What's new

India may be offered a share in GLONASS

chalukya

BANNED

New Recruit

Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
Russia is seriously considering building a broad international consortium for the development and implementation of the Russian GLONASS satellite navigation system on a global scale. The government is also seriously considering the possibility of selling a stake in the development of the system to foreign countries, among which India would be given a priority.

“We have prioritized the countries -firstly the states where GLONASS may be required for geopolitical reasons,” says Navigation Information Systems (NIS, formerly NIS GLONASS) Chief Executive Alexander Gurko says. “We could invite India, Kazakhstan, Brazil, South Korea and several other countries into the consortium.”

These countries have traditionally been considered as the priority markets for the GLONASS technology, except perhaps South Korea. The idea of bringing India as a strategic partner for the development of GLONASS was discussed several times at the highest level. In 2007, then-Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov said that India was ready to participate in the development of GLONASS, providing rockets for launching satellites and helping to develop new spacecraft for the navigation system.


Indo-Russian cooperation

“In the early 2000’s both the framework agreement on the use of GLONASS and specific contracts that were unattainable were signed with India,” says an informed source at the Russian Space Agency. “It was an agreement where they would help us to develop the ‘GLONASS-K;’ the group would have been half-Indian, half-Russian. Under those conditions, such agreements were offered out of desperation; I had to save the system. Then came the idea of FTP GLONASS and the ideas of co-creation of the navigation system were left behind.”

According Gurko in the early 2000s, India itself actively offered investments in GLONASS to the Russian government. “I met with the director of the Indian Space Agency at that time. He expressed bewilderment why Russia refused the idea of investment then, because it was obvious that this investment would offer many opportunities of opening a new and huge GLONASS market, and to build an appropriate technical regulation in the Indian market.”

NIS, which has not met as much success as it would have liked in the Indian market, warned that hopes to capture the markets of other countries with the same methods as they conquered the Russian market cannot be justified. The company’s representatives said that if in Russia, there are orders to use whatever equipment the government gives, this is not practiced in India, and the introduction of navigation systems are in the hands of private companies.

“Availability of different consortia, joint ventures in itself does not guarantee the promotion of Russian interests in foreign markets,” says Tatiana Kuleshova, Director of the press department at NIS. “The ability to promote Russian companies in India will depend on how the consortium is organized.”

Equipment manufacturers perceive the idea of forming an international consortium with cautious optimism. “If the authorities agree on the introduction of GLONASS technologies in India and Brazil, we will be staked out by these markets, we, of course, will go there,” says Anatoly Korkush, Chief Executive of Geostar navigation, which produces navigation receivers. “Americans were coming towards the domination of GPS for many years, popularizing their system. We now have a temporary advantage over Beidou and Galileo, which have not been launched yet. So today any GLONASS popularization is positive – because the wider the Russian system is used, the greater is the potential market for us, its commercial producers. All major Western vendors have already released the GLONASS chips, so we can assume that our technology is recognized worldwide. We need to expand its influence outside of the Customs Union.”


India may be offered a share in GLONASS | Russia & India Report
 
. . .
But babus would prefer GLONASS as they get money under the table...
I think that our indigenous GPS system will cover only south asia and China so we may need a partnership with Russia for covering the whole globe.....
 
.
I think that our indigenous GPS system will cover only south asia and China so we may need a partnership with Russia for covering the whole globe.....
I think if we can have a system capable of covering south Asia and china, We should be able to create a system that's capable of covering the remaining part also!!! If GLONASS is given for free then fine, but if there is money transaction then better invest in making our GPS better...
 
.
I think if we can have a system capable of covering south Asia and china, We should be able to create a system that's capable of covering the remaining part also!!! If GLONASS is given for free then fine, but if there is money transaction then better invest in making our GPS better...
We have the system for covering the whole globe,you only need to put more satellites which is costly thats why i think we will be sharing the costs with Russia by sharing GLONASS.....
 
.
We will have our own GPS system by the end of 2014.........


IRNSS will be a regional satellite system with a coverage of 1500-2000km around India. It will be completed by 2015. As of now, there are no plans to increase the range for IRNSS. But im pretty positive this will change as India grows.
 
.
IRNSS will be a regional satellite system with a coverage of 1500-2000km around India. It will be completed by 2015. As of now, there are no plans to increase the range for IRNSS. But im pretty positive this will change as India grows.
yeah,it is costly thats why we are not covering the whole globe but only south asia and china.....
 
.
We will have our own GPS system by the end of 2014.........

