What's new

India, Iran to join Afghan peace process: Olson

Pakistan will do what? Walk away? Things have gone far enough that US has added India and Iran to the mix.



No, I think you are mixing two different things. US may have had a hand in fighting the Soviets by funding and army Afghan resistance, but they had no hand in rise of the Taliban, who emerged in the 1990s, long after US had left Afghanistan.
Your English comprehension is as much wrong as your history ! USA doesn't add Iran and India, she is thinking to do so..!
And for other thing, if Pakistan moves away then so does Afghan Talibans...with whom USA shall have dialogue then? Please don't quote me again...Not worth replying to you...!
 
.
What border does India share with Afghanistan? India is irrelevant. US desperate once again.
 
.
Your English comprehension is as much wrong as your history ! USA doesn't add Iran and India, she is thinking to do so..!
And for other thing, if Pakistan moves away then so does Afghan Talibans...with whom USA shall have dialogue then? Please don't quote me again...Not worth replying to you...!

First line from the OP:

"India and Iran will be included in the Afghan peace process at a later stage, a senior US official has said while recognising Pakistan’s role as well."


Source: https://defence.pk/threads/india-iran-to-join-afghan-peace-process-olson.437248/#ixzz4D5qMuJRA

Don't know where you got the idea US is "thinking" about adding India and Iran. Good day.
 
.
.
What border does India share with Afghanistan? India is irrelevant. US desperate once again.

India is relevant in Afghan matters because Afghanistan wants India to be so. India is a friendly nation to Afghanistan and nations don't need a common border to be friends. Do Pakistan and Turkey share a common border??
 
.
038d861f159643ba9a040dbb9d14671c_18.jpg


WASHINGTON: India and Iran will be included in the Afghan peace process at a later stage, a senior US official has said while recognising Pakistan’s role as well.

In tweets sent after he spoke at a Washington think tank on Tuesday, Ambassador Richard Olson said: “Pakistan does remain committed to the process of reconciliation and talks in Afghanistan.”
Mr Olson was the US ambassador in Islamabad before he was called back to Washington late last year and made the US special representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan.

He noted that both India and Iran had stakes in Afghanistan’s future and said that’s why they would be included in peace efforts at a later stage.
But Washington’s priority now was to get the talks started, he added.

Ambassador Olson said the US decision to eliminate Taliban leader Mullah Mansour and give combat powers to American troops in Afghanistan should not be seen as indication of a lack of interest in the peace process.
“The Taliban’s repeated refusal to join talks with the Afghan government contributed to the US decision to take action against Mullah Mansur on May 21,” he said.

He noted that some commentators interpreted the strike as indicating a shift in US strategy or a weakening of its commitment to the peace process. “It has not,” he said.
“Mullah Mansur was an obstacle to peace, posed a continued threat to US persons through his support for operations against US forces, and was perpetuating a war without end.”

On June 9, President Obama gave the US military the power to assist the Afghan military in combat missions against the Taliban.

But Ambassador Olson pointed out that while announcing these decisions, “President Obama made clear … that the removal of Mullah Mansur and the expanded US authority do not represent a strategic shift in our approach to Afghanistan.”

The envoy assured the international community that the US was not resuming day-to-day combat operations in Afghanistan.

“The Afghan national defence and security forces have full responsibility, as they should, for providing security in their country,” he said. “Nonetheless, this strike should make clear to all parties in the region that the United States is fully prepared to protect its interests.”

Emphasising the US commitment to fight terrorism, Mr Olson said: “Even though the United States has ceased combat operations against the Taliban, we will continue to protect our people and our interests.”
But the determination to fight for its interests had not lessened US commitment to seeking a negotiated settlement to the Afghan dispute, he said.
“We will also continue to encourage an Afghan-led, Afghan-owned peace process in which the Afghan government and the Afghan Taliban can bring this conflict to an end.”
http://www.dawn.com/news/1266651


Too many cooks spoil the broth ?

India is relevant in Afghan matters because Afghanistan wants India to be so. India is a friendly nation to Afghanistan and nations don't need a common border to be friends. Do Pakistan and Turkey share a common border??

The northern Alliance is not Afghanistan.

That is a point that neither Hindu-stan nor Iran nor the US are willing to accept since last 15 years.
 
.
Iran should be welcome at later stage, but India? its irrelevent state who have nothing to do here, anyways there will be no peace talks in near future bcoz of killing of mansur..
 
.
India is relevant in Afghan matters because Afghanistan wants India to be so. India is a friendly nation to Afghanistan and nations don't need a common border to be friends. Do Pakistan and Turkey share a common border??

Pakistan isn't negotiating with Turkey's neighbors just because they are "good friends".

India has zero track record of peace negotiations. There is already claim of genocide against Kashmir on their head how can they take part in any peace talks between other nations. Go butt into Russian matters if you feel you are their "good friend".

