India: Last Nail in the coffin of Secularism?

[Chhatrapati]

More filth spewing forth from this gutter mentality where caste-type designations are simply the norm.
Whatever I am, seems to have triggered you into full Brahmin mode with a simple demonstration of facts and the English language. I'll remember the template for next time.

You'll get a logical response when you ask logical questions, when you start pot stirring, that's what you get.

Indians and their elected representatives are perhaps dumb enough to believe this "world's biggest democracy" thing.

Constitution can be made and unmade. Supreme Court is non-entity and has no right to decide anything about constitution. It is directly the will of the people. Supreme Court itself can be abolished by abolishing the constitution. Why would anyone with common sense think that some random book written by some people is absolutely supreme? There are many other people who can write many other books. What is so great about this one book? Why should someone else adhere to the book written by some bunch of self appointed people?

Take time to read up the constitution, especially the power of Supreme Court was pretty evident during Indira's time. That set the ground rules we play on.
As for the rest anarchist stuff, talk when you're sober.

 

[Smarana Mitra]

Mughals etc didn't need to go to court because Hindus also committed barbaric acts in that era without going to court for legal dispensations.

Or do you believe in some kind of absolute moral or legal code that exists throughout the whole timeline of the Indian subcontinent? I'd be interested to know if that's the case.

All I am saying is that it is unacceptable to accept Dharmics to follow arbitrary codes which are inconsistent across time. If there was no code in 800 AD, or 1200AD, there is hardly any reason to expect a code today. So, don't expect Dharmics to follow any code with muslims regarding Babri mosque or any other matter.

We must realize that ultimately issues between India and Pakistan would be settled in a medieval fashion, where there is not much scope for rational discussions and deliberations. At least, this is absolutely clear to me, having regard to the mentality of these Gangadoos.

Sorry, we won't use swords or arrows. We are going to use modern weapons. So, it won't be settled in medieval manner. Though it will be settled only by war.

Take time to read up the constitution, especially the power of Supreme Court was pretty evident during Indira's time. That set the ground rules we play on.
As for the rest anarchist stuff, talk when you're sober.

Don't ask me to refer to power of supreme court during Indira's time. During Indira's time, indira herself was weak and had no ground level support. Indira was PM only because there was no organised opposition. So, taking advantage of others' weakness and then showing power is absurd. Look how Bangladesh nullified its constitution or amended it. Look how Venezuela changed its constitution. Hitler also redrew the constitution before WW2. So, why selectively quote one arbitrary example of Indira Gandhi to claim some supremacy of constitution or supreme court?

If you can't talk logically based on absolute logic only rely on some event of the past and simply assume that the same thing will be done again and again, then you should get treatment in mental hospital.

 

[PradoTLC]

Indian Bhakts of Bharat is talking about the matters concerns their nation .
There opinion matters .
Pakistan is not a factor there


Didnt ask for your certificate.

but you need it... as you people love to to certify us . we are just returning the favour

What is the matter ?

taste of your own medicine too bitter?

no?

It's always a good sign when your adversary is living in a fool's paradise and that's exactly what you're doing right now

I agree..


like the IAF.

Thinking it could actually shoot down a F-16 that too piloted by a CCS grade pilot.

Great insight into hindooo Endia

 

[Chhatrapati]

Don't ask me to refer to power of supreme court during Indira's time. During Indira's time, indira herself was weak and had no ground level support. Indira was PM only because there was no organised opposition. So, taking advantage of others' weakness and then showing power is absurd. Look how Bangladesh nullified its constitution or amended it. Look how Venezuela changed its constitution. Hitler also redrew the constitution before WW2. So, why selectively quote one arbitrary example of Indira Gandhi to claim some supremacy of constitution or supreme court?

If you can't talk logically based on absolute logic only rely on some event of the past and simply assume that the same thing will be done again and again, then you should get treatment in mental hospital.

Yeah whatever, you don't seem to get the point of all.
Modi or BJP (or anyone else) can do shit about changing constitution. It's as simple as that.

 

[Smarana Mitra]

Yeah whatever, you don't seem to get the point of all.
Modi or BJP (or anyone else) can do shit about changing constitution. It's as simple as that.

Modi or BJP did not campaign for constitutional change. if they campaign for constitutional change like Chavez did in Venezuela, then constitution will be changed. It is simple logic that the expectation is that a party only implements those policies which it has already campaigned for and has obtained people's consent in terms of vote. So, if BJP campaigns for constitutional change, constitution will and must be changed once BJP is elected. Another way of changing constitution is by holding referendum. At the end of the day, a few people are not ones who can change constitution drastically. Changing constitution always has to be from the people themselves.

Who is not getting the point? You or me? I never said that Modi or BJP has the authority to change constitution. I only said that dharmic population has the authority to change constitution. If dharmics want the constitution thrown out and those who resist be attacked, then that is what will be done.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

All I am saying is that it is unacceptable to accept Dharmics to follow arbitrary codes which are inconsistent across time. If there was no code in 800 AD, or 1200AD, there is hardly any reason to expect a code today. So, don't expect Dharmics to follow any code with muslims regarding Babri mosque or any other matter.


Sorry, we won't use swords or arrows. We are going to use modern weapons. So, it won't be settled in medieval manner. Though it will be settled only by war.


Don't ask me to refer to power of supreme court during Indira's time. During Indira's time, indira herself was weak and had no ground level support. Indira was PM only because there was no organised opposition. So, taking advantage of others' weakness and then showing power is absurd. Look how Bangladesh nullified its constitution or amended it. Look how Venezuela changed its constitution. Hitler also redrew the constitution before WW2. So, why selectively quote one arbitrary example of Indira Gandhi to claim some supremacy of constitution or supreme court?

If you can't talk logically based on absolute logic only rely on some event of the past and simply assume that the same thing will be done again and again, then you should get treatment in mental hospital.

Likewise we won't be held accountable if some Mughal built a mosque over some Hindu temple, even if you could ever in your wildest dreams prove that.

 

[Smarana Mitra]

Likewise we won't be held accountable if some Mughal built a mosque over some Hindu temple, even if you could ever in your wildest dreams prove that.

Muslims of today are supportive of muslims of the past and don't have any intention of giving up Islam. So, it is "guilty by association".

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Muslims of today are supportive of muslims of the past and don't have any intention of giving up Islam. So, it is "guilty by association".

Haha load of tripe. I guess Pope Francis is guilty for the crusades and India should get reparations from Greece for Alexander's rampage.

 

[Smarana Mitra]

Haha load of tripe. I guess Pope Francis is guilty for the crusades and India should get reparations from Greece for Alexander's rampage.

False flag. Greece does not have the same culture as Alexander nor do current Greeks have any glorification of Alexander. Current greeks converted to Christianity at about 300-400AD whereas Alexander was still a pagan with hellenistic faith.

Secondly, Crusades was against muslims by christians. Yes, pope today also follows same ideology and hence he can be held as part of crusaders. But it is not my problem as crusades were against muslims. Let muslims decide that.

 

[SIPRA]

Likewise we won't be held accountable if some Mughal built a mosque over some Hindu temple, even if you could ever in your wildest dreams prove that.

I salute to your patience, for responding to such posters.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

False flag. Greece does not have the same culture as Alexander nor do current Greeks have any glorification of Alexander. Current greeks converted to Christianity at about 300-400AD whereas Alexander was still a pagan with hellenistic faith.

Secondly, Crusades was against muslims by christians. Yes, pope today also follows same ideology and hence he can be held as part of crusaders. But it is not my problem as crusades were against muslims. Let muslims decide that.

I don't think you meant "false flag" there...

Perhaps a Freudian slip.

 

[Smarana Mitra]

I don't think you meant "false flag" there...

Perhaps a Freudian slip.

I meant "false analogy' or "Apples & Oranges". False flag was wrong usage