newdelhinsa
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2010
- Messages
- 1,923
- Reaction score
- -2
There is no indication that the Army was responsible for this, so what is wrong with saying with my statement?
I think you are posting for sake of just posting. Your own post can entertain the same reasoning that there is no indication that India by not releasing 7 fishermen (which is state/local police case, has always been the case for civilians crossing International waters)made your PM cancel the MFN to India. The idiot who wrote article in The Hindu failed when he compared fishermen crossing the international border (a common, everyday violation) with a rare violation of LOC by InA officers crossing the borders.
Anyhow, one request, please do not quote my whole post but quote the part/line you are going to answer.
In my rest of the post I have told you that people pointing at GHQ can be justified given the trend and the phenomenon. I also mentioned that your PM might have been explaining the the process, and the proposal is still on. His technical explanation is quite clever to clam down (if that is the case)/be-fool hatemonger in Pakistan; meanwhile your cabinet will draft the proposal, while all haters will muck around in confusion.