Our system will give input only for South Asian region. What glonass provide is full worldwide coverage, with a business system, that has the ability to compete with GPS.
 
.
yeah,it is costly thats why we are not covering the whole globe but only south asia and china.....


Not really, the whole cost of IRNSS was around 250 million, far less than others.
 
.
I think its better we co operate with them.. its is economically more viable and we will get world wide coverage also..
 
.
Its good to have both glonass and irnss development in parallel. with irnss we can cover whole of sa and china. Rest would be covered by glonass.
 
.
yeah,it is costly thats why we are not covering the whole globe but only south asia and china.....

One of the primary objective for us to put GAGAN & IRNSS in place was to make ourselves self sufficient in terms of navigation support for our strategic arms as well as armed forces ...for our defense needs we can't rely on any other country ...
Given our defense priorities regional navigation system with focus on Indian subcontinent and Indian ocean region is sufficient at the moment ...

If we go by General Malik's recent revelation as to how a friendly nation supplied us with 3-4 year old images of Tololing area during Kargil war ...This will make sense.

when it comes to defense of our nation there should not be any compromises ... !
 
Last edited:
.
We will have our own GPS system by the end of 2014.........

True, but participation in GLONASS will give India another back-up redundancy option.
Of course we must remain mindful of what specific role Russia will offer India in the consortium.
 
.
We will have our own GPS system by the end of 2014.........

Neither GAGAN or IRNSSS, though capable, will offer global coverage and I think having share in GLONASS is good thing.

Russia is seriously considering building a broad international consortium for the development and implementation of the Russian GLONASS satellite navigation system on a global scale. The government is also seriously considering the possibility of selling a stake in the development of the system to foreign countries, among which India would be given a priority.

We have prioritized the countries -firstly the states where GLONASS may be required for geopolitical reasons,” says Navigation Information Systems (NIS, formerly NIS GLONASS) Chief Executive Alexander Gurko says. “We could invite India, Kazakhstan, Brazil, South Korea and several other countries into the consortium.”

These countries have traditionally been considered as the priority markets for the GLONASS technology, except perhaps South Korea. The idea of bringing India as a strategic partner for the development of GLONASS was discussed several times at the highest level. In 2007, then-Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov said that India was ready to participate in the development of GLONASS, providing rockets for launching satellites and helping to develop new spacecraft for the navigation system.


Indo-Russian cooperation

“In the early 2000’s both the framework agreement on the use of GLONASS and specific contracts that were unattainable were signed with India,” says an informed source at the Russian Space Agency. “It was an agreement where they would help us to develop the ‘GLONASS-K;’ the group would have been half-Indian, half-Russian. Under those conditions, such agreements were offered out of desperation; I had to save the system. Then came the idea of FTP GLONASS and the ideas of co-creation of the navigation system were left behind.”

According Gurko in the early 2000s, India itself actively offered investments in GLONASS to the Russian government. “I met with the director of the Indian Space Agency at that time. He expressed bewilderment why Russia refused the idea of investment then, because it was obvious that this investment would offer many opportunities of opening a new and huge GLONASS market, and to build an appropriate technical regulation in the Indian market.”

NIS, which has not met as much success as it would have liked in the Indian market, warned that hopes to capture the markets of other countries with the same methods as they conquered the Russian market cannot be justified. The company’s representatives said that if in Russia, there are orders to use whatever equipment the government gives, this is not practiced in India, and the introduction of navigation systems are in the hands of private companies.

“Availability of different consortia, joint ventures in itself does not guarantee the promotion of Russian interests in foreign markets,” says Tatiana Kuleshova, Director of the press department at NIS. “The ability to promote Russian companies in India will depend on how the consortium is organized.”

Equipment manufacturers perceive the idea of forming an international consortium with cautious optimism. “If the authorities agree on the introduction of GLONASS technologies in India and Brazil, we will be staked out by these markets, we, of course, will go there,” says Anatoly Korkush, Chief Executive of Geostar navigation, which produces navigation receivers. “Americans were coming towards the domination of GPS for many years, popularizing their system. We now have a temporary advantage over Beidou and Galileo, which have not been launched yet. So today any GLONASS popularization is positive – because the wider the Russian system is used, the greater is the potential market for us, its commercial producers. All major Western vendors have already released the GLONASS chips, so we can assume that our technology is recognized worldwide. We need to expand its influence outside of the Customs Union.”


India may be offered a share in GLONASS | Russia & India Report

Thanks for info.

India may be offered a share in GLONASS | idrw.org
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom