What's new

India: Muslim warrior king's rocket cache found in abandoned well

Here is passage form that wiki page link u gave
In 1788, Tipu ordered his governor in CalicutSher Khan to begin the process of converting Hindus to Islam, and in July of that year, 200 Brahmins were forcibly converted and made to eat beef.[124] Mohibbul Hasan, Prof. Sheikh Ali, and other historians cast great doubt on the scale of the deportations and forced conversions in Coorg in particular, and Hasan says that the British versions of what happened were intended to malign Tipu Sultan, and to be used as propaganda against him.[117] He argues that little reliance can be placed in Muslim accounts such as Kirmani's Nishan-e Haidari; in their anxiety to represent the Sultan as a champion of Islam, they had a tendency to exaggerate and distort the facts: Kirmani claims that 70,000 Coorgis were converted, when forty years later the entire population of Coorg was still less than that number. According to Ramchandra Rao Punganuri the true number of converts was about 500.[125]

So first make a lot allegations for genocide mass forced conversion
then in end give facts that these numbers were historically impossible :)

I said some of the sources cited were correct, not all.
 
. .
Looks like the ones refuting your fake claims of persecution at hands of tipu r ;)

Not at all, the claims made in my post are true. I said:

1. Tipu forced some Brahmins to eat Beef (correct).
2. Tipu destroyed Hindu temples (correct).
3. Tipu fought against Hindus (correct).
 
.
That's brilliant. Now DRDO can reverse engineer it to make their Nirbhay CM a little less crappier.
 
.
Tipu Sultan and Hyder Ali were sons of the lands of what is today known as the state of Karnataka. This is Kannadiga history and by extension, Indian history. Doesn't matter what religion they were as they were both born in the land in which they ruled.

Pakistanis should stick to revising IVC history and leave Kannadiga history alone. We're too Black for you guys anyway.
 
.
Tipu Sultan was a great man that should be remembered and celebrated

Tipu Sultan and Hyder Ali were sons of the lands of what is today known as the state of Karnataka. This is Kannadiga history and by extension, Indian history. Doesn't matter what religion they were as they were both born in the land in which they ruled.

Pakistanis should stick to revising IVC history and leave Kannadiga history alone. We're too Black for you guys anyway.

Was tipu black like you guys?
 
.
Tipu Sultan was a great man that should be remembered and celebrated



Was tipu black like you guys?
Tipu_Sultan_BL.jpg


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipu_Sultan

"Born in Devanhalli, in present day Bangalore rural district."

Can you even pronounce "Devanhalli"? Silly Pakistani.
 
. .
Was tipu black like you guys?
Not all South Indians are dark skinned. But Tipu was indeed dark as described by the British at the time. He was not too tall either.
tipu.PNG


He was a turd who surrendered his sons to save his head from the British.:rolleyes: The picture depicts that.
 
.
Not all South Indians are dark skinned. But Tipu was indeed dark as described by the British at the time. He was not too tall either.
View attachment 488996

He was a turd who surrendered his sons to save his head from the British.:rolleyes: The picture depicts that.

Tipu also fought and won against the colonialists before being defeated. Refer to Anglo-Mysorean wars. The rockets described in OP played a role in his victories.
 
.
I am not a Mulla of madarsa so my evidence are not valid.


Did the Mullahs manage to validate whether indians invented computer chips and e-mails?....:lol:

You keep talking about Madrassas. Does your mum or wife really enjoy going there and getting the time of their lives?.........:lol:
 
Last edited:
.
Tipu Sultan fought frequently against Hindus, forced Brahmins to eat beef, and ordered the destruction of Hindu temples. Yet Hindustanis love him.

His enemy was also the Nizam of Hyderabad, a Muslim, who had allied with the Britishers.

Not everything need be seen through the eye of religion. :)

Tipu's case is more complicated than that.

Tipu Sultan was a great man that should be remembered and celebrated

He was.

Was tipu black like you guys?

Is there a problem if he was?? :)

Tipu Sultan and Hyder Ali were sons of the lands of what is today known as the state of Karnataka. This is Kannadiga history and by extension, Indian history. Doesn't matter what religion they were as they were both born in the land in which they ruled.

Pakistanis should stick to revising IVC history and leave Kannadiga history alone. We're too Black for you guys anyway.

Well, Tipu was an internationalist ( in modern terms ) so we should avoid limiting him to today's Karnataka state or present India.
 
.
His enemy was also the Nizam of Hyderabad, a Muslim, who had allied with the Britishers.

Not everything need be seen through the eye of religion. :)

Tipu's case is more complicated than that.

He allied against his fellow Muslims, that makes him a Munafiq.

Religion played a VERY big role in those times. It's only recently that the world has stopped considering religion a major aspect of politics, and even then not everyone is on board with this idea.
 
.
Hilarious to see Pakistanis claiming Tipu. But considering they even claim the Mughals, it is not surprising.

Good thing Indians don't claim Jinnah considering he was Gujarati.
 
.
He allied against his fellow Muslims, that makes him a Munafiq.

1. The Nizam of Hyderabad was allied with the Britishers against fellow Muslim Tipu. Won't that make the Nizam a munafiq??

2. In the 2011 Libya war, the Gulfi states and the Turkish government were allied with NATO against the Imam of all Muslims, Muammar Gaddafi. Shouldn't the Gulfis and Erdogan be considered munafiq??

Religion played a VERY big role in those times. It's only recently that the world has stopped considering religion a major aspect of politics, and even then not everyone is on board with this idea.

I think the early Islamic conquests and the Christian Crusades were among the few big wars that were actually religion-based.

Otherwise, even in India we can speak of the Mughals having Hindu generals and administrators. And I believe the Hindu Maratha king, Shivaji, employed Muslims in various capacities. Most wars were based on protecting or increasing kingdoms.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom