What's new

India most threatened by N-weapons

India First started the Nuclear Project so now they are feeling threatened by us :hitwall:
what bull crap is your comprehending capacity Mr Zarvan, the article clearly says that Mr Mani Shankar Aiyar is talking for disarming the planet from WMD and not Pakistan. you have always had a miopic eye sight when it comes to any one from India or when you heared the word India.
 
.
i question your 'wisdom' then....



we dont need the nukes for survival, though they definitely do turn the power balance MORE in our favour. .

the indians certainly think twice, thrice, a thousand times before daring to attack Pakistan (conventionally or unconventionally) so therefore the mission is already accomplished. . especially given that the air-based, land-based (and soon, sea-based) delivery systems are operational and/or undergoing further testing.

india never attacked pakistan,is not interested in attacking now and in the future as well,india is developing its nuclear triad for defence purpose so that pakistan will think 100k times before attacking india
 
.
It doesn't matter who started the race first. It all depends who's got the balls to bomb first.
 
.
It doesn't matter who started the race first. It all depends who's got the balls to bomb first.
so as per your logic, till now both of had not bombed each other, so we both lag the balls you are talking about right?
come on mate, the article clearly says that Mr Mani Shankar Aiyar is speeking for a world with our WMD and he is not talking about disarming Pakistan Alone, his point is NTPC is useless and he is talking about abandoning WMD that are already in stock with the known and unknown nuclear weapons state.
 
. .
so as per your logic, till now both of had not bombed each other, so we both lag the balls you are talking about right?
come on mate, the article clearly says that Mr Mani Shankar Aiyar is speeking for a world with our WMD and he is not talking about disarming Pakistan Alone, his point is NTPC is useless and he is talking about abandoning WMD that are already in stock with the known and unknown nuclear weapons state.

Well no one is talking about the article so i assume i should get a clear message on both sides. Cappish? happy now. Lets get back to the topic
 
.
Pakistan nuclear doctrine reflects the samson option which in its basic principles states that nuclear force will be used if the nations existence is at stake India isn't just going to let Pakistan blackmail it with nuclear weapons while at the same it can launch terrorist attacks on its soil at free will ABM technology and our spy satellites that show us where your missile bases and nuclear weapons facilities are located will help us in defense America and Israel might chip in with satellite imagery as well

be real here in case of a confrontation the first thing India will do is carpet bomb Pakistani missile bases or use cruise missiles (future BM2, Nirbhay, LRCM, to prevent missiles from even being launched and even if they are launched the ABM will take effect and India's nuclear doctrine enshrines any attack on its forces or civilians will prompt a "massive" retaliatory response
 
.
Sardarji,
thori ji akaal istimaal kaarrr laooo
. Are you saying our Nuclear weapons are no threat to you??? Let me tell you what, go wash your face with chilled water and then come back. Now do you see the difference in the # of nuclear weapons:
Pakistan: 90-110
India: 80-100
You still don't understand ? Go ask your fellow Army Chief.
You guys have a big area and most of it is Slums. 2 is more than enough to destroy your main cities
And according to all reports Pakistan in Rapidly Increasing its Nuclear Weapons by every passing day and also working Missiles like Taimur and Shaeen with the range of 4000 and 7000 KM so India will be in great danger
 
.
And according to all reports Pakistan in Rapidly Increasing its Nuclear Weapons by every passing day and also working Missiles like Taimur and Shaeen with the range of 4000 and 7000 KM so India will be in great danger

the fact still remains that pakistan need more nukes to destroy india then what india needs to destroy pakistan,having advantage of 10 dont count much since the size of our countries is a lot different
 
.
And according to all reports Pakistan in Rapidly Increasing its Nuclear Weapons by every passing day and also working Missiles like Taimur and Shaeen with the range of 4000 and 7000 KM so India will be in great danger
oh yes, after developing such weapons, you and your elite fanatic group is planning to use it on India and make us your slaves. Don't you, That is what mr Zarvan has always been aiming at, isn't it?
 
.
the fact still remains that pakistan need more nukes to destroy india then what india needs to destroy pakistan,having advantage of 10 dont count much since the size of our countries is a lot different


Agreed. Almost all of the population centers in Pakistan straddles Indo-Pak border within reach of our Prithvi short range missiles.
 
.
the fact still remains that pakistan need more nukes to destroy india then what india needs to destroy pakistan,having advantage of 10 dont count much since the size of our countries is a lot different
That doesn't mean our Nuclear Assets are not a threat to you I responded to that statement
 
.
Also, India should find a way to threaten the US in order to prove that you are a true rising power.

If US doesn't have you in mind, then you are not a true rising power.
 
.
Also, India should find a way to threaten the US in order to prove that you are a true rising power.

If US doesn't have you in mind, then you are not a true rising power.

No thanks you can have that post..
 
.
That doesn't mean our Nuclear Assets are not a threat to you I responded to that statement

i never sait that they are not a threat,its just that adding 10 nukes over indias stock pile does not gives you very big advantage,as far as threat is concerned even 1-2 nukes are a threat considering the fallout
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom