian missiles? Lol

 

[xyxmt]

If India fired 6 missiles and Pakistan fired 18 in return, then India would have fired back 54 missiles and at that rate Pakistan would have run out of missiles far before India as number of missiles in Indian inventory is far higher.

India wont be able to fire back after Pakistan is done with her first missile strike, Now you must have realized that Pakistan has much better intelligence that India and 18 Pakistani target would be the one that would bring India to her knees, even Pakistani conventional bomb can create shock and Awe in India. stop fooling yourself anymore, you are not what you pretend to be and we are 3 times what you think we are.

 

[Jungibaaz]

All the Pakistani bombs missed and did not cause any damage or casualties so no need to retaliate.

Anyways Pakistan's former CJCSC Ehsan Ul Haq himself said 2 weeks back in a TV talk show that larger the war between India and Pakistan expands more will Pakistan's disadvantage increase.
As an example he said in a skirmish in one sector of LoC both sides will be equal but if the war expands to all along international border after India opens multiple fronts, Pakistan will be at a severe disadvantage and will be forced to rely on nukes.

All PAF munitions were to make nearby actual targets and people shit their pants, that's what was a measured response seeing as neither side was willing to target civilians or millitary targets themselves. The PAF basically simulated actual strikes on a few targets across the LoC, it was to send a message and prove our capability. Even if there's a lid being kept on all things inside India so that the public don't catch a wind, the people who needed to hear the message from PAF, recieved it and then some.

And yes, a major war would see us at a disadvantage, everyone already knows why we maintain a credible nuclear deterrence. Tell us what else is new.

 

[Wa Muhammada]

For the young kids. Pick a city. Pick the known yield of your likely adversarie's warhead. Make sure you designate air-burst and casualties/fallout.

Read the entire results. And that is just one of 150 that your rival possesses. No joke.

https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

Scary sh1t!

 

[OCguy]

Scary sh1t!

I had a recurring nightmare growing up where I would see the first mushroom cloud on the horizon.

The only thing that made it less scary was learning about the weapons in detail.

 

[Wa Muhammada]

Scary sh1t!

How many kilotons is the average nuke which pak & India possess?

 

[WarKa DaNG]

18×400 kg=7200 kg.
It will barely kill even 500, achmed.

Still better than killing trees and a crow

 

[Zarvan]

If India fired 6 missiles and Pakistan fired 18 in return, then India would have fired back 54 missiles and at that rate Pakistan would have run out of missiles far before India as number of missiles in Indian inventory is far higher.

Only you could have come up with this dumb analysis. The moment we would be running out of Missiles that would mean at least last 100 Missiles would be carrying nuclear war heads that would there would be no India

 

[Jugger]

a major war would see us at a disadvantage, everyone already knows why we maintain a credible nuclear deterrence. Tell us what else is new.

This is the important point to ponder.
India has already established the new set of rules regarding Kashmir and Pakistan.
The new rule is that a price has to be paid for mischief in Kashmir.
It is India that has crossed the border after 40 years to carry out the attack. But India’s over confidence cost a Mig 21, which is unfortunate but beneficial in the long run.
The important point to be noted is that India has not targeted any Pakistani military installations or personal, so the chance of leading to war is negligible.
Pakistan has downed the Indian Mig 21 after it had crossed over to Pakistan and not in Indian territory, it has right of defending its air space. Also Pakistan has not targeted/ destroyed any Indian military installations thereby not requiring a response from the Indian side.

 

[Jungibaaz]

This is the important point to ponder.
India has already established the new set of rules regarding Kashmir and Pakistan.
The new rule is that a price has to be paid for mischief in Kashmir.
It is India that has crossed the border after 40 years to carry out the attack. But India’s over confidence cost a Mig 21, which is unfortunate but beneficial in the long run.
The important point to be noted is that India has not targeted any Pakistani military installations or personal, so the chance of leading to war is negligible.
Pakistan has downed the Indian Mig 21 after it had crossed over to Pakistan and not in Indian territory, it has right of defending its air space. Also Pakistan has not targeted/ destroyed any Indian military installations thereby not requiring a response from the Indian side.

It's not our fault if following unrest (which despite you blame us for), you rile up your own people and media, and then defy sane calls from PM of Pakistan to allow for an investigation and open peace overtures. Subsequently launching a politically motivated airspace violation, at our expense.

This was done in 2016 and India got away with the drama. What's changed isn't your idea of the price of unrest in kashmir, which you say is a strike inside Pakistan. What has changed is that the price of a strike in Pakistan, is the price of an equal if not greater strike in India, and possibly a Mig-21 for interest.

Senior people in your millitary did not like the idea of using the Indian army for bollywood-esque drama back in 2016. And now no serious person in your ranks will want a superficial drama to be created in future by your politicians, there is a larger threat you pose to us and the immediate threat is payback for the unequal way this conflict ended. But even that doesn't fit with your analysis of the initial Indian provocation.

 

[AZ1]

Every one pakistan and india discussing nuclear as it is just a fire cracker on sky. If just one city hit with nuclear it will effect whole country because it will spread through air. Hope it will not come to that and just time pass mouth game from both countriesm