kris
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2016
- Messages
- 2,565
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
Unfortunately you are thinking only in your perspective.. same happens from indian side too...There were border wars between China and Russia(1969), China and Vietnam(1979). Now the land disputes with these countries don't exist. Because after years negotiations, territory agreements were reached. Which benifited these countries a lot. They don't have to spend huge amount of money on the border defense anymore. Mutual trust could be built as next step. And there is no room for super power to use the issues to sow discord. It's part of reasons why China could concentrate on economy since 1990 after these border disputes were settled.
View attachment 643373
Fake Russian guard was found on China-Russia border
View attachment 643372
I heard India's constitution prohibits any compromise in territory. Which means India will face China's military pressure for ever. It would be an endless nightmare for India. There would never be an agreement between the two countries on the territory disputes unless China accepts all India's requests. Which is not only impossible, also doesn't fit for any peaceful agreement or discussion.
China has signed territory agreements with many of its neighbours. I didn't see India had done that with any of its neighbour.
"Never give up one inch land"-----It sounds very encouraging and brave. In fact this rigid policy is very stupid. It shows the founding father of India lacks far sighted political wisdom.
So will there be a great leader of India who would sacrifice his fame to amend the constitution and negotiates with China, Parkistan and all neighbours to finish all border disputes? It would be a bless for India if there is man who can make that feat.
Once the agreements are reached, the peace dividend would be huge for India. The insecure feeing that haunted India for decades would disappear once and for all. Money will be saved. Independent foreign policies will be made.
Of course India will have to give up some of its claimed territories. So will China and Pakistan. This is how negotiation works. But, how will Indians see this leader? A hero or a traitor? Can a democratic system produce this kind of selfless leader? Can a democratic system allows this leader to fulfil his task? Hard to say.
It will be beneficial for china too in long run to settle this stupid issue for once and for all..
China needs ior more than india needs ladakh.. and don't forget Vietnam settled the border dispute by Kicking straight into China's balls..
India will definitely not yield... Forget about any leader. No country ever will.
The worst part of negotiations with china is " what I have with me is mine, what you have with you is for negotiations"
Not gonna work.. they have to put something for us on the table to settle this issue...
Just seee Pakistan.. india wanted to make loc the IB. Their sheer superior attitude is causing nothing but loss of live and material
Rest I agree
Await your negative rating, how dare you ask their emperor by name?As per Chinese and Pakistanis,
Any leader who would gift them Indian lands is a great leader.
Hey...why don't you ask your Xi to be a great leader and give us back Gosthana and Free Tibet.
Of course india did make compromises with myanmar. Cocoa islands were given to settle the disputes which is supposedly used by china now to spy on indiaI know India is a bully in South Asia. Were the disputes resolved on India's favor? Were there any compromises from India?
Bangladesh gained more land than india during these settlements..
Same with srilanka. They got an island (kalachitivu?)
Nepal predates india. All the borders agreements are with british...