Bringing India constantly into the mix in Afghanistan is showing true colours of NATO who after 15 years do not understand the root cause of the conflict, just wasting everybodys time by keeping organised chaos in Afghanistan to keep a presence in the region.

This is Iran and Pakistans problem because they are Afghanistans neighbors and have a vested interest in securing peace.

US should be thanked for their pointless contribution and ushered out of the region so the right people can sit down and talk with open minds.

Northern alliance child molesting warlords have no part in Afghanistans future. The only way to have true lasting peace is to negotiate with Taliban and transition them into a mainstream political party.
 
.
The continued turmoil in Afghanistan is now mostly terrorism, and India is a victim of that terrorism when an Indian Airlines plane was hijacked from Nepal and taken to Afghanistan. The Taliban let off those hijackers and terrorists free. Moreover, India's consulates in Afghanistan is one of the few countries that is attacked repeatedly by these terrorists, so India does have a role to play. Nevertheless, the call lies with Afghan govt., if they don't want India in peace talks we should stay away, but they are the only one to dictate who should be in or out of talks, not Pakistan.

good so recent Turkey is also victim of terrorism go and start your influence over there too.. Africa is victim of terror since last 4 decades.... go and start influence in their countries over there... bs as usual from nut head indians!
 
.
Mansoor was the one who was refusing to negotiate. He was an impediment.
Says who the Americans ? If he wasn't willing then he wouldn't have conducted two rounds of talks. After first round of talks death of mullah umar is made public and after second round of talk mullah mansoor is killed so it is very obvious that americans have no interest in peace talks
 
.
good so recent Turkey is also victim of terrorism go and start your influence over there too.. Africa is victim of terror since last 4 decades.... go and start influence in their countries over there... bs as usual from nut head indians!

What part of this below comment you did not read..or are just dumb enough who can't!! Indian embassies or people in Turkey or North Africa (if you are referring to Libya, Egypt) or any other Indian interests were not attacked, so we got no reason to involve in their peace process there.

Taliban directly got involved with the 2001 Indian Airlines hijackers, supported and released the subsequent terrorists that were freed, of course in connivance with Pakistan. If they or Pakistan wanted India out of talks they should have not attacked Indian interests. Since the war, in Afghanistan there has been 5 attacks on Indian embassy/consulates, but 2 on American and just 1 on Pakistan.

...The Taliban let off those hijackers and terrorists free. Moreover, India's consulates in Afghanistan is one of the few countries that is attacked repeatedly by these terrorists, so India does have a role to play...
 
.
Pakistan isn't negotiating with Turkey's neighbors just because they are "good friends".

India has zero track record of peace negotiations. There is already claim of genocide against Kashmir on their head how can they take part in any peace talks between other nations. Go butt into Russian matters if you feel you are their "good friend".

Bringing India constantly into the mix in Afghanistan is showing true colours of NATO who after 15 years do not understand the root cause of the conflict, just wasting everybodys time by keeping organised chaos in Afghanistan to keep a presence in the region.

This is Iran and Pakistans problem because they are Afghanistans neighbors and have a vested interest in securing peace.

US should be thanked for their pointless contribution and ushered out of the region so the right people can sit down and talk with open minds.

Northern alliance child molesting warlords have no part in Afghanistans future. The only way to have true lasting peace is to negotiate with Taliban and transition them into a mainstream political party.

1) Kashmir has nothing to do with Afghan issue.. Stop using strawman arguments. All of Indian foreign policy doesn't revolve around Kashmir.

2) Perhaps we would go and “butt" into Russian matters if and when Russia invites us to do so, like the Afghan govt has invited.

3) No, this is not only Iran and Pakistan's problem. The last time Taliban siezed power, it had a profound impact on India too.. Remember where the hijacked Air India plane was taken to? Kandahar..!! India doesn't want a repeat of those days. So, India does have a stake in the Afghan peace process.

4) Its the Afghans who will decide who they want involved in their issues, not Pakistan. Afghanistan isnt a province or a client state of Pakistan. Get out of the delusions that Afghans are somehow beholden to you.
 
.
India will be Involved in Afghan peace process sooner than later . In the beginning it might taste like bitter pill to our western neighbor but they will get used to it .
 
.
good so recent Turkey is also victim of terrorism go and start your influence over there too.. Africa is victim of terror since last 4 decades.... go and start influence in their countries over there... bs as usual from nut head indians!

Terror in Turkey or Africa doesn't bother India. There are no repercussions on us. On the other hand, Taliban resurgence in Afghanistan will have a very negative impact on India. So stop deluding yourself that India has no horses in the Afghan race. BS as usual from nut head Pakistanis!
 
.
Terror in Turkey or Africa doesn't bother India. There are no repercussions on us. On the other hand, Taliban resurgence in Afghanistan will have a very negative impact on India. So stop deluding yourself that India has no horses in the Afghan race. BS as usual from nut head Pakistanis!

How ?? you've no border with Afghanistan ... kya logic de hey hahhahahah
 
.
Back
Top Bottom